vortex95 Posted December 6, 2012 Share Posted December 6, 2012 http://rogerpielkejr...ne-drought.html I think the most important thing to come away with here is this: "The long-term intense hurricane drought means that a mere "regression to the mean" will see more hurricane landfalls and considerably higher damage in the years to come. The fashionable talk these days of a "new normal" is of course utter ( ) . Just wait until we return to the "old normal" -- I know that it may be hard to believe, but both hurricane damage and climate hype are set to increase dramatically in the years to come." Want to talk about "normal"? The period from 1970 to present has been relatively quiet meteorologically for major hurricane strikes in the U.S. Yes, 2004 and 2005 were very bad, but it is isolated to those two years in a 42 year period taking the seasons as a whole (not talking about number of named storms per season here either, but that has its own share of problems over the climatic record). Now, if you look at the period 1925-1969, it was way worse, again, strictly from a meteorological standpoint. If you look at the number of major hurricane landfalls in the U.S from that period and where they hit, it is no contest to the current period (the Hurricane Re-analysis Project really shows how bad it was). There were not just a few bad seasons for major landfalls either, they were spread out over multiple years, esp. if you look at Florida. And there is New England...1938, 1944, 1954 (2), and 1960. That averages one hurricane every 4-5 years over that 22 year period. How many hurricanes have made landfall over Long Island or the New England coast since 1960?, three...Belle (1976), Gloria (1985), and Bob (1991). So when talking about "normals" you have to be very careful. I will state the disclaimer than I realize hurricanes are only one part of equation in global climate, but 1) they are an important factor in the grand scheme of things I believe because of their enormous heat extraction and dissipation both from the air and sea and heat distribution between the tropics and polar regions, and 2) individual hurricane strikes are often used as poster childs to say the wx is getting worse. They are getting worse, but in my opinion only from a sociological and economical point of view, not meteorological. We need to stick to the science of meteorology itself here if we are to properly view things in the correct perspective. The sociological shock and awe factor from individual wx events is not part of practicing good objective science. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.