CooL Posted January 5, 2013 Share Posted January 5, 2013 Problem No semblance of an -nao would be a problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluewave Posted January 5, 2013 Share Posted January 5, 2013 1956...21.1"...11.6"...6.5"... 1958...15.9"...11.8"...4.7"... 1959.....6.7".....5.5"... 1960...18.5"...14.5"... 1964.....6.0".....4.9"... 1967...17.4".....9.8"... Wow Uncle, what a great 10 yr stretch for March snow.. That was back during the era when we actually got cold Marches here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Pamela Posted January 6, 2013 Share Posted January 6, 2013 "Real winter" starts north of a line from Boston to Danbury to the Delaware Water Gap / Stroudsburg, PA. Snowfall mean is 40" or greater north of that line and it is just cold enough on average that there is snow cover most years for many days during the winter. Everything south of that line is in the transitional zone / except for really high mountains like in MD or PA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeatherX Posted January 6, 2013 Share Posted January 6, 2013 No semblance of an -nao would be a problem. Nude. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CooL Posted January 6, 2013 Share Posted January 6, 2013 Euro and gfs complete opposites in the long range with the nao. Usually they are somewhat similar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nzucker Posted January 6, 2013 Share Posted January 6, 2013 Euro and gfs complete opposites in the long range with the nao. Usually they are somewhat similar Having the euro and euro ensembles on our side is probably more important than the gfs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CooL Posted January 6, 2013 Share Posted January 6, 2013 Having the euro and euro ensembles on our side is probably more important than the gfs. Yup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uncle W Posted January 6, 2013 Share Posted January 6, 2013 That was back during the era when we actually got cold Marches here. 5667.png 0112.png Biggest snowfalls 21.0" 3/12-14/1888 18.1" 3/7-8/1941 14.5" 3/3-4/1960 14.5" 3/1-2/1914 12.0" 3/15-16/1896 11.8" 3/20-21/1958 11.6" 3/18-19/1956 10.6" 3/13-14/1993 10.0" 3/2/1896 ..9.8" 3/21-22/1967 major storms are hard to come in March...that makes the period from 1956 to 1967 so amazing...March 57 comes in like a lion with 3" of snow...March 1968 came in like a lion with 6.6" of wet snow that started as rain the day before...Early March 1969 had a storm with 30" in Port Jervis NY...12" in Atlantic City but only 3" in NYC...It was an all snow event...We were in between the heavy stuff...A few days later another storm passed to far south for a major storm but did dump 3 more inches... March 1971 had a major storm early in the month...It was mostly rain in the city but started and ended as snow... 1960, 1964 and 1968 had leep year snow on February 29th... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jm1220 Posted January 6, 2013 Share Posted January 6, 2013 Having the euro and euro ensembles on our side is probably more important than the gfs. The PNA is so horrendous on today's Euro late in the run that it's still a warm pattern here despite the block. Looks like we will need at least some cooperation from the Pacific in order to turn things around for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tombo82685 Posted January 6, 2013 Share Posted January 6, 2013 The PNA is so horrendous on today's Euro late in the run that it's still a warm pattern here despite the block. Looks like we will need at least some cooperation from the Pacific in order to turn things around for us. Agreed, need that pac ridge to shift east. Euro's position would still argue for the presence of the se ridge, despite that -nao. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jefflaw77 Posted January 6, 2013 Share Posted January 6, 2013 Agreed, need that pac ridge to shift east. Euro's position would still argue for the presence of the se ridge, despite that -nao. Hasn't this been the problem all winter? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rcad1 Posted January 6, 2013 Share Posted January 6, 2013 So maybe by Feb 10 the pattern will finally change.. Just seems like were in this endless cycle and the cold air is always pushed Further away!