Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,588
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

Medium Range-Long Range thread


NaoPos

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Well the nao has been in one extreme level or another the previous three winters.  There is no denying though that more extreme events have happened of late. I dont have the number in from of me, but PHL has had more 10" or greater events since 1996 than it did from 1950 through 1995.  I just wonder what one has to do for an old fashioned 4-8" snow? Maybe I have to find my typewriter.

 

Hey Tony - in the past 11 yrs Philly has recorded (8) 12" events, during the preceding (42) yrs I believe (9) such storms are on the books. During the 1940-50's we had a (16) yr period in which we didn't record a single 12" event so some young bucks currently going through a mid-winter crisis don't realize how good they've had it....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Tony - in the past 11 yrs Philly has recorded (8) 12" events, during the preceding (42) yrs I believe (9) such storms are on the books. During the 1940-50's we had a (16) yr period in which we didn't record a single 12" event so some young bucks currently going through a mid-winter crisis don't realize how good they've had it....

 

Carl,

 

Yes.  I even think of the 6 and 7 year stretches too without a single event above 6".

 

I'm not a stratospheric warming expert at all, so this is not posted with "red tag" wisdom: the EC site seems to bring the warming/ridging right down on the pole.  That should could keep a -ao going.  I suppose there can be winters with an ao/nao disconnect, but at the least the eastern Canadian vortex should not be able to retreat northward any time soon.  Can it exit east instead? IDK.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Carl,

 

Yes.  I even think of the 6 and 7 year stretches too without a single event above 6".

 

I'm not a stratospheric warming expert at all, so this is not posted with "red tag" wisdom: the EC site seems to bring the warming/ridging right down on the pole.  That should could keep a -ao going.  I suppose there can be winters with an ao/nao disconnect, but at the least the eastern Canadian vortex should not be able to retreat northward any time soon.  Can it exit east instead? IDK.

 

Good thing we didn't have internet in the early-mid 70s. On a slightly positive note the 12z is a little more robust with 5-day clipper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know HM and Adam, probably think other wise on this, but that 168 hr storm on the euro just looks very suspicious to me. Back in december you knew everything was going to cut. We had -pna, pv up by alaska, no real -nao, mjo wasn't favorable. This go around i just find that day 7 forecast suspect. Granted its not a strong block, but their is some form of ridging over green land holding that pv from escaping. The trof coming into the west also isn't that robust. I just don't see how that storm cuts into the western lakes with the huge pv sitting there and somewhat of greenland ridging. I could see the storm coming so far north then redveloping or a swfe event, but the track to wisconsin, totally moving that pv. Also, its not like the mjo is in a horrible phase. As of now its in phase 7 heading towards phase 8 (going off roundys), that doesn't scream cutter to me.

f168.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is almost verbatim what the GFS shows too. Pretty decent consistency for the moment between the two models. The thing that sucks is both are showing rain.

I know HM and Adam, probably think other wise on this, but that 168 hr storm on the euro just looks very suspicious to me. Back in december you knew everything was going to cut. We had -pna, pv up by alaska, no real -nao, mjo wasn't favorable. This go around i just find that day 7 forecast suspect. Granted its not a strong block, but their is some form of ridging over green land holding that pv from escaping. The trof coming into the west also isn't that robust. I just don't see how that storm cuts into the western lakes with the huge pv sitting there and somewhat of greenland ridging. I could see the storm coming so far north then redveloping or a swfe event, but the track to wisconsin, totally moving that pv. Also, its not like the mjo is in a horrible phase. As of now its in phase 7 heading towards phase 8 (going off roundys), that doesn't scream cutter to me.

f168.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know HM and Adam, probably think other wise on this, but that 168 hr storm on the euro just looks very suspicious to me. Back in december you knew everything was going to cut. We had -pna, pv up by alaska, no real -nao, mjo wasn't favorable. This go around i just find that day 7 forecast suspect. Granted its not a strong block, but their is some form of ridging over green land holding that pv from escaping. The trof coming into the west also isn't that robust. I just don't see how that storm cuts into the western lakes with the huge pv sitting there and somewhat of greenland ridging. I could see the storm coming so far north then redveloping or a swfe event, but the track to wisconsin, totally moving that pv. Also, its not like the mjo is in a horrible phase. As of now its in phase 7 heading towards phase 8 (going off roundys), that doesn't scream cutter to me.

f168.gif

The GFS also has a cutter in the same timeframe

 

f192.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The GFS also has a cutter in the same timeframe

 

 

This is almost verbatim what the GFS shows too. Pretty decent consistency for the moment between the two models. The thing that sucks is both are showing rain.

