Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,608
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Medium/Long Range Discussion Part 3


IWXwx

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

:lmao:

Good one.

 

That track I haven't seen too often in mid to late winter before. That's a classic late fall, early winter track.

Climo hasn't worked well for this winter either, I understand you want snow, but there are reasons why the GFS shows what it shows. Besides the teleconnections it is due to the phasing of the 2 streams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Climo hasn't worked well for this winter either, I understand you want snow, but there are reasons why the GFS shows what it shows. Besides the teleconnections it is due to the phasing of the 2 streams.

 

If it means getting rid of the split flow, then I'm all in! lol

 

I guess the storm does give some backlash snow to some members here.

I read some information a couple days ago in the main forum discussion that the western based block would reappear. Do you see that happening?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it means getting rid of the split flow, then I'm all in! lol

 

I guess the storm does given some backlash snow to some members here.

I read some information a couple days ago in the main forum discussion that the western based block would reappear. Do you see that happening?

Tough to say at this point to be honest. If it did it would probably be a little after the 1st.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At least that was an epic winter snow wise here.  Severe this year would add insult to injury to a horrible winter.  It might mean that the public thinks twice before hoping for a mild, snowless winter though.

 

No kidding. I know farmers don't wish for this type of winter weather.

 

---

 

A west based block is the last thing we need with drought still itching to get back into the subforum further, so hopefully it doesn't transpire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another setup with big potential but several waves, possibly 3 shown here on this run. Put the southern two as one phased system to come out as one in west TX and I'll be happy.

 

attachicon.gifgfsUS_500_avort_168.gif

 

The setup at 144 here in West seems conducive to what you mention here if that lead anomaly doesn't kick out too fast (and especially if it phases as the wave traverses the Four Corners area. This run reminds me a bit of a certain event where the GFS wanted to eject in multiple waves initially (and we'll see if the other models go against or with it), and it was during winter time.

 

gfs32013012300f144relv5.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks pretty hopeless for snow no matter where it goes.   The models are all saying the next cold lobe will take it's sweet old time.  :axe:

 

I'm starting to not count on anything beyond 72 hours nowadays. Medium range is purely speculation in my book.

 

This guy had some interesting thoughts on this system and is somewhat optimistic for things to turn around in the Midwest. 2nd entry down.

 

http://theweathercentre.blogspot.de/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because the MJO is the be all end all?

 

PNA goes negative before rapidly going positive, AO goes Positive and the NAO goes Neutral, those 3 will be more important than the MJO

I'm a little surprised the AO is forecast to go positive, given the effects of the SSW are still being felt. Usually when strong blocking regimes develop, they tend to persist. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cool, terrific, but I am not a storm chaser, and winter is not severe season.  I waited all summer for decent storms and they basically never came, a few garden-variety t'storms I guess.

 

Just because it is winter doesn't mean severe can't happen. As a matter of fact there has been several instances in the region of this happening in the last 5 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol, no ****.

 

This would be nice unless a feb clipper train sucks up futility records..  http://origin.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/people/wwang/cfsv2fcst/htmls/usT2me3Mon.html

 

What? He was the one who made the comment that Winter isn't severe season

 

As for that link, looks on par with what I am expecting for Feb, there is a chance we could end up with a cross-polar flow in the first half of the month which could really get things negative for the beginning of the month.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just because it is winter doesn't mean severe can't happen. As a matter of fact there has been several instances in the region of this happening in the last 5 years.

 

I'm not that dense that I think it can't happen, I'm just saying I only like severe in season, seeing severe before a decent snowstorm would add insult to injury and severe in winter doesn't seem right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not that dense that I think it can't happen, I'm just saying I only like severe in season, seeing severe before a decent snowstorm would add insult to injury and severe in winter doesn't seem right.

 

Considering the departures in the region any precip is better than none.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not that dense that I think it can't happen, I'm just saying I only like severe in season, seeing severe before a decent snowstorm would add insult to injury and severe in winter doesn't seem right.

 

Euro has a very GFS-like solution, with another huge warm sector, H85 temps to 10˚C almost to Milwaukee. That said, the SE Ridge shifted east a bit would encourage a wider area of moisture return.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...