Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,587
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

Jan 20-24 storm window opens (Jan 22 potential)


Typhoon Tip

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I'd probably expect 2-3" or so for ORH metro right now....and then be pleasantly surprised if we pick up more than that. It all depends on how these boundaries set up....there's a brief period where we may clean up when winds are almost due E Monday night...but there's so many weird things that can happen. Coastal MA is def in a more favorable spot, but we can sometimes pick up the edges of the brunt and end up with a respectable total.

yeah I agreed...if I was a tv met and they wanted a map...I would put 4-6 for eastern areas and mention higher lollies (and screw zones) possible...2-5 for most of central mass and eastern CT to about BDL...west of there 1-3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Euro is like T1279 or something which is relatively close in horizontal res to the NAM and it has more vertical levels too. However it just never seems to be able to sniff out the heavy amounts in these NORLUNs very well for whatever reason.

EC ens were only slightly wetter than the op, but they both have that max axis just offshore of NE MA.

 

Even though the Euro has a higher resolution than the GFS it's still a global model. It has different convective parametrization schemes than a mesoscale model and is also hydrostatic.... so while the higher resolution helps for an intrinsically mesoscale (and convective, you could say) phenomenon it may not be of much use. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Euro is like T1279 or something which is relatively close in horizontal res to the NAM and it has more vertical levels too. However it just never seems to be able to sniff out the heavy amounts in these NORLUNs very well for whatever reason.

EC ens were only slightly wetter than the op, but they both have that max axis just offshore of NE MA.

Even though the Euro has a higher resolution than the GFS it's still a global model. It has different convective parametrization schemes than a mesoscale model and is also hydrostatic.... so while the higher resolution helps for an intrinsically mesoscale (and convective, you could say) phenomenon it may not be of much use.

The hydrostatic issue is key with these

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The hydrostatic issue is key with these

 

Yup. As always, though, the models are going to struggle with the placement. We know the potential given the forcing and low static stability now the issue is where does it set up. York County Maine or Plymouth County Mass?

 

The lingering question for me is whether there's enough synoptic forcing and inflow off the ocean back this way to produce a widespread accumulating snow or is it just light crap before it blossoms to our east. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...