Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    18,112
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    happyclam13
    Newest Member
    happyclam13
    Joined

Thread specifically for Jan 6 Poss snow event


Damage In Tolland

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 155
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  On 1/2/2013 at 6:38 PM, CT Blizz said:

Yeah interesting to see models try to tickle something up again for the 6 th. I had a feeing yesterday that would happen. Still a ways to go but if we apply some meteorology to the models it makes sense there could be a 2-4 inch type event

 

Can't fully distinguish models from meteorology since the programming is entirely based on meteorology formulas and concepts.  This met vs. mod stuff is borne out of the 1970s and 1980s era when models were primative and mets had to use their experience and instinct to correct for obvious model errors.  Now mets aren't even sure when models are in error.  Case in point, a big snowstorm maybe last year or the year before when NCEP specifically said to disregard a particular model run because of significant model errors when that run showed a huge snowstorm up and down the coast.  Of course that supposedly tainted run turned out to herald in a huge model shift.

 

If you think you could apply some "meteorology" to the models, why couldn't NCEP programmers tweak the programming so that you wouldn't have to make that adjustment?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/3/2013 at 8:56 PM, CT Blizz said:

One more Euro run and we can plan on 1-2 inches I think

 

We're not there yet.  This is not a high QPF scenario so we're probably looking at a coating to an isolated inch.  With a SLP to our NW we cannot even count on much fluff factor.  Some places will probably record a trace or nothing.  This looks a little better for the Lakes and orographic locations.  h5 evolution is not very good as modeled right now.  And we haven't even had a "weenie" run to suggest anything better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/3/2013 at 9:29 PM, eduggs said:

We're not there yet.  This is not a high QPF scenario so we're probably looking at a coating to an isolated inch.  With a SLP to our NW we cannot even count on much fluff factor.  Some places will probably record a trace or nothing.  This looks a little better for the Lakes and orographic locations.  h5 evolution is not very good as modeled right now.  And we haven't even had a "weenie" run to suggest anything better.

 

In Kevn's world, the weenie run always exists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/4/2013 at 3:49 PM, forkyfork said:

it shows 1-2" here. no way that happens. i think most will be lucky to get .5"

 

I would not rule out snsh for the general area but it will probably not amount to much.  Temps will be in the low 30's across the area.  I'd agree with your assessment on amounts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...