Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,905
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    WichitaChiefSam
    Newest Member
    WichitaChiefSam
    Joined

The Interior/NW Suburbs Winter Thread


Guest Patrick

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 999
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  On 2/25/2013 at 3:40 PM, rgwp96 said:

use this one, at least a little more reasonable

 

http://wxcaster4.com/nam/CONUS1_ETA212_SFC_ACCUMSNOWFALL_60HR.gif

 

That was the map I was using lol. Noticed majority of the Pocono above 1,000 feet is in the 6-8. That blue 8-10 is the higher plateau regions of the Poconos in my county.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/25/2013 at 4:07 PM, H2Otown_WX said:

The NAM's precip. output looks a little ridiculous as usual. Maybe suffering from convectice feedback?

The 12z GFS and 12z NAM are nearly identical as far as QPF is concerned. 1.00-1.25"+ area wide. In fact the GFS is actually a tad wetter from the city north and east with 2.0" + of rain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/25/2013 at 4:12 PM, YanksFan27 said:

The 12z GFS and 12z NAM are nearly identical as far as QPF is concerned. 1.00-1.25"+ area wide. In fact the GFS is actually a tad wetter from the city north and east with 2.0" + of rain.

Yeah the GFS kind of drags out the precip. after 12z around here...has it lasting until 18z or maybe a little later. Not sure I buy that given the big burst of omega is between 06 and 12z.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/25/2013 at 4:02 PM, PoconoSnow said:

That was the map I was using lol. Noticed majority of the Pocono above 1,000 feet is in the 6-8. That blue 8-10 is the higher plateau regions of the Poconos in my county.

oh lol. thought u were using the one from here on the american board(Raleigh models)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/25/2013 at 4:12 PM, YanksFan27 said:

The 12z GFS and 12z NAM are nearly identical as far as QPF is concerned. 1.00-1.25"+ area wide. In fact the GFS is actually a tad wetter from the city north and east with 2.0" + of rain.

The 06z and the 12z NAM numbers for QPF shows 0.75 at 06z vs. 0.85 for 12z for KSWF. The 12z came in colder with 4.8" of snow with the 06z showing 1.4"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/25/2013 at 7:38 PM, Snowlover123 said:

The 12z ECMWF is definitely colder than the 00z run. At Hour 54 on the 00z run, the 850 0 C line is up by KMMU. At hour 42 on the 12z run, that 0 C line is south of SMQ. Pretty large tick colder. 2"+ for I-78 N and W on the ECMWF Accuweather Pro snowmaps.

Thanks....that's insane how different the GFS and Euro are this close to gametime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/25/2013 at 7:41 PM, sn0w said:

Thanks....that's insane how different the GFS and Euro are this close to gametime.

 

You're welcome.

 

It has close to 6 inches of snow for you in Putnam county.. this is definitely going to be interesting for the NW Burbs. As Jetski said, I wouldn't be surprised if this continues to trend colder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/25/2013 at 7:45 PM, Snowlover123 said:

You're welcome.

 

It has close to 6 inches of snow for you in Putnam county.. this is definitely going to be interesting for the NW Burbs. As Jetski said, I wouldn't be surprised if this continues to trend colder.

 

How is it looking for areas up here north of Sussex NJ ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...