Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

12/26-12/28 Potential Snow Threat


CooL

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 921
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Individual members are either west and warm, or east and a miss.

Seems like a fairly strong signal though for significant precip. (be it liquid or frozen), given the nature of ensemble runs and the relatively long lead time remaining for this potential event.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Development occurs way inland when compared to the 18z run.

Completely different.

If it gets anymore developed than what it is now, it likely goes further north. Already, I'm concerned about interaction with the northern stream of energy coming down over Minnesota while this one gets going. If the two manage a phase, we'll have another rain storm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a huge thing here which may be obvious to some is that regardless of the fact that our block flexes its muscles and confluence holds strong, if it wraps up too early redevelopment occurs too far W. It occurs enough south of the area its just a tad bit too far west as the low goes from the delmarva to just south of LI by 153

Edit: We all go back to snow after 153 so maybe slight dry slight warming/drizzle followed by dropping temps and backend snow, maybe another 3-6 or so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6z and 18z runs have been weird, but if you look at 00z to 12z today to now 00z tn there are some clear trends on the GFS.

Yeah definite moves towards the miller B, the secondary development is oh so painfully slow though, if you take this run literally and get that coastal transfer 12-18 hours earlier everyone stays snow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

its not a perfect run by any means but verbatim would be a 2-4+ event on christmas and formidable SECS/MECS favoring inland locations for this threat. Either way as depicted most of the area probably closes in on 8 inches after the 2 storms for the month if the GFS is to be believed.

after what this month has been id claim it a perfect run lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah definite moves towards the miller B, the secondary development is oh so painfully slow though, if you take this run literally and get that coastal transfer 12-18 hours earlier everyone stays snow.

Which is certainly possible with the block moving south and the CAD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...