Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,584
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

A new Baby, a fresh approach


Ginx snewx

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

From an orbital perspective - it is rare to have this sort of amplitude along/off the EC when the flow is so flat in the west. That "flat" appeal, might also have to do with abnormally high wave frequency in the flow damping a background ridge signal... Which is interesting... the flow into N/A may actually be more +PNAP in nature, only "looks" -PNA'ish

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Euro really never gets the 850 0C line much further north than this panel...its because there is a weak block to the north of this system and the high pressure just stays rotting in Quebec. Its the classic Dec '92 look on that front. If you ever loop the Dec '92 storm on the NARR ewall maps, you'll see what I mean.

A torching rainstorm isn't out of the possibility though. Its just if we had a high anchored in Quebec...even if it is not as fresh as it was several days earlier...that prevents some warmer solutions from occurring.

Yeah I see that now... thank god that cuts off so far south. That looks epic for a lot of the interior and elevated. Deck destroyer 32F paste.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dec 1992 is my 2nd favorite event...absolutely magical...about 20" of cement, after a couple of inches of pelting rain.

What a way to herald in a snowy regime after the meterological "armpit era" of the late 80's-early 90's...my childhood.

First huge event I really got to enjoy, and comprehend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I just said, the second wave in a series tends to be emphasized in the end. Probably will see some see-saw action between these two disturbances in the model forecasts, but more likely than not, we see the second wave much weaker than the Euro had last night

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol... so if it ends up as a torching rainstorm for a chunk of the posters, it certainly wasn't because there wasn't any cold air around right?

if it wound up that way it would have 0, NOTHING, ZILCH, NO correlation to these runs - it would be for mere coincidence at this time range, particularly when you have a synoptic polar high in eastern Ontario with clear dam nose into New England.

None of these runs are dynamically accurate, either. Granted, modeling has come a long way since 1992 - still, even 24 hour before that storm we were supposed to get nothing but rain in the Merrimack Valley where I went to college, and we wound up with 4" of slush, then another 13.5" of powder over top, and that was after a solid 4" of rain went in the gauge.

Ugh -

btw, 1992 was recently sited as an analog for the time frame in question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Euro really never gets the 850 0C line much further north than this panel...its because there is a weak block to the north of this system and the high pressure just stays rotting in Quebec. Its the classic Dec '92 look on that front. If you ever loop the Dec '92 storm on the NARR ewall maps, you'll see what I mean.

A torching rainstorm isn't out of the possibility though. Its just if we had a high anchored in Quebec...even if it is not as fresh as it was several days earlier...that prevents some warmer solutions from occurring.

Seems like this scenario would end up as snow (after a nice soaking rain) even down in my neck of the woods.

I'm with Ryan, though; no way we pull three solid out of this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if it wound up that way it would have 0, NOTHING, ZILCH, NO correlation to these runs - it would be for mere coincidence at this time range, particularly when you have a synoptic polar high in eastern Ontario with clear dam nose into New England.

None of these runs are dynamically accurate, either. Granted, modeling has come a long way since 1992 - still, even 24 hour before that storm we were supposed to get nothing but rain in the Merrimack Valley where I went to college, and we wound up with 4" of slush, then another 13.5" of powder over top, and that was after a solid 4" of rain went in the gauge.

Ugh -

btw, 1992 was recently sited as an analog for the time frame in question.

I disagree.

A colder source region could most definitely be a game changer for the CP and southeast areas. it might not make a difference in the interior...as it would be the difference between 18" of powder or a foot of cement....but Dec '92 (which is a great example) rained for 80% of the storm in Boston, and in SE MA where blizzard wanrings were eventually raised in mid-storm, never really cashed in due to a very marginal BL situation. Heck, even in Dec '92 I was raining in ORH for hours in that in the beginning...cannot convince that a fresher air mass in that situation would have led to an even snowier outcome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL maybe. This solution would just be awesome. Do they ever cancel finals? haha

Not while I was there ... didn't get much to test it though lol:

Dec 2009 ... blizzard was way south of here

Dec 2010 ... nothing good until Boxing Day

Dec 2011 ... hah! that's funny ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Soo dec 92 was being thrown around earlier...yeahhh

What an epic rain bomb/coastal flooder on the euro today, which switches to a blue bomb for the interior/high elevs and even eventually coastal new england...so much going on at 500 mb in this pattern so needless to say it will change a million times.

