Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,584
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

A new Baby, a fresh approach


Ginx snewx

Recommended Posts

All systems are a go for an event or multiple ones in the time frame! As tip mentions above, so many waves and blocks to worry about..the 12z euro trended to a wide right with the storm on the 19th after tracking over chicago last night...should be fun to predict :axe:

I see what you are saying with it looking ready to torch afterwards. My initial thinking is that this block will likely have a longer stay/influence, perhaps lasting into the new year..but that is primarily off of the fact that they tend to last for a solid period once they form, and models tend to break them down too quickly...However, is this an exception because of what you just said in this being a bootleg type of block, downstream from the departing PV? Or do we keep seeing waves undercutting through the new year? Either way I'd guess there would likely still be some warm/torchy type days in between any waves undercutting the block post- day 10

Your guess is as good as mine whether or not the blocking repeats. It usually does, correct, but without the Pacific aid, I'm wondering if this becomes the exception to the "rule."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Do you think the fact that it formed this way, instead of the more traditional way was kind of a way to get "around" the conflicting stratospheric signals? I was definitely a bit skeptical of the west based NAO at first, but it definitely seems like it's moving up on all of the guidance.

The signals actually aren't as conflicting as they first appeared to be. The developing CW and vortex escaping to Siberia was being picked up by the modeling last week. We speculated that it was possible the west-based NAO could form with this warming rushing in behind the departing vortex but it wasn't a favored solution. It seems like the vortex and warming are both faster. It's basically a classic "displaced vortex" scenario unfolding but with a poor Pacific.

The suppressed solutions on the modeling today are very possible with shades of Mar 80' ... you get a progressive Pacific forced underneath a ridge and suddenly NC-VA are the hot spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I'm certainly not disagreeing or saying forky is wrong here..just simply playing devil's advocate and siting feb 2010 for a stale airmass/bowling ball galore pattern that produced strong low pressures...

In my post above i was stating how during last week, the gfs started keying on a canadian warming in the stratosphere, behind the vortex swinging into siberia..so that development progressed up to this point in the forecast and now does support this ridging in the west based regions (as the vortex is not sitting over the north-atlantic anymore...the cause for skepticism last week).

That's a good point and certainly makes sense to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The signals actually aren't as conflicting as they first appeared to be. The developing CW and vortex escaping to Siberia was being picked up by the modeling last week. We speculated that it was possible the west-based NAO could form with this warming rushing in behind the departing vortex but it wasn't a favored solution. It seems like the vortex and warming are both faster. It's basically a classic "displaced vortex" scenario unfolding but with a poor Pacific.

The suppressed solutions on the modeling today are very possible with shades of Mar 80' ... you get a progressive Pacific forced underneath a ridge and suddenly NC-VA are the hot spot.

Thanks for the explanation.

And yeah, I definitely fear suppression somewhat with the upcoming pattern after the initial further north wave. You have the flat rolling ridge upstream of our potent shortwaves combined with a very high height anomaly to our north. That definitely does not scream a cutter to me.

But despite that fear, I do like where we sit with the Chris storm and threats after that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems we live in a global climate era where you get things like a your whole season's snow average leveled across a 2 to 3 week time span. You get crazy droughts and heat in the warm seasons. Weird "hook storms" that have only been theorized but there you go -

I don't know - the problem with climate upheaval is there are too many counter-point arguments that have to be disproven or proven, such that by the time the truth is vetted out, 50 years have gone by and everyone's dead from the calamity of the thing. Well ... there's your answer!

Anyway, I guess the Great Snow of 1717 dumped a season's worth in 10 days. That was supposedly a stabler climate era - colder, but stable. If it can happen then, it can certainly happen now. I'm talking about the 06z GFS run I just looked at it. Jebus H Gripe!! Modulate all three of those menaces just a tick or two and you got 25, 25, and 25 for someone. It even implies at the end, a backer. heh.

So I take a gander at that 18z rollin' on in and it has a Subsume scenario - basically, that means it takes a potent southern streamer and uses it to induce a southward plunging SPV fragment, that latter captures the former, they have sex, toss a giant load on New England.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

she was a bit before my time... I moved to SNE back in the mid 1980s - she was pretty much done by then, wasn't she. I remember vaguely that she was always stuck out in the snow as a reporter, but that's about it.

And a little piece of trivia...she was from Seattle. One time in the early 70s Seattle was getting about 8 inches of snow and they were mentioning her old home town on the air.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 18z GFS kind of threads the needle to achieve the less desirable outcomes. Especially for ENY and W SNE. With that kind of primary setup, odds are some kind of warm layer gets up into at least CNE. We need yesterday's GFS setup where the primary did not gain so much latitude before filling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys should really look at the analog dates and plug them in on the Daily Weather maps archive site. Within 3 days of the analogs are multiple big snow storms. The MA to NE are in the game. I posted the animated composite gifs several days ago. Several runs today are very close. Feeling much more confident that a near KU event will unfold. The usual caveats at long term.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't wait for next week's storm to bury NYC-DCA while leaving New England smoking cirrus, maybe altostratus if you're lucky.

That would be painful. Especially if the GFS is right and SNE sees almost no snow with the Sun - Tue threats. The big coastal low on the guidance is still 8 days out. Nearly fantasy land.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That would be painful. Especially if the GFS is right and SNE sees almost no snow with the Sun - Tue threats. The big coastal low on the guidance is still 8 days out. Nearly fantasy land.

That would indeed be quite a painful experience. But not to worry, I'm willing to mail people some snow in a cardboard box just so you can remember what it looks, feels, and tastes like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...