Damage In Tolland Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 The good news just is never ending this morning. Looks like we have a bomb to track next week. Deep, deep, deep winter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 That is some serious cold being advertised on the GFS for late next week. That would be something to get a coastal storm with 850 temps in the -10C to -15C range along with 700mb temps around -20C and 500mb temps around -25C. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian5671 Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 what happened to the big cold early in the week? Upton has us at 29 for Monday-no big deal there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 what happened to the big cold early in the week? Upton has us at 29 for Monday-no big deal there. Post MOnday. Monday's temps are influenced by any storm. Big If. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OSUmetstud Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 geeze...I'm starting to wonder if we get through this period without a significant les event...that would be a kick in the balls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 Meh 1/22 goes to the grinder on the GFS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mahk_webstah Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 Meh 1/22 goes to the grinder on the GFS. I'm not sold on 1/22. I am sold on a big storm later in the week though. I think it is easier to get a big storm after the arctic air has settled in and is perhaps lifting out a bit, than it is to get a storm as it is coming in. There has been a constant signal for a big storm next week at some point and I think we will get one. Full disclosure: I'll be in London from the 20th-23rd so that might be biasing my view lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 I am more sold around the 25th Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moneypitmike Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 I am more sold around the 25th It'll be a problem if it disrupts flights to Orlando on teh 26th...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OKpowdah Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 Can we all just stop and take a minute to reflect on the hole that was ripped in the atmosphere yesterday over the western Pacific. Really impressive stuff. http://www.americanwx.com/bb/index.php/blog/3/entry-30-holy-bombogenesis-w-pac-1152013/ For what it's worth, similar to recurving typhoons, some research I did last year found that extratropical bombs over the western Pacific have a similar effect on the wave train downstream, with the result frequently being a cyclogenesis event east of the Rockies around 7-9 days later. Take it for what it's worth. There is at least another piece of support for something beyond the 22nd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HM Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 I know I've seemed too negative recently (who can blame me as I watch WSWs get hoisted to my south today and have been repeatedly on the wrong side of the r/s line this winter) but there are reasons to remain cautious with next week's waves. I have stated my concerns with the MJO for the last couple of weeks and what that may mean for a more oscillating jet structure/PNA instead of a full blown consistent PNA/Arctic pattern late Jan. As the Pacific changes each 3-4 day period due to various reasons, waves will crash into the ridge out west. Be very mindful of this when interpreting guidance beyond day 5 and especially on the GFS with truncation. There is going to be significant model errors during this time...more than usual. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 I know I've seemed too negative recently (who can blame me as I watch WSWs get hoisted to my south today and have been repeatedly on the wrong side of the r/s line this winter) but there are reasons to remain cautious with next week's waves. I have stated my concerns with the MJO for the last couple of weeks and what that may mean for a more oscillating jet structure/PNA instead of a full blown consistent PNA/Arctic pattern late Jan. As the Pacific changes each 3-4 day period due to various reasons, waves will crash into the ridge out west. Be very mindful of this when interpreting guidance beyond day 5 and especially on the GFS with truncation. There is going to be significant model errors during this time...more than usual. I've thrown flags out all around since the PAC is still a bit up in the air for me. A lot of people have 93-94 in their head and while it can produce..I don't quite see that yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 There was only one 1993-94. The rest of this winter should be a better than the first half. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HM Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 I've thrown flags out all around since the PAC is still a bit up in the air for me. A lot of people have 93-94 in their head and while it can produce..I don't quite see that yet. The orientation of the strat anomalies are going to hinder the -AO anomaly from building down into the NAO domain in the next 7 days. But, I wonder if this is a mistake in the modeling? The longer this takes, the more subject we will be to the Pacific throwing us a curve ball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 This is why in the other thread the focus for the analysis was derived off the 21 member GEFs-derived teleconnector, which currently shows a very concerted rise among the members with limited spread - that was the first point. That much agreement is encouraging for determinism, though not absolute of course... But it helps smooth out perturbation fears. The 2nd point was an apparent rise in both the EPO/NAO domains, signaling the SPV over Jame Bay and vicinity should weaken. What that left with was a PNA spike with the flow relaxing in the TV - operational models began taking advantage of that within the days after posting that but