bluewave Posted January 4, 2013 Share Posted January 4, 2013 When I first saw Mondays Euro weeklies I was in that camp too , but when the Euro weeklies came to the CFS last nite I thnk the warm up is 2 weeks not the whole month . The canadanian cold will migrate out west fist . but the core of the coldest air , ( see bluewave ) is forecasted day 10 on our side of the pole , and that didnt happen one time last year . So once that trof comes back east around the 20th , we are goin to have some real air to deal with . What happens after that is too far to really see . The last time that we had the coldest air was all the way back during the beginning of February 2011 when Oklahoma set the record for their coldest temperature. It will be interesting to see how much cold and Arctic high pressure the Euro builds over NW Canada the next 10 days or so. NYC was able to briefly dip below 10 degrees about a week or two before that record low. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PB GFI Posted January 4, 2013 Share Posted January 4, 2013 The last time that we had the coldest air was all the way back during the beginning of February 2011 when Oklahoma set the record for their coldest temperature. It will be interesting to see how much cold and Arctic high pressure the Euro builds over NW Canada the next 10 days or so. NYC was able to briefly dip below 10 degrees about a week or two before that record low. The block on the Euro week 4 isnt as intense as you would wana see, but it looked much better than Mondays run ( where it showed nothing ) , hoping its the begining of a trend onthe EURO and will be interested to see its week 3 look Monday . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathermedic Posted January 4, 2013 Share Posted January 4, 2013 Fwiw Lee Goldberg (WABC-TV met) has been saying the past two nights on the news that he thinks the last 2 weeks of January will get more interesting around here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmagan Posted January 4, 2013 Share Posted January 4, 2013 Fwiw Lee Goldberg (WABC-TV met) has been saying the past two nights on the news that he thinks the last 2 weeks of January will get more interesting around here. Well, if you compare it to now, anything is more interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluewave Posted January 4, 2013 Share Posted January 4, 2013 The block on the Euro week 4 isnt as intense as you would wana see, but it looked much better than Mondays run ( where it showed nothing ) , hoping its the begining of a trend onthe EURO and will be interested to see its week 3 look Monday . We would need the PNA to rise enough to let the PV drop down from around NW Canada in 10 days or so to a position south of James Bay between January 20-31. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PB GFI Posted January 4, 2013 Share Posted January 4, 2013 We would need the PNA to rise enough to let the PV drop down from around NW Canada in 10 days or so to a position south of James Bay between January 20-31. The CFS brings the cold back after the 16 th , I think that's a little aggressive. The Euro weeklies point to week 4 say around the 23 rd , which is probably more reasonable . Was reading Alan Huffman he doesn't think u get a PNA spike til the later period. So I like your time frame . I will not b unhappy with a week of 50s if there's a payoff at the end the road Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Pamela Posted January 5, 2013 Share Posted January 5, 2013 Mean temperature departure from normal at Central Park -0.3 F last 14 days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Pamela Posted January 5, 2013 Share Posted January 5, 2013 I can't quite see how one could be happy with the GFS when the 6z run takes 10 to 12 days to push a simple cold front through in the dead of winter... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmagan Posted January 5, 2013 Share Posted January 5, 2013 I can't quite see how one could be happy with the GFS when the 6z run takes 10 to 12 days to push a cold front through in the dead of winter... SE ridge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Pamela Posted January 5, 2013 Share Posted January 5, 2013 54 days until March 1st....at one time, I was a big defender of March as a winter month...over the last 5 years, I am starting to wonder...save for the first 48 hours in 2009...March has produced zip during that span. What is *more* disturbing is that it has not even been close to producing...I can't even recall SNE having anything significant recently in that month...save for the March 1-2, 2009 storm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mulen Posted January 5, 2013 Share Posted January 5, 2013 One day at a time dudes ten days out ma nature gonna due her thing and were powerless over it. She's very humbling to us humans the weather around the world is usally turbulant somewhere all the time relax this is small stuff. peace Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluewave Posted January 5, 2013 Share Posted January 5, 2013 54 days until March 1st....at one time, I was a big defender of March as a winter month...over the last 5 years, I am starting to wonder...save for the first 48 hours in 2009...March has produced zip during that span. What is *more* disturbing is that it has not even been close to producing...I can't even recall SNE having anything significant recently in that month...save for the March 1-2, 2009 storm. Each other month from October to February produced a top ten snowiest since 2010 here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Pamela Posted January 5, 2013 Share Posted January 5, 2013 Each other month from October to February produced a top ten snowiest since 2010 here. With 147 mostly crappy winters on the books, is it really such a big accomplishment? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NEG NAO Posted January 5, 2013 Share Posted January 5, 2013 This snow cover map JB is posting is not accurate - shows snow cover in central NJ and there hasn't been any for days http://twitter.com/BigJoeBastardi/status/287574496301416448/photo/1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowshack Posted January 5, 2013 Share Posted January 5, 2013 54 days until March 1st....at one time, I was a big defender of March as a winter month...over the last 5 years, I am starting to wonder...save for the first 48 hours in 2009...March has produced zip during that span. What is *more* disturbing is that it has not even been close to producing...I can't even recall SNE having anything significant recently in that month...save for the March 1-2, 2009 storm. Since we've seen some pre-season wintry events the last two years, it stands to reason that sooner or later we'll see some March events again as well. I like March events that follow a wintry February, and potentially extend days of snowcover or continue the overall wintry feel. The great '95/'96 had that. '11/'12 could have used a good March. But if Feb is a dud, Id rather not even see the slushy couple of inches in March with subsequent days in the 40's and 50's. Hopefully the late month potential delivers, although it sure seems as though we need alot of things to break in our favor once again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmagan Posted January 5, 2013 Share Posted January 5, 2013 If I am looking correctly, KISP hasn't been below zero since 1988. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
