Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,584
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

A new Baby, a fresh approach


Ginx snewx

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

i haven't had a chc to read back through everything...so maybe it's been addressed somewhere...anyone think the wavelengths are short(er than normal)?

I was thinking that same thing awhile ago - almost like we're in a transitional pattern where it's really that the L/W are harder to define while things are re-situating.

How about NCEP:

" BY THAT TIME THERE IS A DECENT LEVEL OF UNCERTAINTY IN STORM TRACK AND EXACT LOCATION OF THE RAIN/SNOW LINE BUT CURRENTLY EXPECT ANY WINTRY WEATHER TO BE CONFINED TO SOME PORTION OF AN AREA COVERING THE UPR MS VLY INTO THE GRTLKS/NORTHEAST."

Wow, they really nailed it down, a ?

haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While the ECMWF does not show snow for us at the moment, I do however like the fact that is clearly shows two storm chances for us in the future. The first one is a week from today and the second one is 10 days from now. Even though it isn't exactly showing snow.........getting it to show a storm is the first step. Let's work on the other ones in time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While the ECMWF does not show snow for us at the moment, I do however like the fact that is clearly shows two storm chances for us in the future. The first one is a week from today and the second one is 10 days from now. Even though it isn't exactly showing snow.........getting it to show a storm is the first step. Let's work on the other ones in time.

That pattern beyond those 10 days looks very active as well. I don't think any major changes have occurred from what some of us were thinking last week. If there is one thing that has changed a little bit, it is the retrograding of the vortex that temporarily goes north of AK which stops our cross-polar flow...that is something that could cause the cold air source to be more modified than earlier thought at least in the nearer term (like next week)...the vortex however is moving and appears to be a transient feature eventually retrograding into Siberia as the Aleutian Ridge rebuilds poleward after that on the ensembles.

This doesn't mean next weekend can't produce snow however. If that high gets anchored in southern Quebec with enough blocking assistance, it would likely be a pretty underrated air mass. But obviously with no huge arctic cold in the near term, you need that synoptic setup to be that much better...less wiggle room.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please move this to the analysis only thread because I'd like to see some mathematical breakdown discussion on how much it could possibly be a homefield advantage for the Pats.

Incomplete analysis (due to incomplete memory) of fairly recent Pats snowy wins:

Jan 2001, 16-13 OT over OAK. (Tuck Rule game.)

Dec 2003, 10-0 over MIA (Though the snow was only that thrown into the air by fans after Bruschi's pick-six.)

Dec 2008, 47-7 over ARI (And the Cards nearly won the SB that season.)

Oct 2009, 59-0 over TEN

Not including any such games I've missed, that's an avg score of 33-5, though an NFL game ending with that exact score has probably never occurred.

AUG still hanging tough at 30, with FZDZ. Hooray for CAD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A nice run of the euro ensembles this afternoon showed a southward shift in both storm threats next week. the 16th-17th event redevelops south of you guys, off the coast of LI, but the winds are southeast leading up to it as the primary goes into detroit..still a nice trend...the next event on the 19th also trended colder with a good event for interior northeast verbatim.. better than the euro op across the board

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That pattern beyond those 10 days looks very active as well. I don't think any major changes have occurred from what some of us were thinking last week. If there is one thing that has changed a little bit, it is the retrograding of the vortex that temporarily goes north of AK which stops our cross-polar flow...that is something that could cause the cold air source to be more modified than earlier thought at least in the nearer term (like next week)...the vortex however is moving and appears to be a transient feature eventually retrograding into Siberia as the Aleutian Ridge rebuilds poleward after that on the ensembles.

This doesn't mean next weekend can't produce snow however. If that high gets anchored in southern Quebec with enough blocking assistance, it would likely be a pretty underrated air mass. But obviously with no huge arctic cold in the near term, you need that synoptic setup to be that much better...less wiggle room.

Help me out. It is the presence of the Aleutian Ridge that allows (or helps) cross polar flow which allows for cold air to enter our region?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Strange day for departures and temps, orh reached 57 which was a +16, was +5.4 for the month before today, should be north of +6 tomorrow.

Tan looks like it really torched while the valleys were much cooler.

5 out of the first ten days at orh have featured double digit positive departures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...