agreed, they've backed off a little. Still, the governing parameters are still evolving the same way as originally assessed, so imo there is just as much chance for greater amplitude depictions to spill out of new cycles. I know I've seemed too negative recently (who can blame me as I watch WSWs get hoisted to my south today and have been repeatedly on the wrong side of the r/s line this winter) but there are reasons to remain cautious with next week's waves. I have stated my concerns with the MJO for the last couple of weeks and what that may mean for a more oscillating jet structure/PNA instead of a full blown consistent PNA/Arctic pattern late Jan. As the Pacific changes each 3-4 day period due to various reasons, waves will crash into the ridge out west. Be very mindful of this when interpreting guidance beyond day 5 and especially on the GFS with truncation. There is going to be significant model errors during this time...more than usual. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 Also, re the MJO: NCEP - "The statistical tools and other dynamical model forecasts maintain eastward propagation into the western Hemisphere." I find that interesting because they're weekly PDF update released yesterday showed an ensemble mean that still "curled" the amplitude back inward into the 6th Phase space. Where as the overnight run now shows a significantly eastward repositioning of that behavior; still curling that backward but doing so more in 7 It would seem quite plausible that we have a medium or greater intensity wave that may end up deeper into Phase 7. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HM Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 New ECMWF shows exactly my concerns from yesterday and my concerns with the tropical forcing from last week on the PNA outcome in late-Jan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorEaster27 Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 New ECMWF shows exactly my concerns from yesterday and my concerns with the tropical forcing from last week on the PNA outcome in late-Jan.most here did not expect more than a few days of a +PNA given the strong pac jet and SST profile in the North Pacific, I spoke about this 2 weeks ago. Not to mention the hammer I drilled about the lack of any sort of -NAO, east or west based. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian5671 Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 New ECMWF shows exactly my concerns from yesterday and my concerns with the tropical forcing from last week on the PNA outcome in late-Jan.what's it look like longer term? Models seemed to have trimmed the cold for Mon/Tue... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 I think the euro ens have damped the pna for days now but try to keep nao making it very latitude dependent ala 94. If the epo goes, the it's a big problem since the cold dump seems to depend on it for seeding. I don't think there's any doubt that we're entering a much better pattern vs the past 6 weeks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 I think the euro ens have damped the pna for days now but try to keep nao making it very latitude dependent ala 94. If the epo goes, the it's a big problem since the cold dump seems to depend on it for seeding. I don't think there's any doubt that we're entering a much better pattern vs the past 6 weeks. The block north of AK doesn't go anywhere in the LR...which is a very good thing. We may have to deal with some SWFEs beyond D9-10 with risk of taint as PNA relaxes...ala 94...but our cold air supply should remain solidly intact. There's a hint of a bit of reload near the end of the month which has a good chance of causing another round of suicide posts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 The block north of AK doesn't go anywhere in the LR...which is a very good thing. We may have to deal with some SWFEs beyond D9-10 with risk of taint as PNA relaxes...ala 94...but our cold air supply should remain solidly intact. There's a hint of a bit of reload near the end of the month which has a good chance of causing another round of suicide posts. \ That's the most stable feature yet. I think we'll have to walk the line a bit after day 10, but hopefully the EC caves the GEFS idea of a reload. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HIPPYVALLEY Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 It's hard not to ride the cold and dry train. The long range modeling does not look that stormy for us but I take solace in that the pattern is volatile and can change quickly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 \ That's the most stable feature yet. I think we'll have to walk the line a bit after day 10, but hopefully the EC caves the GEFS idea of a reload. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 \ That's the most stable feature yet. I think we'll have to walk the line a bit after day 10, but hopefully the EC caves the GEFS idea of a reload. Used to walking the line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bostonseminole Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 quick question, squalls with the arctic front? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 Euro looks great to me, reloads available, just enough cold lurking, overrunning , cold shots etc etc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 Euro ensembles def lower the PNA ridge out west by D10...but the block N of AK is primo...it keeps the airmass in Canada below average which is very important. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 Euro ensembles def lower the PNA ridge out west by D10...but the block N of AK is primo...it keeps the airmass in Canada below average which is very important. Snowy look Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 Euro ensembles def lower the PNA ridge out west by D10...but the block N of AK is primo...it keeps the airmass in Canada below average which is very important. How does 11-15 look? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.