Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,586
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

December 19th-20 Storm Thread II


Baroclinic Zone

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

5pm news casts were calling for about as much snow as you could for a storm 3 days out. Most said there is a great chance we get impacted significantly. Two stations even threw out the 12+ amounts if the "full potential" of the storm is reached. I except to hear people expecting a 1 to 2 foot storm tommorow at school :arrowhead: .

At this point I'll be pretty disapointed if I don't get warning critea, but of course theres still a chance I won't. Im cautiously optomistic for 12+ and my best storm in a few years, but of course I'll take any snow at this point with my .2" total on December 16th. :snowman::snowman:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5H is much less amplified so the storm doesn't respond until the upper levels go nuts...so that's why it looks weaker initially, because the upper level support is weaker.

Yeah this makes sense, Will. It doesn't get the necessary injection of northern stream energy as much, so I guess the mid and upper levels are weakened and thus the storm doesn't mature a CCB well.

GFS has flip flopped on every single run in a major way for days now. Every 6 hours is a dramatically different solution. ECM ensembles which include 51 members vs the GFS 12 (I think). Yet every 6 hours we had a dramatically different run (maybe except for 12/18 yesterday). GFS is unbelievable.

All the models have been flip-flopping. ECM went from showing no storm for 5 runs in a row, to a New England hit, to a HECS. We'll see where it goes at 0z but this is just a complicated timing issue that none of the models can really handle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL at the bridge jumpers. GFS does this EVERY single big snowstorm. it's why it's garabage. DOn't put any stock in it until 12z tomorrow..even then it won't be that accurate.

If the Euro has it now..lock that b**ch up

I've decided that I'll be disappointed with anything less than 15"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL at the bridge jumpers. GFS does this EVERY single big snowstorm. it's why it's garabage. DOn't put any stock in it until 12z tomorrow..even then it won't be that accurate.

If the Euro has it now..lock that b**ch up

But Reverend, the NAM was east too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think this is really the type of storm that does that; it's more of a Miller A threat where the whole coastline will get hammered if the southern stream is sharp enough as the 12z ECM showed, and to some extent earlier runs of the GFS. I could see why you're thinking this because of the potential for a late capture/retrograde at 5H, but I think if the southern shortwave comes in flat, the system is already going to develop too far offshore to hit anyone seriously. I basically see this as an all or nothing situation with the only middle ground being a light grazing for the Cape/SE Mass.

The 18z GFS also looks weaker with the CCB; the 12z GFS seemed to develop a much more coherent CCB with heavy precipitation, and its development occurred faster. The storm seems much more disorganized on both the 18z NAM and 18z GFS. Do you have any idea why, Will?

I posted all the 12Z maps in Phils grade the storm thread, hard to believe someone like you who can give the Nina state to the hundreth of a degree did not know what the UK showed. No absolutes in model land, the model fluctuations are just that. Stabilization should occur tomorrow.Off run slight fluctuations mean NADA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL at the bridge jumpers. GFS does this EVERY single big snowstorm. it's why it's garabage. DOn't put any stock in it until 12z tomorrow..even then it won't be that accurate.

If the Euro has it now..lock that b**ch up

I thought you would say garbage in garbage out, but that works. I don't think we need to concern ourselves with it at all. It's Euro time.

And JMA time, but that never ends.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This has got to be killing Ray ... an advertised KU under 100 hours and the poor sob can't even get login and weenie out with all of us. Yet another way that 2010 is putting his balls into a vise.

:lol:.....+ the big model improvement came RIGHT after I was locked out, then as I got back on it went to sh** again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But Reverend, the NAM was east too.

Haven't you guys learned anything over the years? When a big snow event is close..the American models lose it about 3-4 days out...then as we get within about 2 days and less they latch back onto it..The Euro has it and won;t lose it.

I don't understand why people do this when the NAM and GFS suddenly lose a storm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haven't you guys learned anything over the years? When a big snow event is close..the American models lose it about 3-4 days out...then as we get within about 2 days and less they latch back onto it..The Euro has it and won;t lose it.

I don't understand why people do this when the NAM and GFS suddenly lose a storm.

I was kidding for Christ sake lol, I've been here long enough to know this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All the models have been flip-flopping. ECM went from showing no storm for 5 runs in a row, to a New England hit, to a HECS. We'll see where it goes at 0z but this is just a complicated timing issue that none of the models can really handle.

Do not agree. Euro picked it up around d8-9...last weekend. Then lost it for 2-3 days and the GFS followed it. Then it came in hard last night as an outlier and guess who joined the party at 12Z. I can recall 3-4 days out this exact same thing happening in every major event that has clocked us here. Unless the Euro loses this, ride it. It almost NEVER is bringing you a storm you don't get. More often the other way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GFS has flip flopped on every single run in a major way for days now. Every 6 hours is a dramatically different solution. ECM ensembles which include 51 members vs the GFS 12 (I think). Yet every 6 hours we had a dramatically different run (maybe except for 12/18 yesterday). GFS is unbelievable.

The GFS has 20. The EC has 50.

A little comparison of the EC ENS and GEFS...

EC ENS: T399 (~45km) from 0-240hr and 62 vertical levels

GEFS: T190 (~85km) and 28.

Op runs

EC: T1279 (~14km) and 91

GFS: T574 (~28km) and 64

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While we obviously don't know the outcome...I will say this:

The euro may have had the wrong solution for a while, but you have to admire how consistent it is. The GFS is the king of waffles....I mean east-west-east-west..it's everywhere..lol. At least the euro may have been consistently wrong, but perhaps locks into the right idea and stays that way. So yes, maybe the GFS has the right idea, but it's so dam inconsistent sometimes. We'll know in 72 hrs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The GFS has 20. The EC has 50.

A little comparison of the EC ENS and GEFS...

EC ENS: T399 (~45km) from 0-240hr and 62 vertical levels

GEFS: T190 (~85km) and 28.

Op runs

EC: T1279 (~14km) and 91

GFS: T574 (~28km) and 64

Wow...I didn't know the resolution difference was that drastic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...