Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Medium Range-Long Range thread


NaoPos

Recommended Posts

This 500mb has tons of potential. Shortwave in central southern Canada would come down to reinforce the cold while we have the southern jet starting to finally crank. Could Feb 7-12th be the time frame for a major snowstorm? We don't have any blocking so we'd need better timing. It kind of reminds me of Feb 2010 imo. 

 

 

 

post-8091-0-40370700-1359389886_thumb.gi

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I did get a laugh at some of these photoshops of winter '12-'13 on a headstone..lol.

 

We'll see...I'll always have hope with a split flow look and ridging in NW Canada...sign me up anytime. Even a east based -NAO to "help" keep the PV and cold air source in Canada. Maybe it gets more hostile at towards the end of Feb.

I definitely think the end of February has "disaster" written all over it. Energy mets are cancelling week 2 right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like seeing signs of a subtropcial jet and a nice ridge in western canada but that realy doesn't get going until after the 11th or 12th of feb. before then, I don't see much more snow chances for DC to philly than clipper type events.  I think we tend to rush things in terms of the MJO. The AO ought to go negative and stay there awhile. 

 

You could definitely be right and this would give more weight possibly to the idea of 2/20-2/22 analog period having a better Mid Atlantic shot. However, I think the modeling is really having a tough time here with these cyclonic wave breakers in the N PAC, secondary strat warming to AO response and the two areas of tropical forcing. I wouldn't give up on the 2/7-2/12 period just yet. I agree that the first week is predominately northern stream.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I definitely think the end of February has "disaster" written all over it. Energy mets are cancelling week 2 right now.

 

Some of the strongest analogs are downright warm/snowless late Feb after a possible winter storm 2/20-2/22 through April. But, they do have notable teleconnections that if altered slightly would have meant a different outcome. Like I said this morning, I would probably be going warm too in March if I was in the hot seat but I'm not so sure it will be that simple this year.

 

All of the strongest analogs turn cold as we go into May. :axe:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of the strongest analogs are downright warm/snowless late Feb after a possible winter storm 2/20-2/22 through April. But, they do have notable teleconnections that if altered slightly would have meant a different outcome. Like I said this morning, I would probably be going warm too in March if I was in the hot seat but I'm not so sure it will be that simple this year.

 

All of the strongest analogs turn cold as we go into May. :axe:

 

 

Not sure if this is the case or not, but it has seemed to me that most Mays in the 2000-now period have been much cooler compared to April. We've been in a pattern that has favored generally fast starting springs, then a return of crappy weather in May.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first week or so of February looks conducive for mainly New England threats via late blooming short waves embedded in the very progressive northern stream. No big juicers coming out of the southern stream for at least another 7-10 days.

 

The Mid-atlantic's best window will likely come in the Feb 10th-20th period (classic President's day time frame) when the MJO reaches phase 1 and the AO is negative. However, be that as it may, NAO regions continue to look underwhelming going forward, so I'm not optimistic for a storm > 10" anywhere along I-95 (unless that progged pattern changes). SECS criteria might be the most we can muster but it would be greatly appreciated I'm sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure if this is the case or not, but it has seemed to me that most Mays in the 2000-now period have been much cooler compared to April. We've been in a pattern that has favored generally fast starting springs, then a return of crappy weather in May.

 

This is totally Phil centric: We have had four consecutive warm (top 33%) April and Mays in

a row. To have both months warm, its only occurred 21 times and 9 of them since 1990.

Beyond our backyard with May, I dont know. But we have lost the crappier (April in 

particular) springs of late.  If you notice too in spite of how snowy nh coverage is in the winter

all of the springs rapidly (become blo normal) have been losing snow cover.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is totally Phil centric: We have had four consecutive warm (top 33%) April and Mays in

a row. To have both months warm, its only occurred 21 times and 9 of them since 1990.

Beyond our backyard with May, I dont know. But we have lost the crappier (April in 

particular) springs of late.  If you notice too in spite of how snowy nh coverage is in the winter

all of the springs rapidly (become blo normal) have been losing snow cover.

I recall they blamed the lack of Sept NH snowcover and rapid summer melt back in the early part of the 2000s to the lowest world atmospheric volacanic ash levels since the 50s...we'll we're back to near or above normal in VA levels now and we still are getting that crazy summer melting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not good on pcpn event recognition beyond day 7, well maybe day 4, check that make it day 2. :whistle: . But the CPC 8-14 analog series is not that bad. Very few shutouts, most had light to moderate events. Largest one was the "no surprise" storm in Jan 2000.

Today's CPC D+8 and D+11 analog composite maps seem to be trender warmer and drier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we can keep the cold air source around in February it's showing signs that it will definitely be quiet active. First potential shot will be that clipper for sat night. The following week looks even better, but the question then becomes how much cold air will be around. This would be a good time to have somewhat of a -nao signature to hold that pv at bay over hudson bay. Without that we risk the threat for the cold air to move out and or a bad storm track. The newest update from the roundy mjo shows a pretty robust wave in phases 1-3. Could argue for another shot of some wintry weather, I know HM had touched upon this earlier. My only issue is will the pv have rotted away and moved back north by then.

2013.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mitchell, my weeklies man, how do they look tonight?

Not a good run. It does get quite a stormy but yields a pattern that would feature cutters and torches followed by a blast of normal air for a few days then yet another cutter. More signs of a se ridge on this run particularly the last week of Feb which looked well above normal. Not sure of which of these best describe tonight's long range EC.  :axe:  :yikes:  :grinch:  :cry:

I do think the PV has bit more staying power than this EC weekly run has. Again have  limited access for the weeklies, maybe the mean is better. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i suspect like their daddy Dr No they are only wrong when they indicate a period conducive to snow

 

in other words expect a second half of february torch

It seems that way.  But from what I read they have not been as accurate as last winter. I think week 2 was initially

ice box, then normal, now warm.  Good thing we are running out of time.  If one wants solace, one could always look

at the CFS2 weeklies, they are perpetually cold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems that way.  But from what I read they have not been as accurate as last winter. I think week 2 was initially

ice box, then normal, now warm.  Good thing we are running out of time.  If one wants solace, one could always look

at the CFS2 weeklies, they are perpetually cold.

 

CFSv2 is predicting that the current MJO will stay at significant amplitude and slowlyyyy propagate to over the Indian Ocean by the end of Feb. That would support more of a cold pattern over the US for the latter half of Feb. In reality, that MJO should be over the West Pacific by mid-to-late Feb. (if it maintains it amplitude and it has already weakened considerably since its Western Hemisphere transit), supporting a potential torch mid-to-late Feb over the US. I'm leaning towards the torch solution, but would really like to see the MJO signal regain sufficient amplitude before going all in. At the moment, I wouldn't trust the MJO as a med-range predictor of extra-tropical circulation.

 

 

realtimemjo.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...