am19psu Posted June 4, 2013 Share Posted June 4, 2013 Blah. K, thx. Pretty much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Lizard Posted June 4, 2013 Share Posted June 4, 2013 The FB person who posted this (he is a forum regular) doesn't seem to approve of TWC now following invests this way. Keeps the graphics people busy when it isn't Brutus/Luna/Nemo season, I suppose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metalicwx366 Posted June 4, 2013 Share Posted June 4, 2013 The FB person who posted this (he is a forum regular) doesn't seem to approve of TWC now following invests this way. Keeps the graphics people busy when it isn't Brutus/Luna/Nemo season, I suppose. Why doesn't he approve of it? I think it's great they do that. Carl Parker does a great analysis on TWC usually whenever he is on there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srain Posted June 4, 2013 Share Posted June 4, 2013 Not much of organizational change with 91L this morning. A mid level spin is currently S of New Orleans along a trough axis of general lower pressures extending from the Bay of Campeche on E toward the Florida Keys. The monsoonal gyre should remain highly sheared and little, if any real development is expected over the next couple of days. Heavy rainfall and possible flooding issues may be a concern for Cuba and the Florida Keys and S Florida the next couple of days as the disturbance generally moves N to NNE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quincy Posted June 4, 2013 Share Posted June 4, 2013 Look at these 0-3km helicity forecast values! Courtesy Twisterdata.com. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ground Scouring Posted June 4, 2013 Share Posted June 4, 2013 I know that the timing is inopportune for an unrelated topic, but the Hurricane Research Division has released part of its reanalysis for the 1941 and 1942 Atlantic seasons: http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/hurdat/1941_base_revised.gif http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/hurdat/1942_base_v3_revised.gif The remaining years 1943, 1944, and 1945 should be out within the next few days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wxmeddler Posted June 4, 2013 Share Posted June 4, 2013 Hurricane Hunter flight for this afternoon was canceled this morning by NHC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DopplerWx Posted June 4, 2013 Share Posted June 4, 2013 Westerly shear doing a number on 91L today. GFS showing the same solution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snow_Miser Posted June 4, 2013 Share Posted June 4, 2013 Up to 40%. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icebreaker5221 Posted June 4, 2013 Share Posted June 4, 2013 Looks like with recent success in TC prediction and model upgrades over the years, Bob Hart has extended the range at which his TC products are available. As of the 00Z Jun 3 run: http://moe.met.fsu.edu/tcgengifs/ ECMWF and ECMWF ensemble available out to 240 h (was 168 h) GFS out to 180 h (was 168 h) CMC out to 180 h (was 144 h) NAVGEM still only out to 144 h. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thegreatdr Posted June 4, 2013 Share Posted June 4, 2013 Why doesn't he approve of it? I think it's great they do that. Carl Parker does a great analysis on TWC usually whenever he is on there. The problem for me wasn't the relaying of the information about the disturbance. The information is out there, so why not use it. The problem was that the TWC anchor portrayed it as an "advisory", with a new one available "shortly". At 7:54 pm EDT. Compute data from ATCF is the first step in the advisory writing process, but not an advisory with a track and watches/warnings. Those are saved for systems NHC deems to be tropical and subtropical cyclones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
am19psu Posted June 4, 2013 Share Posted June 4, 2013 Oh. Hi. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#NoPoles Posted June 4, 2013 Share Posted June 4, 2013 Oh. Hi. omg, you do exist! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Marusak Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 so, question time for everyone. in your opinion, when 91l actually gets named, will it be a purely tropical system, or a sub-tropical/semi-tropical system? from what I am seeing on some of the phase diagrams and the guidance out there, I have to admit I'm thinking 40% chance of a regular tropical depression and 60% a sub-tropical storm. your thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phil882 Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 so, question time for everyone. in your opinion, when 91l actually gets named, will it be a purely tropical system, or a sub-tropical/semi-tropical system? from what I am seeing on some of the phase diagrams and the guidance out there, I have to admit I'm thinking 40% chance of a regular tropical depression and 60% a sub-tropical storm. your thoughts? Well it depends on why you think it should be given a particular classification. This is not a subtropical system in the same vein that Beryl was last year (at least not yet). The disturbance currently is primarily warm core. The biggest thing that gives it "subtropical-like" characteristics is its large radius of max wind which is more than 100 km away from the center as well as its far removed convection from the center. What this system is in reality is more akin to a "gyre" rather than a tropical cyclone. Gyre's traditionally have a broad wind maxima well outside the center with spokes of higher vorticity and convection around the outer flank, traditionally on the south and eastern quadrants of the system. One way of identifying a gyre is looking at a plot of Circulation. Circulation by definition is actually the total vorticity of a given area divided by that area. It allows you to pick up on larger scale features apart from the smaller scale vortices that rotate around gyre-like circulations. I've created an animation below that shows 850 hPa 700km circulation (shaded) with regular 850 hPa vorticity overlaid in black contours. I've also plotted wind vectors that increase in size (starting at 5 m/s) in order to illustrate the broad nature of the circulation that develops in the Gulf of Mexico (beyond 1 June). http://www.atmos.albany.edu/student/ppapin/lb13_img/special/20130604/circ_vort_gfs_gom.html What I want to drive home is the fact that the large-scale circulation is quite distinct from the smaller scale vorticies that are rotating around the larger-scale feature (see frames 20-35). This is a distinct contrast from most tropical cyclones, which have a focused vorticity maximum where the RMW lie within. Oftentimes with these gyre-like disturbances one of the vorticity spokes becomes the dominant fixture and TCs often develop on the NE flank of these disturbances. This is very similar to the evolution that Debby underwent last year. If a TC develops through this process with 91L, it likely will be primarily tropical in nature, although there is some chance the NHC will call it subtropical due to the large RMW. The storm has a limited amount of time for such a genesis, however. This is because there is a mid-latitude trough that will be picking up the system beyond 24 hours that will elongate the disturbance beyond recognition In the animation above, beyond frame 35 (6 June) the vorticity becomes increasingly elongated as the trough picks up what becomes of 91L and merges it with the vorticity associated with the non-tropical mid-latitude trough. Thus, 91L life as a tropical cyclone will be a short one, and its possible if one vorticity lobe does not become dominant, it will run out of time before TCG can occur. