Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,611
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Medium Range-Long Range thread


NaoPos

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Monday looks like another low level temperature issue, this is going to have a good amount of warm air ahead of the system and then it might get some cold air on the back side to change things over to snow. My best guess is for SE PA it's a rain to snow/mix with the best chance of accumulations being in the Poconos.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at 0z ECMWF Deterministic text for AVP, total precip is 1.22" .

I'm no expert but looks like it starts as snow then temp becomes an issue, .54" rain ?

Elevation I'm guessing will help so maybe wet snow / rain?

According to what's in front of me, 850's rise to 1.0C by 6Z Tuesday, by which time 0.41" has fallen at AVP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Monday looks like another low level temperature issue, this is going to have a good amount of warm air ahead of the system and then it might get some cold air on the back side to change things over to snow. My best guess is for SE PA it's a rain to snow/mix with the best chance of accumulations being in the Poconos.

If the GFS, EC, or some blend thereof is correct, I suspect any mixing at the end would be insignificant.  Its difficult to get a change back to snow on the back side of these systems in general, and the modeling suggests that any wraparound would be very light snow showers/flurries.  Like you said, best chance of accum in the Pocs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I agree. Guess I should have put flurries instead of changing to snow.

If the GFS, EC, or some blend thereof is correct, I suspect any mixing at the end would be insignificant.  Its difficult to get a change back to snow on the back side of these systems in general, and the modeling suggests that any wraparound would be very light snow showers/flurries.  Like you said, best chance of accum in the Pocs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6" for Abe according to 00z euro

That sounds like an overdone computer algorithm.  The raw data has 0.23" by 0Z Tuesday.  Another 0.35" by 6Z... BUT... by then 850's soar to +3C.  So, maybe 0.17-0.24" of that is snow.  I'd guess more like 4-5" snow, at best, at ABE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem is the block in the long range is about as useful as the eagles defense

 

After their strong defensive signings over the past few days, I wouldn't make that analogy unless you are referencing last year  :lmao:

 

Seems like the Canadian is most bullish with this one, both with the Saturday clipper AND the front-end thump on Monday before the torchy rain that follows. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am somewhat interested in the gfs storm show out towards day 7-8 as this is the first time it has gone away from the cutter idea in the long range. It has been somewhat more consistent in the 7-10 day range then the ecm with all it's fantasy snowstorms it's been cranking there this month.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All retrograding block periods usually see a modification of the cold air source that gets cut off over SE Canada. This is especially true during March. But, despite the calendar, there is a pretty decent supply of it under the block still being modeled for later next week. The source looks to cut off around Tuesday or Wednesday of next week from western Canada, but the modified pool of Arctic Air settles into the northern CONUS/SE Canada. That's pretty nutty for this time of year, but not unprecedented by any means.

The last time this happened was in 2006 during the same general time frame. That year featured a "near-miss" and generally boring weather for Philadelphia:

18 56 30 0 0 0

19 49 34 0 0 0

20 48 28 0 0 0

21 48 32 0 0 0

22 48 40 0 0 0

23 55 36 0 0 0

24 56 42 0 0 0

25 50 38 0.3 0 0

26 54 38 0.01 0 0

27 62 47 0 0 0

28 60 44 0 0 0

29 68 44 0 0 0

30 72 52 0 0 0

31 78 60 T 0 0

Will we miss again or is it possible we can pull off something like 1958? The key to this threat will be the way in which the waves from the West pull out. A simple, amplified wave that allows an easier interaction with the northern stream/dislodged PV over the Midwest would likely lead to a Miller A or hybrid A/B. If the flow comes in amplified but with several waves, interaction would likely be more difficult and probably lead to a near-miss. If the waves are weak, then it will also likely lead to a seaward track/weak system.

The Tropical Pacific this year seems more favorable to me than 2006 and more prone to producing a beefier southern wave.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also should mention that we are still in a retrograding NH anomaly pattern through 3/25 before possibly switching to progressive thereafter. This is always a time to watch for big storms. At the moment, the modeling has two distinct southern waves that come out and try to interact with the northern stream...both of which kind of fail. We'll see...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some other mid to late March data to consider is 1980 and 1984. The mid-March 1980 event (3/13-14) seems to have some resemblance to the modeling. The one at the very end of March 1980 seems too warm / spring-like for this set up.

A March 28-29, 1984 scenario is very possible with proper phasing. The way that system manifested has pretty good similarities to the large scale flow as this year. There was a lot of other events and even coastal storms earlier in that month, but the evolution in early-mid March 84' doesn't seem quite right.

March 1980 and 1984 also have a more comparable Pacific than 2006.

3/28-3/29 1984 and 3/14-3/15 1980 were pretty juicy storms in Philadelphia (1-2" of rain) with some snow (0.6" and 3.6" respectively):

3 27 1984 52 30 10 0

3 28 1984 40 36 123 -1

3 29 1984 37 33 82 6

3 30 1984 43 35 0 0

3 31 1984 50 33 0 0

3 12 1980 36 24 0 0

3 13 1980 34 29 133 28

3 14 1980 39 34 23 8

3 15 1980 44 32 0 0

3 16 1980 49 31 0 0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HM, without hyping it, the block as it retrogrades is beginning to look similar to 3/19/58. Though, wouldn't it be something though that after all these cutters in "good patterns" we finally get a LEGIT cold enforcer but it's so strong it squashes the low? LOL...

 

Todays 12z EURO looks like 58esque, except it 58 there was a northern stream disturbance that phased and help to blow up the low....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...