 

The gfs also has a different setup which argues for maybe a cutter. The gfs doesn't have any of the semi blocking like the euro does and moves the pv north before the storm. Also, if you look at the gfs, it isn't a cutter, its all northern stream related that stays to the north.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems to me that the climatology of the area almost always supports at least some type of snow event between February 4th and 9th. I went back and took just a cursory look at those dates for PHL from Wunderground and the NWS event summary from 1996-2012 and found the following.

 

1996 - Feb 7, 8  rain/snow 

1997 - Feb 8,9   snow

1998 - nothing

1999 - Feb 7,8  rain/snow

2000 - Feb 4,5 snow

2001 - Feb 5 rain/snow

2002 - Feb 7 rain/snow

2003 - Feb 6,7 snow

2004 - Feb 6 rain/snow

2005 - Feb 4 snow

2006 -  nothing

2007 -  Feb 7 snow

2008 - nothing

2009 - nothing

2010 - Feb 5,6,9 snow

2011 - Feb 5 rain/ snow, Feb 9 snow

2012 - Feb 8,9 snow

 

Seems that if last August you made a prediction for at least some snow during this period of February you would look pretty good.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know HM and Adam, probably think other wise on this, but that 168 hr storm on the euro just looks very suspicious to me. Back in december you knew everything was going to cut. We had -pna, pv up by alaska, no real -nao, mjo wasn't favorable. This go around i just find that day 7 forecast suspect. Granted its not a strong block, but their is some form of ridging over green land holding that pv from escaping. The trof coming into the west also isn't that robust. I just don't see how that storm cuts into the western lakes with the huge pv sitting there and somewhat of greenland ridging. I could see the storm coming so far north then redveloping or a swfe event, but the track to wisconsin, totally moving that pv. Also, its not like the mjo is in a horrible phase. As of now its in phase 7 heading towards phase 8 (going off roundys), that doesn't scream cutter to me.

 

A HM mentioned the other day, Euro is sending the PV into the Atlantic and on its way to Europe. The Euro ensembles have been more conservative in moving the PV around.

post-1201-0-79192300-1358455188_thumb.pn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The gfs also has a different setup which argues for maybe a cutter. The gfs doesn't have any of the semi blocking like the euro does and moves the pv north before the storm. Also, if you look at the gfs, it isn't a cutter, its all northern stream related that stays to the north.

Alot of us in the NYC sub-forum have been commenting on how the Euro solution looks suspect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Euro ensembles are more conservative, but the PNA has collapsed. 

That is after the storm, the time period of the storm is around day 8, the map below. Obviously their are a ton of solutions which is why it shows the 850s as cold as they are.

 

12zecmwfens850mbTSLPUS192.gif

here is the day after, so you see the euro ens are redeveloping.

12zecmwfens850mbTSLPUS216.gif

 

also, this is the day 6-10 h5 anamoly on the euro ens, that doesn't scream cutter at all to me.

 

12zECMWFENS6-10day850mbTempAnomalyNA.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tombo

 

Not really arguing your point that the cutter idea is bogus, but that in the long term the flow will go zonal.

sometimes, that is good if you have the right pattern. It will allow for more disturbances to traverse the country instead of this dry pattern. Just have to hope some sort of -nao develops to lock in the pv to allow storms to track under us or up the coast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sometimes, that is good if you have the right pattern. It will allow for more disturbances to traverse the country instead of this dry pattern. Just have to hope some sort of -nao develops to lock in the pv to allow storms to track under us or up the coast.

Last serious dip in the NAO occurred in late Oct early Nov that coincided with Sandy and the Nov snow (rising out of of a NAO bottom is always something to watch). Maybe HM can give some insight about the future of the NAO. Anywho I'll keep watching. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sometimes, that is good if you have the right pattern. It will allow for more disturbances to traverse the country instead of this dry pattern. Just have to hope some sort of -nao develops to lock in the pv to allow storms to track under us or up the coast.

 

Yeah I'd rather have a zonal pattern with a -NAO than a very positive PNA with supression of systems. At least you would have a chance at something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I'd rather have a zonal pattern with a -NAO than a very positive PNA with supression of systems. At least you would have a chance at something.

As long as that pv is over central or southern hudson bay, the cold air will be around usually and with the flow around it most storms would go under us or redevelop on the coast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...