I wouldn't give up on colder solution, particularly in the 2nd half for you guys in your part of the MA. I could definitely visualize a flash collapse of a rain snow line about mid way through, as the dynamics maximize and the BL wind in NJ goes more NNE as opposed to ENE.

Also, though the 168 panel is impressive, the dynamics don't maximize until closer to the 192 hour panel - in the interim, the lower tropospheric vortex and accompanied frontal structure collocated under the core heights (true capture - hense the slow movement); there will be a period of ecstatic UVM when that happens, resulting in the column thickness dropping like a nympho prom date on the west side of the system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if it wound up that way it would have 0, NOTHING, ZILCH, NO correlation to these runs - it would be for mere coincidence at this time range, particularly when you have a synoptic polar high in eastern Ontario with clear dam nose into New England.

None of these runs are dynamically accurate, either. Granted, modeling has come a long way since 1992 - still, even 24 hour before that storm we were supposed to get nothing but rain in the Merrimack Valley where I went to college, and we wound up with 4" of slush, then another 13.5" of powder over top, and that was after a solid 4" of rain went in the gauge.

Ugh -

btw, 1992 was recently sited as an analog for the time frame in question.

I don't think its that there isn't enough cold air around...it can be marginally just cold enough and dynamically induced, but its not like the models are slam dunk snow event with -10C H85s along the Mass Pike for these events that's all. You've got the ECM with a H5 cut-off over the Carolina's with H85 freezing line going from ORH to BUF. Not exactly arctic air.

Sometimes that same sfc low position and mid level lows would result in snow down to DC/BWI area...instead they flirt with +10C H85 temps on this run.

All the comments about "not much cold air around" isn't necessarily aimed at a certain area and that's not to say it can't snow in the Merrimack Valley in December... its more saying that if we had a much better airmass around, this would be a massive hit for everyone from DC to BOS including the coastal plain with that type of mid level and low level tracks. The source region is a bit stale.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think its that there isn't enough cold air around...it can be marginally just cold enough and dynamically induced, but its not like the models are slam dunk snow event with -10C H85s along the Mass Pike for these events that's all. You've got the ECM with a H5 cut-off over the Carolina's with H85 freezing line going from ORH to BUF. Not exactly arctic air.

Sometimes that same sfc low position and mid level lows would result in snow down to DC/BWI area...instead they flirt with +10C H85 temps on this run.

I refuse to get sucked into this conversation - nice try ahahha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree.

A colder source region could most definitely be a game changer for the CP and southeast areas. it might not make a difference in the interior...as it would be the difference between 18" of powder or a foot of cement....but Dec '92 (which is a great example) rained for 80% of the storm in Boston, and in SE MA where blizzard wanrings were eventually raised in mid-storm, never really cashed in due to a very marginal BL situation. Heck, even in Dec '92 I was raining in ORH for hours in that in the beginning...cannot convince that a fresher air mass in that situation would have led to an even snowier outcome.

You miss my point Will -

you are talking about details that can't be ironed out at this time range - so the discussion is moot really, particularly when it is rooted in what these guidance's are depicting.

Nothing I said brings into question cold sourcing affecting different zones - not sure where that is coming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't give up on colder solution, particularly in the 2nd half for you guys in your part of the MA. I could definitely visualize a flash collapse of a rain snow line about mid way through, as the dynamics maximize and the BL wind in NJ goes more NNE as opposed to ENE.

Also, though the 168 panel is impressive, the dynamics don't maximize until closer to the 192 hour panel - in the interim, the lower tropospheric vortex and accompanied frontal structure collocated under the core heights (true capture - hense the slow movement); there will be a period of ecstatic UVM when that happens, resulting in the column thickness dropping like a nympho prom date on the west side of the system.

:lol: nice..im not ruling out any possibility at this point

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...