Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,885
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Dalon7302
    Newest Member
    Dalon7302
    Joined

Chill Storm Discussion and Obs


WinterWxLuvr

Recommended Posts

I wouldn't be surprised to see the gfs jump back towards the east this run as the models are really having trouble with the pattern over Canada though that might still not save most of us but could help you. IF so then of course the next run might jump back west again.

18z GFS is the only run Ji should look at. If it's bad, we're really in trouble..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

no one believe all snow but western burbs getting a few inches and then ice before rain seemed on the table

Wes makes a good point. With models struggling in Canada, I don't think you can say that solution is of the table. If anybody is 500mb savvy, you can see how the Vort lobe in Canada is all over the place on guidance, as well as that block.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wes, don't we have to wait until that PAC storm is onshore to see what the models ingest in terms of data? Or is that just with short waves?

Of course it's always nicer to that the shortwave that will produce the storm come into the conus so it can be resolved a little better but I think the bigger issue is the problems the models are having over canada.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The euro ens mean is ugly and really supports the operational and it's getting into a time range when it shouldn't be that bad. The depth of the low suggests that most of the members are in the same general area.

post-70-0-52604600-1356209498_thumb.gif

that's 6 hrs later than the 18Z NAM at 84 hrs with slp but NAM looks to be in line with the Euro, but not as strong with only a 1004 slp (6 hrs earlier, as I said)

http://mag.ncep.noaa...el=&imageSize=M

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it makes anyone feel any better the 18z NAM has the same setup as the old GFS idea. The block up in Canada is still there and the 500 and surface low placement is identical to the 0z GFS run. Maybe its a initialization or grid size issue. Or its the 84 hr nam and we're just gonna get rain. I'm leaning the latter.

~Snet form a deivce that cannot speel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it makes anyone feel any better the 18z NAM has the same setup as the old GFS idea. The block up in Canada is still there and the 500 and surface low placement is identical to the 0z GFS run. Maybe its a initialization or grid size issue. Or its the 84 hr nam and we're just gonna get rain. I'm leaning the latter.

~Snet form a deivce that cannot speel.

It is the NAM. Good try..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anybody remember a week or so ago when Wes told us over and over that the pattern favored a track to the north and West?

Seriously, there is really no point in going through all of this agony over these storms. Just read the updates from Wes. He is pretty much never wrong 5-10 days out and within 4 days he is deadly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anybody remember a week or so ago when Wes told us over and over that the pattern favored a track to the north and West?

Even if it transfers there are so many problems associated with that type of event. Could easily see a trend back east still..

But, this whole model thing is almost predictable.. we can't forecasts as well without them but sometimes I wonder if we really need as many and as often. Many times you see a forecast idea from further out end up having to vacillate with the models only to end up back nearer the original idea. Perhaps it's just random.

We don't do well with tricky setups here. I know some say 1/4" followed by rain is a win but it's a pretty small win if so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it makes anyone feel any better the 18z NAM has the same setup as the old GFS idea. The block up in Canada is still there and the 500 and surface low placement is identical to the 0z GFS run. Maybe its a initialization or grid size issue. Or its the 84 hr nam and we're just gonna get rain. I'm leaning the latter.

~Snet form a deivce that cannot speel.

The NAM is isnt a global model right? Which would be more likely to accurate with features in southern Canada because by the 84 panel the NAM and GFS are miles apart at 500 level in that region.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know exactly what you're saying Ian. For the most part, almost nobody looks passed 5 days. It's just weird with winter weather. There's a common interest with such a large groups of folks. Hurricanes too but still not as big as winter weenies.

I've been into it for as long as I can remember. Like many others as well. I even moved to the Rockies for 7 years because I was a very avid skier. I was probably into skiing so much because of the snow affliction.

For whatever really weird reason we all get attached to any and every snowy pattern and threat. I'm sure some shrink somewhere knows why. I sure don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...