weatherMA Posted December 25, 2012 Share Posted December 25, 2012 DT's map doesn't even make any sense. He has a 4" line north of a swath where you could possibly get as much as 8"? Yeah it's one thing to disagree but at least make a map that makes sense...terrible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted December 25, 2012 Share Posted December 25, 2012 DT has a pretty sharp cut off to his map, But he looks to have this area ok, Maybe a tad high Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Posted December 25, 2012 Share Posted December 25, 2012 This is his map. IMO doesn't really take into account the higher elevations of the Berkshires/Monadnocks/Worcester Hills...where there's good agreement for close to 6", if not higher Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teebrdsfan Posted December 25, 2012 Share Posted December 25, 2012 This is his map. 4-8 for the SE corner of NH? I doubt we see more than that over here. Lots could change, if nothing else this is a dynamic system and will be fun to watch tomorrow. Hoping for mounds of plowable... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Posted December 26, 2012 Share Posted December 26, 2012 4-8 for the SE corner of NH? I doubt we see more than that over here. Lots could change, if nothing else this is a dynamic system and will be fun to watch tomorrow. Hoping for mounds of plowable... Good point...I'm in Atkinson (next to Salem/Haverhill MA) and this could easily be one of those situations where we get 3" and Manchester gets 8". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OKpowdah Posted December 26, 2012 Share Posted December 26, 2012 Your 4-8 call for this area from yesterday looks dead balls on. Yeah I think your area is still in good shape. And I still feel alright with my map, so I don't think I'll fiddle with it at all tonight. I'll probably try to make a final call tomorrow morning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mahk_webstah Posted December 26, 2012 Share Posted December 26, 2012 I should also include the CMC in that group. Also trending toward a more prominent banded mode. what do you think this means, i.e. where do you think the bands will set up. I think a lot of the forecasts I've seen are conservative given qpf output. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted December 26, 2012 Share Posted December 26, 2012 Yeah I think your area is still in good shape. And I still feel alright with my map, so I don't think I'll fiddle with it at all tonight. I'll probably try to make a final call tomorrow morning. Don't you fiddle with that phallic map Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted December 26, 2012 Share Posted December 26, 2012 DT has a pretty sharp cut off to his map, But he looks to have this area ok, Maybe a tad high My 86 year old Mom could make your area map. Falalalalala lock it up for awesome snowmobile conditions through..... Uh maybe Feb? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowMan Posted December 26, 2012 Share Posted December 26, 2012 I like the call for 10-14 for my area as a start. Can always go up from there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OKpowdah Posted December 26, 2012 Share Posted December 26, 2012 what do you think this means, i.e. where do you think the bands will set up. I think a lot of the forecasts I've seen are conservative given qpf output. Depends on the exact track of the mid level low, but I think we could see banding enhancement from western Maine through central and southwest NH into north-central MA. I think 10-16" is reasonable wherever the band sets up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted December 26, 2012 Share Posted December 26, 2012 Don't you fiddle with that phallic map Phallic Phail. Sammy is now a grad student, map making 603 does not include Phallic fantatasic fun. his map looks damn good to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DomNH Posted December 26, 2012 Share Posted December 26, 2012 I like the call for 10-14 for my area as a start. Can always go up from there. I think it may be a bit ambitious but at least we're sure to see some heavy snow for a time and that's something we haven't had for a quite a long time and I'm looking forward to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobbieL241 Posted December 26, 2012 Share Posted December 26, 2012 He has both BDL and HFD in 3-8 inches of snow to sleet and never changes to plain rain Its close for HFD, its literally on the line, so probably about 3" then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
