Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,584
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

12/30 Coastal Part II - Snowing Our Way Into NYE


Clinch Leatherwood

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

well you guys are saying i will be lucky to get a couple inches while not far away rips at two or three inches/hr and gets up to a foot.

i appreciate the honesty and i am inclined to agree having lived through it enough times prior.

better than being forecasted a lot of snow and being bummed out.

i cannot move so please dont anyone suggest that. i will keep out hope someday for a 1888 redux as long as i live in this area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NAM cools BDR from 36 at onset of precip to 32 during most precip, GON 35 down to 33.. I wouldn't really worry about temps for most of CT except immediate SE corner maybe, cape is different story until the "mega-band" really cranks over there..

You think I'm fine here? The meteorology says I'm fine with backing flow and dynamical cooling. Modelology says no. I tend to think ill be ok.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a quick note...The SREF snowfall probabilities will be underdone. A group of SREF members (the ARW ones) have not been producing any snowfall for the last several weeks because of a bug...and will not be fixed for a few weeks. This will therefore lower the SREF mean by default.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree. As of now, not a fan of how OKX is dealing with this.

I dont understand why they have 15 miles inland in southern CT getting 1-3" on the snow map.. Even BDR is forecast to be freezing and thats right on the water.. I think the 4-6" line should be all the way down to the coast.. And I'm almost certain there will be a 6-10" band somewhere in OKX, although they did mention somwhere might exceed 6"..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a quick note...The SREF snowfall probabilities will be underdone. A group of SREF members (the ARW ones) have not been producing any snowfall for the last several weeks because of a bug...and will not be fixed for a few weeks. This will therefore lower the SREF mean by default.

Did you find anything out about what's wrong with the NAM and when we can stop tossing it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You think I'm fine here? The meteorology says I'm fine with backing flow and dynamical cooling. Modelology says no. I tend to think ill be ok.

how far inland are you? I much rather be where you are than me today.. I might drive down there later if a band sets up just east of me.. the wife is working all day so I can go storm chasing today lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont understand why they have 15 miles inland in southern CT getting 1-3" on the snow map.. Even BDR is forecast to be freezing and thats right on the water.. I think the 4-6" line should be all the way down to the coast.. And I'm almost certain there will be a 6-10" band somewhere in OKX, although they did mention somwhere might exceed 6"..

I think new London and middlesex should be under a warning for 5-9" on average for the zones, personally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

meso models dont show heavy snow til 5 or 6pm even for CT, thats about 3 hours pushed back from last night.. i think steady snow between 2-4... becoming heavy 5 or 6pm til 8-10pm.. snow totals will depend on getting heavy snow for an hour or 4 or 5 hours like some might.. looking like this could be a 4 hour duration storm for some unlucky folks, maybe 10 hours for people on east..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...