Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,587
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

December 16-17 wintry obs/discussion


ORH_wxman

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 961
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Yeah but the pattern did work out as forecasted. I don't think any met on here is surprised by the turn of events. Would have been nice to have had a little luck to give us at least 1 storm threat but as modeled the pattern worked out pretty much AWT from 7-10 days out which is actually pretty impressive.

This is why the average public hates mets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol i'm cool

thats why i posted with "100% respect perspective"

i've noticed mets quick to be disgusted/annoyed when people seem to be upset for 5 mintues when it's time to admit a pattern didn't work out. yes the option was on the table and yes the option was on the table for anyone who likes snow to be somewhat let down things didn't go there way when it doesn't. seems normal on a board of humans dedicated to enjoying the winter.

I'm not upset in the least bit. What bothers me, is the reading comprehension of this board. When we say a statement like " There looks like we may see some sort of an AK ridge develop next week. We finally flush this crap out and the chances increase for more winter like appeals. It still could be more colder and drier and nothing noteworthy, but it's the best we've seen yet." It gets turned into this.."Wow winter finally comes in, the Euro ensembles day 8 show a snowstorm so we have that, Scooter sounds like winter is violently approaching." For some reason, the statements revealing how it might not work out get ignored and then everyone goes handlebars when the pattern isn't cold or snowy. Read the Met's posts fully. I can't stress that enough. Everyone here knows what I mean, I sure know all the mets do.

I also said yesterday that post 10th certainly didn't work out as hoped. I have no problem admitting that whatsoever. It's meteorology...if you can't take the heat, then stay out of the kitchen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also said yesterday that post 10th certainly didn't work out as hoped. I have no problem admitting that whatsoever. It's meteorology...if you can't take the heat, then stay out of the kitchen.

Exactly. There was certainly hope things would break right. While it never looked cold with this kind of pattern we had the chance of pulling something out. We just couldn't do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly. There was certainly hope things would break right. While it never looked cold with this kind of pattern we had the chance of pulling something out. We just couldn't do it.

Sometimes things like a crappy Pacific just linger longer. There's nothing we can do. I know people always hate when you talk about how it may happen, but also how it may not happen and can't give a concrete ansswer. However, that is weather. You have to explain all possibilties because that's what we face everyday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lost business to sandy cus lost home seat east queeens war zone red hook the poor of the poor wiped no food stores for miles Fri. took the cake with pure evil see ya .my folks the plate is FULL.Bosonfella and the ole timers i hope everyone is well and their families

Hey Jeff....so sorry you had to go through this! You'll always be an original. My thoughts are with you and if snow doesn't hurt you in this situation but make it more enjoyable for you...bring it! Although I think we're in a snowless rut...lol. My thoughts are with you buddy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I kind of think that the warmer resolution will have shifted what had yesterday been the "north of the mass pike" to more of a "north of Rt. 2" scenario with the timing of the mix/changeover moving correspondingly earlier.

Long and short of my thinking is that I'll enjoy this wintry spell for the short while I think it'll last.

Snow's easing off after the initial nice burst, down to 24.9/22.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes... because on the air we talk about D10-D14 weather patterns lol.

This is nonsense.

The public is led to believe that meteorologist have more predictive abilities than they actually possess. Mets are obligated to express a high degree of confidence and certainty, to develop and maintain an aura of credibility. And then the public evaluates those prediction based on overly simplistic metrics, like is it warm or cold... did it rain or snow? Which is unfair of course. But then at the last minute the met changes his or her forecast, with a smile, and pretends like he had it right all along.

This was not a well forecasted period by anybody, unless your only criteria is the most basic global flow pattern. Back to back to back rain storms to Canada (if it happens) was not anticipated, nor was a "pattern" that could support such a sequence. Saying things didn't break right but we had it basically right overall is blatantly dishonest, lazy, and a little insulting. Blaming it on the Pacific is obscenely oversimplistic. Or that the gradient set up too far north. That's the kind of thinking I used in middle school reading Gary Grey. What would it have to look like for someone to say they got it wrong?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not upset in the least bit. What bothers me, is the reading comprehension of this board. When we say a statement like " There looks like we may see some sort of an AK ridge develop next week. We finally flush this crap out and the chances increase for more winter like appeals. It still could be more colder and drier and nothing noteworthy, but it's the best we've seen yet." It gets turned into this.."Wow winter finally comes in, the Euro ensembles day 8 show a snowstorm so we have that, Scooter sounds like winter is violently approaching." For some reason, the statements revealing how it might not work out get ignored and then everyone goes handlebars when the pattern isn't cold or snowy. Read the Met's posts fully. I can't stress that enough. Everyone here knows what I mean, I sure know all the mets do.

I also said yesterday that post 10th certainly didn't work out as hoped. I have no problem admitting that whatsoever. It's meteorology...if you can't take the heat, then stay out of the kitchen.

scott the funny thing is one can't really discuss things not trending favorable, cause its often deemed " a meltdown" or some say the board is "unreadable". also, as I said to ryan I should have used "when none of our chances worked out" instead of pattern.snow lovers should not have a zero tolerance allotment of displaying dissapointment when none of our chances work out. It doesn't take a degree from harvard to understand people comprehend some patterns don't work out but we can still display a tiny bit of dissapointment when it becomes obvious they won't.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sometimes things like a crappy Pacific just linger longer. There's nothing we can do. I know people always hate when you talk about how it may happen, but also how it may not happen and can't give a concrete ansswer. However, that is weather. You have to explain all possibilties because that's what we face everyday.

Which is why we're still essentially at the mercy of weather models. And why the long range has very little utility in synoptic forecasting. I have been arguing for days that the mid range is the time to spot snowstorms (5-7 days... 8 if you're pushing it). And I think the latest developments help support that argument.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Light snow in Northampton/Amherst for about a half hour, but has tailed off now. Growth was ok initially, but got smaller quickly. Warm air apparently already present somewhere in the column and hard to think it gets much better. Looking forward to pics of snowmobile gangs terrorizing the trails in Maine later. Go pats tonight

Link to comment
Share on other sites

please go back to telling us about what each of the individual gfs ensemble members are showing. that was riveting.

This is a useless post. You offer nothing.

Synoptic forecasting is largely about statistics and probability. The ensemble spread at different time intervals (and its evolution) speaks to the relative probability of certain events unfolding. If we hypothesize that the final solution is within the ensemble envelope (often an incorrect assumption), the inter model ensemble overlap and outliers is both interesting and useful. It often sounds to me that your grasp of concepts is relatively shallow. Please prove me wrong on that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which is why we're still essentially at the mercy of weather models. And why the long range has very little utility in synoptic forecasting. I have been arguing for days that the mid range is the time to spot snowstorms (5-7 days... 8 if you're pushing it). And I think the latest developments help support that argument.

Of course that time period is best for individual events. That's not breaking news.

You are an angry individual. We try and act a bit more friendly around here. And I honestly hope you take some time away from the board or mods do it for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Post something intelligent. Anything. On any topic.

What do you want to talk about?

I come here to shoot the sh*t about the weather. It's not about proving who the smartest person is or is not.

I use this board to sift through ideas, post a few thoughts, listen to the thoughts of others and keep in touch with friends.

You apparently use this board as an outlet for frustration on a number of levels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...