free_man Posted December 26, 2012 Share Posted December 26, 2012 DTs map isnt that bad. These systems of SE Us origin seem to be warmer than advertised. once an area flips to pl/r its hard to go back to accumulating snow, esp without a bombing/bombogenesis low to rid the ml taint and crash cf. 4-8 seems like a good conservative call for here anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowMan Posted December 26, 2012 Share Posted December 26, 2012 DTs map isnt that bad. These systems of SE Us origin seem to be warmer than advertised. once an area flips to pl/r its hard to go back to accumulating snow, esp without a bombing/bombogenesis low to rid the ml taint and crash cf. 4-8 seems like a good conservative call for here anyway. Don't be a Debbie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OKpowdah Posted December 26, 2012 Share Posted December 26, 2012 OKC 12 inches fail? IDK where DT came up with his forecast for tomorrow night. Rip and read NAM? lol yeah, no longer sad about missing out on the storm down there haha. Looks like they got a fair amount of ice and they're getting a lot of blowing snow right now. DT's map doesn't make much sense to me ... looks like a SWFE distribution more than anything else ... which I agree will be a component, but he's really missing the coastal aspect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted December 26, 2012 Share Posted December 26, 2012 DTs map isnt that bad. These systems of SE Us origin seem to be warmer than advertised. once an area flips to pl/r its hard to go back to accumulating snow, esp without a bombing/bombogenesis low to rid the ml taint and crash cf. 4-8 seems like a good conservative call for here anyway. You agree all of ORH county is all rain? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted December 26, 2012 Share Posted December 26, 2012 My 86 year old Mom could make your area map. Falalalalala lock it up for awesome snowmobile conditions through..... Uh maybe Feb? No we can ride longer then that steve, We ride right into march typically here, Jackman area i have rode in april and may if you go off trail Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherMA Posted December 26, 2012 Share Posted December 26, 2012 I commented on the map " less then 4 for Worcester?" and he linked me with a snowdepth map from the NAM post storm showing 2" lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wx2fish Posted December 26, 2012 Share Posted December 26, 2012 Good point...I'm in Atkinson (next to Salem/Haverhill MA) and this could easily be one of those situations where we get 3" and Manchester gets 8". First post on here...been lurking for a bit, work with coastalwx. I agree theyll be a pretty tight gradient in SE NH. Hopefully we can establish a decent CF to the south and keep the winds more NNE. I think we'll do pretty well, although i wouldnt mind being 25 miles nw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted December 26, 2012 Share Posted December 26, 2012 No we can ride longer then that steve, We ride right into march typically here, Jackman area i have rode in april and may if you go off trail oh I noes, was commented more on the fantastic conditions side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaineJayhawk Posted December 26, 2012 Share Posted December 26, 2012 I commented on the map " less then 4 for Worcester?" and he linked me with a snowdepth map from the NAM post storm showing 2" lol. Compelling evidence right there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted December 26, 2012 Share Posted December 26, 2012 I commented on the map " less then 4 for Worcester?" and he linked me with a snowdepth map from the NAM post storm showing 2" lol. I commented here it looked like a rip and read NAM map Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted December 26, 2012 Share Posted December 26, 2012 I commented on the map " less then 4 for Worcester?" and he linked me with a snowdepth map from the NAM post storm showing 2" lol. Riding the.NAM? Interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherMA Posted December 26, 2012 Share Posted December 26, 2012 Compelling evidence right there LOL. I responded asking why he likes the NAM for this...trying to be as serious as possible... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
free_man Posted December 26, 2012 Share Posted December 26, 2012 You agree all of ORH county is all rain? I said his map wasny bad. I would shift purple area east through orh/mdlsx/essex but that is a minor point in general. Also I dont like that it his last call, but he knows more than I Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted December 26, 2012 Share Posted December 26, 2012 First post on here...been lurking for a bit, work with coastalwx. I agree theyll be a pretty tight gradient in SE NH. Hopefully we can establish a decent CF to the south and keep the winds more NNE. I think we'll do pretty well, although i wouldnt mind being 25 miles nw. Welcome aboard, You better go on a posting frenzy if you want to catch Scooter........... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wxsniss Posted December 26, 2012 Share Posted December 26, 2012 P.S. I highly recommend saving regional radar images tonight. Incredible Agree... Same storm system, so we're only partly OT... Scary Christmas colors on Christmas day: (the couplet north of Jackson was a confirmed TOG) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted December 26, 2012 Share Posted December 26, 2012 LOL. I responded asking why he likes the NAM for this...trying to be as serious as possible... The Nam............. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.