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HurricaneJosh Posted June 5, 2013 Author Share Posted June 5, 2013 The problem for me wasn't the relaying of the information about the disturbance. The information is out there, so why not use it. The problem was that the TWC anchor portrayed it as an "advisory", with a new one available "shortly". At 7:54 pm EDT. Compute data from ATCF is the first step in the advisory writing process, but not an advisory with a track and watches/warnings. Those are saved for systems NHC deems to be tropical and subtropical cyclones. Hey, what's up? Nice to see ya swingin' by. And, I agree with this post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HurricaneJosh Posted June 5, 2013 Author Share Posted June 5, 2013 Getting a bit bored with this disturbance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
am19psu Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 Getting a bit bored with this disturbance. Figured that was going to happen last Friday when they popped 90L on the remnants of Barbara. That's a long lead time for a something that is ultimately going to be a rain storm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HurricaneJosh Posted June 5, 2013 Author Share Posted June 5, 2013 Figured that was going to happen last Friday when they popped 90L on the remnants of Barbara. That's a long lead time for a something that is ultimately going to be a rain storm. lolz, next. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WxFreak11 Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 Looks like the window of opportunity is lessening quickly for 91L. Either way, named or not, lots of people getting too much rain on already saturated ground. Here in the Charleston area, we have had a ton of rain over the last few days with much more to come with this system coming up the coast. Ok..enough of 91L...next!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed Lizard Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 lolz, next. Almost two months before you can realistically become tight core snobby. Unless it is another 2005, but those are infrequent. I myself an encouraged by different people all seeming to like Florida, One or more Florida chases for you in August and September is just what the doctor ordered. And I sincerely hope at least one is a daytime landfall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phlwx Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 Figured that was going to happen last Friday when they popped 90L on the remnants of Barbara. That's a long lead time for a something that is ultimately going to be a rainstorm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phlwx Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 all seriousness put back in...it's a slop storm that might "earn" a name before landfall. If it doesn't, it's still going to bring a heaping of rain to the East Coast. I did lol at Sam Champion saying there was a 30% chance it could become a hurricane (not just a tropical cyclone) yesterday AM on GMA. Probably one of the better lol statements from the TV met realm in a while. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bryan Wood Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 all seriousness put back in...it's a slop storm that might "earn" a name before landfall. If it doesn't, it's still going to bring a heaping of rain to the East Coast. I did lol at Sam Champion saying there was a 30% chance it could become a hurricane (not just a tropical cyclone) yesterday AM on GMA. Probably one of the better lol statements from the TV met realm in a while. Well, They are the EXTREME team. Tropical Storms with a big flood threat apparently not EXTREME enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DopplerWx Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 GFS brings 91l more inland than previous runs, dropping 4-5" of rain up the EC. NAM still brings it inland over the fl panhandle and drops heavy rains on inland ga and upstate sc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crossthread Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 Hey, Josh! lookie here, I found a a TRIP OF A LIFE-TIME!...... The "Frying Pan Tower" is off the Cape Fear Coast... about some 45 miles.. This is just right up your ally.. HURRICANE TRIP: We will make this amazing trip very simple and straight forward. When a category 1 to 5 hurricane is coming by the Frying Pan Tower we will bring out adventurers who will be carried out and back by helicopter well in advance and after to live the life changing experience. It is a flat rate of $995 per person and may be a day or a week trip with limited communication and possible rationing of food stuffs required.If you are interested in this unique and possibly life threatening experience be aware that a liability release will be required and you may or may not survive the experience.All participants are required to make a full payment in advance may be 100% refunded if not used by 12/31/2013.Please let us know if you have any questions... If you need "info" I'll get it for ya... CT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amped Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 Lets see if the gfs holds this run. Nam is way west. However The gfs did much better with debbie last year and this is a similar setup. It may come a little west though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunny and Warm Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 Lets see if the gfs holds this run. Nam is way west. However The gfs did much better with debbie last year and this is a similar setup. It may come a little west though. I'd go with the Euro, which has been relatively steady for a few days now. GFS is now in line with the Euro. The NAM should be euthanized. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsentropicLift Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 The GFS is really dry now, takes a track right off the coast but everything is really sheared out by that point Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icebreaker5221 Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 The GFS is really dry now, takes a track right off the coast but everything is really sheared out by that point It's drier than the 6Z but actually still moister than the 00Z, take a look. Still has >6" for Tampa, >4" for Jacksonville, and >2" for much of eastern NC, so I wouldn't call that "really dry". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.