dryslot Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 Wait three of the very best pro mets just spent a page on how bad the NAM thermal profiles have been and it's referenced for this storm. Uh probably an effort in futility. 2 words, Nam Blows Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 Wait three of the very best pro mets just spent a page on how bad the NAM thermal profiles have been and it's referenced for this storm. Uh probably an effort in futility. If you would just read my posts, never do I even say once the NAM was good or its solution will verify. I was merely pointing at the features and how it's adjustments were to them since this afternoon and how that may bode well for us down the road tomorrow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clinch Leatherwood Posted December 28, 2012 Author Share Posted December 28, 2012 RGEM was more amped right away too. Same old BS soon as systems fully exit the rockies that next main model run usually amps up. Now...does the RGEM introduce temp issues due to a CF again? Looks like it does over SE MA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowMan Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 RGEM was more amped right away too. Same old BS soon as systems fully exit the rockies that next main model run usually amps up. Now...does the RGEM introduce temp issues due to a CF again? Looks like it does over SE MA. On phone and map is small. How close did it come? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clinch Leatherwood Posted December 28, 2012 Author Share Posted December 28, 2012 On phone and map is small. How close did it come? 990mb about 39n 70w? Roughly speaking (the products are different the collaboration page puts out a different res/mb than the black and white) Black and white is 993 just under the BM maybe 1 click Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tropopause_Fold Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 RGEM goes boom. i think the NAM is only a couple of mbs weaker in the same spot at that hr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowMan Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 Is there a link where I can get the Rgem? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherMA Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 If you would just read my posts, never do I even say once the NAM was good or its solution will verify. I was merely pointing at the features and how it's adjustments were to them since this afternoon and how that may bode well for us down the road tomorrow. Uh was talking about Grandpas 700 level. RGEM is a solid 4-8 from BDL to Boston Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 RGEM was more amped right away too. Same old BS soon as systems fully exit the rockies that next main model run usually amps up. Now...does the RGEM introduce temp issues due to a CF again? Looks like it does over SE MA. I pointed this out before the 0z run how shortwaves and troughs over the southwestern states are poorly modeled. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowMan Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 We are in a good spot. Just a few more ticks NW and we all get good snows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clinch Leatherwood Posted December 28, 2012 Author Share Posted December 28, 2012 i think the NAM is only a couple of mbs weaker in the same spot at that hr Yeah, 3-6 mb weaker depending on the graphic. Also notable differences in the moisture fields. NAM probably is still catching up. Compared to the earlier GGEM Phil it's both stronger and 1-2 degrees further north as it crosses 70w. Nice move. THIS LINK IS THE 60hr OLD GEM FOR EASE OF COMPARISON. http://www.weatherof...ast/622_100.gif Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eduggs Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 RGEM goes boom. Little bit of an exaggeration. It's really not too far from other guidance. Definitely a nice light-moderate snowstorm on the RGEM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bostonseminole Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 Good start .. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 Not sure if this is the right map or not but its a better depiction................. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eduggs Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 Uh was talking about Grandpas 700 level. RGEM is a solid 4-8 from BDL to Boston I'm seeing 3-6, but interpretting snowfall acc from model QPF is guesswork anyway. If it happens like that, it will be great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowMan Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 Little bit of an exaggeration. It's really not too far from other guidance. Definitely a nice light-moderate snowstorm on the RGEM. Are you ever happy? Just wondering... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 Good placement of the high Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boston-winter08 Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 wow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bboughton Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clinch Leatherwood Posted December 28, 2012 Author Share Posted December 28, 2012 Little bit of an exaggeration. It's really not too far from other guidance. Definitely a nice light-moderate snowstorm on the RGEM. Had a longer post typed and yet again this site cannot seem to post correctly in IE 10. WTF. RGEM drops about 10mb in 5 hours after 42/43 hours. the storm is ripping along but there would be a very intense band of snow in SE NE in that situation - as the RGEM shows. NAM still is barely missing. It's quite a bit further north than the earlier GGEm, there is zero doubt about that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorEastermass128 Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 I'd take that and run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clinch Leatherwood Posted December 28, 2012 Author Share Posted December 28, 2012 Again just based on the RGEM, it spins a pretty nasty band up over SE MA as the low develops. About 11mb in 6 hours, not a bad rate of deepening as it passes. http://collaboration.cmc.ec.gc.ca/cmc/cmdn/pcpn_type/pcpn_type_gem_reg.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctsnowstorm628 Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 Rgem is solid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bostonseminole Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 Had a longer post typed and yet again this site cannot seem to post correctly in IE 10. WTF. RGEM drops about 10mb in 5 hours after 42/43 hours. the storm is ripping along but there would be a very intense band of snow in SE NE in that situation - as the RGEM shows. NAM still is barely missing. It's quite a bit further north than the earlier GGEm, there is zero doubt about that. I'm not sure if it's only IE10, I've had the same issue, when I post something it goes to the main forum page and post is not posted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 Had a longer post typed and yet again this site cannot seem to post correctly in IE 10. WTF. RGEM drops about 10mb in 5 hours after 42/43 hours. the storm is ripping along but there would be a very intense band of snow in SE NE in that situation - as the RGEM shows. NAM still is barely missing. It's quite a bit further north than the earlier GGEm, there is zero doubt about that. Happens to me often. My tablet is much more stable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 Looks like the shortwave crossed the border into Mexico per satellite. That means the trough is deeper, still digging, and the shortwave itself is stronger yet again than what the early 0z models are forecasting. All very good positives for tomorrow mornings 12z model runs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 I'm not sure if it's only IE10, I've had the same issue, when I post something it goes to the main forum page and post is not posted. Same for me or it just craps out... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowMan Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 Looks like the shortwave crossed the border into Mexico per satellite. That means the trough is deeper, still digging, and the shortwave itself is stronger yet again than what the early 0z models are forecasting. All very good positives for tomorrow mornings 12z model runs. It is nice to have room for NW movement and no have to worry about the low crossing SNE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctsnowstorm628 Posted December 28, 2012 Share Posted December 28, 2012 Looks like the shortwave crossed the border into Mexico per satellite. That means the trough is deeper, still digging, and the shortwave itself is stronger yet again than what the early 0z models are forecasting. All very good positives for tomorrow mornings 12z model runs. Agree. To what extent, we don't know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.