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Absolute Humidity Posted January 6, 2013 Share Posted January 6, 2013 Biggest snowfalls 21.0" 3/12-14/1888 18.1" 3/7-8/1941 14.5" 3/3-4/1960 14.5" 3/1-2/1914 12.0" 3/15-16/1896 11.8" 3/20-21/1958 11.6" 3/18-19/1956 10.6" 3/13-14/1993 10.0" 3/2/1896 ..9.8" 3/21-22/1967 major storms are hard to come in March...that makes the period from 1956 to 1967 so amazing...March 57 comes in like a lion with 3" of snow...March 1968 came in like a lion with 6.6" of wet snow that started as rain the day before...Early March 1969 had a storm with 30" in Port Jervis NY...12" in Atlantic City but only 3" in NYC...It was an all snow event...We were in between the heavy stuff...A few days later another storm passed to far south for a major storm but did dump 3 more inches... March 1971 had a major storm early in the month...It was mostly rain in the city but started and ended as snow... 1960, 1964 and 1968 had leep year snow on February 29th... Didn't S.I. Receive 10" on March 1 - 3, 2009? I know we had anywhere from 10" to 15" here in Monmouth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tombo82685 Posted January 6, 2013 Share Posted January 6, 2013 Hasn't this been the problem all winter? Yup pretty much. Negative pna argues for se ridge usually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CooL Posted January 6, 2013 Share Posted January 6, 2013 GFS still the complete opposite of the euro through the 13th atleasts. SE ridge really doing work on us with no signs of a -nao Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted January 6, 2013 Share Posted January 6, 2013 Larry Cosgrove is barking big time about winter returning in late January through February. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Absolute Humidity Posted January 6, 2013 Share Posted January 6, 2013 FWIW. Nam sim radar looks to give some of us a coating this morning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted January 6, 2013 Share Posted January 6, 2013 Accuweather is honking about the pattern getting much colder http://www.accuweather.com/en/weather-news/nasty-cold-waves-could-be-in-t/3586088 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NEG NAO Posted January 6, 2013 Share Posted January 6, 2013 Accuweather is honking about the pattern getting much colder http://www.accuweather.com/en/weather-news/nasty-cold-waves-could-be-in-t/3586088 the major plus is if this verifies it is happening at the best time of winter last couple weeks of January- so all the obstacles are mostly gone - ie. too warm water temps - sun angle etc etc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowshack Posted January 6, 2013 Share Posted January 6, 2013 0z euro looks pretty good by d10, although GEFS has the trough much further west http://raleighwx.americanwx.com/models/euro/00zeuro850mbTSLPUS240.gif Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluewave Posted January 6, 2013 Share Posted January 6, 2013 0z euro looks pretty good by d10, although GEFS has the trough much further west http://raleighwx.americanwx.com/models/euro/00zeuro850mbTSLPUS240.gif The Euro ensemble mean isn't buying that OP run as the OP gets closed low happy D 8-10 sometimes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted January 6, 2013 Share Posted January 6, 2013 This looks nice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NEG NAO Posted January 6, 2013 Share Posted January 6, 2013 I think most folks hope that the tranquil weather pattern continues here in NYC metro so the recovery from Sandy can continue without interruption - 1 or 2 severe nor'easters could set them back weeks or months since it won't take much to flood those areas again..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edge Weather Posted January 6, 2013 Share Posted January 6, 2013 12z GFS has a pretty potent storm developing next week around 240 hrs out, and this is pretty much the same storm we talked about a few days ago, when it was at around 300 hrs. So, the models still have it, it is just a timing and placement issue at this point as to how far east that front gets and when the storm develops. The GFS develops it on Wednesday and brings it through Georgia, then bombs it into the Eastern Great Lakes down to 970mb, bringing us heavy flooding rains on Wednesday and Thursday next week. The Euro control run (more or less the extended version of the Euro run in much lower resolution)also develops the storm in the Gulf of Mexico, but not until Friday (two days later than the GFS), so there is more cold air in place in our area, and just like the GFS runs it through Georgia, but then off the coast near Cape Hatteras, where it then turns north off the coast on Saturday,with plenty of cold air in place in our area, with 850's at -5 and surface temps in the upper 20's. So, there continues to be decent agreement on the cold air working it's way into our area early next week and a storm developing, but there are still significant differences on timing. The GFS produces a massive flooding rainstorm on Wednesday into Thursday of next week, while