famartin Posted January 5, 2013 Share Posted January 5, 2013 If I am looking correctly, KISP hasn't been below zero since 1988. Correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uncle W Posted January 5, 2013 Share Posted January 5, 2013 the best March's were...(4" storms or more)...1960 was the coldest......1956...21.1"...11.6"...6.5"...1958...15.9"...11.8"...4.7"...1959.....6.7".....5.5"...1960...18.5"...14.5"...1964.....6.0".....4.9"...1967...17.4".....9.8"... 1968.....6.1".....6.6"...2/29 to 3/1... 5.5" 3/11970.....4.0".....4.0"...1976.....4.4".....4.2"...1978.....6.8".....5.0"...1980.....4.6".....4.6"...1981.....8.6".....8.6"...1984...11.9".....6.9"...1992.....9.4".....6.2"...1993...11.9"...10.2"...1994.....8.1".....5.0"...1996...13.2".....4.6".....4.5".....4.1"...1999.....4.5".....4.5"...2004.....4.8".....4.0"...2005.....6.9".....7.7"...2/28 to 3/1 ... 2.9" 3/12007.....5.5".....5.5"...2009.....8.3".....8.3"... Since we've seen some pre-season wintry events the last two years, it stands to reason that sooner or later we'll see some March events again as well. I like March events that follow a wintry February, and potentially extend days of snowcover or continue the overall wintry feel. The great '95/'96 had that. '11/'12 could have used a good March. But if Feb is a dud, Id rather not even see the slushy couple of inches in March with subsequent days in the 40's and 50's. Hopefully the late month potential delivers, although it sure seems as though we need alot of things to break in our favor once again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmagan Posted January 5, 2013 Share Posted January 5, 2013 Correct. I see you are just above zero. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IsentropicLift Posted January 5, 2013 Share Posted January 5, 2013 This snow cover map JB is posting is not accurate - shows snow cover in central NJ and there hasn't been any for days http://twitter.com/BigJoeBastardi/status/287574496301416448/photo/1 there is still a healthy snow cover here. Morris County, NJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jm1220 Posted January 5, 2013 Share Posted January 5, 2013 Since we've seen some pre-season wintry events the last two years, it stands to reason that sooner or later we'll see some March events again as well. I like March events that follow a wintry February, and potentially extend days of snowcover or continue the overall wintry feel. The great '95/'96 had that. '11/'12 could have used a good March. But if Feb is a dud, Id rather not even see the slushy couple of inches in March with subsequent days in the 40's and 50's. Hopefully the late month potential delivers, although it sure seems as though we need alot of things to break in our favor once again. The PNA and EPO is so atrocious that even a block in Greenland like the one advertised on the Euro late in the run does nothing to end the SE Ridge and endless cutters. With our luck, the +PNA will come back in time for the NAO block to disappear and we go cold/dry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nzucker Posted January 5, 2013 Share Posted January 5, 2013 March 1958 was an absolute monster here in Westchester and had two 12"+ storms, both later in the month, following a very snowy and cold Feb 1958. March 1960 was also great with the storm early in the month dumping 28" in Dobbs Ferry. It's true that March has been a disappointment lately, and I can understand why some are becoming disillusioned. The last solid March was 2005...my favorite was March 2004 which had two 6"+ events around the equinox. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
famartin Posted January 5, 2013 Share Posted January 5, 2013 I see you are just above zero. Weather at my place the last few days... http://www.wunderground.com/weatherstation/WXDailyHistory.asp?ID=KNVELKO7&day=5&year=2013&month=1&graphspan=month Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uncle W Posted January 5, 2013 Share Posted January 5, 2013 March 1958 was an absolute monster here in Westchester and had two 12"+ storms, both later in the month, following a very snowy and cold Feb 1958. March 1960 was also great with the storm early in the month dumping 28" in Dobbs Ferry. It's true that March has been a disappointment lately, and I can understand why some are becoming disillusioned. The last solid March was 2005...my favorite was March 2004 which had two 6"+ events around the equinox. I remember March 1956 and 58 faintly..1960 is still fresh in my mind...14" with heavy drifts made it seem bigger...Was supposed to change to rain...Record cold followed the storm...March 67 had a snowy period from the 15th to 22nd...3" on 3/17 with temps in the teens most of the day...NYC had single digit temps on the 18th while other places went below zero...1993 was the last great March and 2005 wasn't bad... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowshack Posted January 5, 2013 Share Posted January 5, 2013 1956...21.1"...11.6"...6.5"...1958...15.9"...11.8"...4.7"...1959.....6.7".....5.5"...1960...18.5"...14.5"...1964.....6.0".....4.9"...1967...17.4".....9.8"... Wow Uncle, what a great 10 yr stretch for March snow.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted January 5, 2013 Share Posted January 5, 2013 Freefall http://raleighwx.americanwx.com/models/euro/12zecmwfnao.gif Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowshack Posted January 5, 2013 Share Posted January 5, 2013 Freefall http://raleighwx.americanwx.com/models/euro/12zecmwfnao.gif And then there's always the GFS http://raleighwx.americanwx.com/models/gfs/18zgfsnao.gif http://raleighwx.americanwx.com/models/gfs/12zgfsnao.gif Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CooL Posted January 5, 2013 Share Posted January 5, 2013 Gfs looks awful Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeatherX Posted January 5, 2013 Share Posted January 5, 2013 Gfs looks awful Problem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowshack Posted January 5, 2013 Share Posted January 5, 2013 Gfs looks awful 6z had the block in a decent location, the last two runs have lost it. Eh, at this range it will flip and flop many times, but theres not much else of interest to watch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.