Snow_Miser Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 Wow, this will be a slap in the face for many people if this were to verify after having days close to 60 a few days before.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 -20 850's to NYC on euro 510 thickness near NYC at 180 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allsnow Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 510 thickness near NYC at 180 504 at hr 174 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Isotherm Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 The persistence of the -EPO ridge is key in keeping the reload process going. The -NAO coupled with the -EPO will continue renewing troughs into the Lakes/Northeast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neblizzard Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 The persistence of the -EPO ridge is key in keeping the reload process going. The -NAO coupled with the -EPO will continue renewing troughs into the Lakes/Northeast. With the PV trapped in southern Canada, this cold pattern will be anything but transient lol . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaner587 Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 by hr 222 there is a massive west coast ridge and the PV blocked in canada just rotating around and around. Also it looks like a lobe of the PV breaks off around 210-216 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbc Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 504 at hr 174 Lol, music to my ears: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 I have my snuggies ready Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weathergun Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 by hr 222 there is a massive west coast ridge and the PV blocked in canada just rotating around and around. Also it looks like a lobe of the PV breaks off around 210-216 That second lobe of the PV is what the 12z GFS brings down to gives the Northeast and Northern Mid-Atlantic below 0 temps at 288hr: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forkyfork Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 hooray, cold and dry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KEITH L.I Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 hooray, cold and dry I know..do not like, unless there are some nice squalls with the arctic fronts..cold and dry bores me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snow_Miser Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 hooray, cold and dry FWIW the ECM weeklies were dry on week 2 but then were very wet weeks 3 and 4. We'll see how it goes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PB GFI Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 hooray, cold and dry If you build it. It "may" come. Firm up a pattern. Then sort out detes. It may not snow but w temps like these u may get ur chances Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jm1220 Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 Definitely a cold pattern, but snow chances will be quite limited outside of a lucky clipper with the east based NAO and suppressing pattern. Not many chances to phase and create real storm threats unless we can generate some kind of a block and/or PV split. The cold will definitely remind people what month it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnoSki14 Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 Ill take my chances with a nearby PV and cold air rather than what we're seeing now with regards to snow. Snow opportunities may pop up out of nowhere instead of at Day 8-10 which the weenies are usually obsessed with. This pattern change does look legit for once and not transient, the SSW and the PV on our side is a major change from say December, Eurasia did get very cold when they saw something similar last winter so there's a good chance we might actually experience true arctic air instead of just seasonal temps and snow will come eventually if that's the case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
famartin Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 Lol dec 20 i said we were goin into 3 weeks of great winter weather , you had 1 snowstorm go to your west - and one to your east , you were so clueless , you couldnt understand that we missed a great 3 weeks by 100 miles .Sometimes you get the pattern , but since it only snowed in the lower hudson valley, CT 3 times and New England but missed your shanty it was a bust . On jan 2 - i said write jan off til jan 20 - how did that work out ? You dont hav the capacity to make a forecast because you havent a clue what to look for Euro weeklies , Euro Ensembles , Korean , Japanese monthly neg epo - neg ao - neg nao all progged all vs ur 12z gfs lol which changes as much as your forecasts do . I am hiring a step stool for my trading desk , send me your resume , i think you fit the criteria Who was the one who said the first 10 days of January would be cold? Weren't you one of them? Average in Central Park for the first 10 days of January: +4.1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
famartin Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 Reminds me a bit of PDII with the long duration and relatively weak low pressure system. You don't need a rapidly deepening system to get a KU. The actual evolution of the storm is not very similar to PDII. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowGoose69 Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 The actual evolution of the storm is not very similar to PDII. It reminds me more of a setup from 96, not sure which storm though but I recall some sort of neverending wave train that rode up an arctic boundary off shore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
famartin Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 It reminds me more of a setup from 96, not sure which storm though but I recall some sort of neverending wave train that rode up an arctic boundary off shore. Sounds like you're thinking of Feb 2-3 that year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowGoose69 Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 Sounds like you're thinking of Feb 2-3 that year. Yeah, just looked it up...not too similar, the pattern was more into the colder period by the time it occurred...there was interestingly enough a suppressed wave a few days prior then the PV reoriented allowing the 2/2-2/3 event to come up the coast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CooL Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 Encouraging runs today yet again. All of the teloconnections are lining up to produce an arctic blast into our area. After the initial blast i think storms will start popping up as long as the pacific holds and the PV splits. The cold looks here to stay Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PB GFI Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 the 12Z GFS is almost comical - pulling the same crap it did back in December when it had similar low temps for the first few days of 2013 - we all know how that turned out http://wxweb.meteostar.com/sample/sample.shtml?text=kewr Hey man so is the Euro comical too ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rcad1 Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 I hope we're able to get some snow out of the up Coming pattern.. If not it's just a waste of cold air.... Just my opinion!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WintersGrasp Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 I'm still thinking many of us reach our average annual snowfall by the time February arrives Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edge Weather Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 Big and interesting things on this afternoon's Euro control run that just came out. Keep in mind, this model typically looks very similar to the operational run. I only look at this run because it sometimes looks quite different, and when it does, it sometimes means that it is on to something that the operational run is messing up. Very interesting things on this run. One is that it brings about 2 inches of snow to our area early on Tuesday morning as it rides a wave up along that front and throws some precip back into the cold air. Two is that it has another storm develop in the Gulf and come north, somewhat phasing with a storm dropping down through the Great Lakes, bringing significant snow as far north as from about Trenton to Sandy Hook and and for all of Long Island, just east of NYC on Thursday, and a couple of inches of snow north of that for the rest of us as well. This is very similar to what the Canadian model showed, but it does not completely phase it. It also shows the threat for the following Tuesday, with a big hit for New England, and a couple of inches for the rest of us as well. It continues to show further threats throughout the run to 360 hrs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 Nam at 84 hours has a nice look Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edge Weather Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 DGEX is a nice hit, it even manages to produce a coastal low off the coast of NJ on Tuesday. Gives everyone a few inches it looks like. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snow_Miser Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 DGEX is a nice hit, it even manages to produce a coastal low off the coast of NJ on Tuesday. Gives everyone a few inches it looks like. DGEX gives 0.5-0.75" of liquid for the city S and W. Not bad. Too bad it's the DGEX. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
green tube Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 Nam at 84 hours has a nice look lol. (literally, i laughed out loud) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snow_Miser Posted January 11, 2013 Share Posted January 11, 2013 Let's get a repeat of February 10 2010 please... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.