the European Control run produces a significant Nor'easter snowstorm in our area the Saturday after next. We shall see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NEG NAO Posted January 6, 2013 Share Posted January 6, 2013 12z GFS has a pretty potent storm developing next week around 240 hrs out, and this is pretty much the same storm we talked about a few days ago, when it was at around 300 hrs. So, the models still have it, it is just a timing and placement issue at this point as to how far east that front gets and when the storm develops. The GFS develops it on Wednesday and brings it through Georgia, then bombs it into the Eastern Great Lakes down to 970mb, bringing us heavy flooding rains on Wednesday and Thursday next week. The Euro control run (more or less the extended version of the Euro run in much lower resolution)also develops the storm in the Gulf of Mexico, but not until Friday (two days later than the GFS), so there is more cold air in place in our area, and just like the GFS runs it through Georgia, but then off the coast near Cape Hatteras, where it then turns north off the coast on Saturday,with plenty of cold air in place in our area, with 850's at -5 and surface temps in the upper 20's. So, there continues to be decent agreement on the cold air working it's way into our area early next week and a storm developing, but there are still significant differences on timing. The GFS produces a massive flooding rainstorm on Wednesday into Thursday of next week, while the European Control run produces a significant Nor'easter snowstorm in our area the Saturday after next. We shall see. considering how bad the GFS has been past day 5 this season maybe even day 3 - can't even seriously consider any storms it has out past then............. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmagan Posted January 6, 2013 Share Posted January 6, 2013 Put away my shovels today. Did the same thing in late January last year and turned out pretty good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sampson Posted January 6, 2013 Share Posted January 6, 2013 Put away my shovels today. Did the same thing in late January last year and turned out pretty good. More proof that you are a super weenie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
famartin Posted January 6, 2013 Share Posted January 6, 2013 Put away my shovels today. Did the same thing in late January last year and turned out pretty good. It did? I don't remember much happening last year after late January. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PB GFI Posted January 6, 2013 Share Posted January 6, 2013 12z GFS has a pretty potent storm developing next week around 240 hrs out, and this is pretty much the same storm we talked about a few days ago, when it was at around 300 hrs. So, the models still have it, it is just a timing and placement issue at this point as to how far east that front gets and when the storm develops. The GFS develops it on Wednesday and brings it through Georgia, then bombs it into the Eastern Great Lakes down to 970mb, bringing us heavy flooding rains on Wednesday and Thursday next week. The Euro control run (more or less the extended version of the Euro run in much lower resolution)also develops the storm in the Gulf of Mexico, but not until Friday (two days later than the GFS), so there is more cold air in place in our area, and just like the GFS runs it through Georgia, but then off the coast near Cape Hatteras, where it then turns north off the coast on Saturday,with plenty of cold air in place in our area, with 850's at -5 and surface temps in the upper 20's. So, there continues to be decent agreement on the cold air working it's way into our area early next week and a storm developing, but there are still significant differences on timing. The GFS produces a massive flooding rainstorm on Wednesday into Thursday of next week, while the European Control run produces a significant Nor'easter snowstorm in our area the Saturday after next. We shall see. huh u will not see an inch of snow in the next 10 to 15 days. U do realize that this is a bonafide warm up coming. And there will b zero support for snow in ths area thru that period Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmagan Posted January 6, 2013 Share Posted January 6, 2013 It did? I don't remember much happening last year after late January. That is the point, I removed the gas from the snow thrower, put away the shovels and there were no more significant snowfalls the rest of that winter. I am not saying there will not be any significant snow the rest of the winter, but there is no use having them out there right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.