Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Potential Snow 11/27 - 11/28


NEG NAO

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 473
  • Created
  • Last Reply

We're going to need this storm to trend deeper to allow for a stronger northerly flow. That would help greatly with the BL. The NAM tries to do this but it's still very borderline.

It winds up doing it 6 hours too late... the DGEX lights this baby up over SNE. Those dynamics would bring warning criteria snows. One can dream.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For reference the NAM at 18z shows a very distinct difference between the boundary layer temps along the coast and even barely inland. JFK/LGA/etc don't ever flip to snow..while areas a bit farther inland like EWR have 3-4 hours of heavy snow with better lift. Farther northwest, the thermal profile is more supportive...albeit still marginal...but areas like MMU are barely snow for the entire event.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For reference the NAM at 18z shows a very distinct difference between the boundary layer temps along the coast and even barely inland. JFK/LGA/etc don't ever flip to snow..while areas a bit farther inland like EWR have 3-4 hours of heavy snow with better lift. Farther northwest, the thermal profile is more supportive...albeit still marginal...but areas like MMU are barely snow for the entire event.

Do you think the NAM is picking up on the development of a coastal front?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's very broad and almost hard to see on the national maps. It looks like it goes off the NC coast and then to a point quite a bit south of the benchmark at 1016mb at 84 hours.

If that's the track, there will probably be almost zero qpf north of about philly. That is a terrible mean SLP track.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course a lot depends on how that mean SLP was generated...if there is a lot of uncertainty in the pressure field to the north, then we'd probably see mean qpf much further north than the mean track would indicate...but if there is less uncertainty to the north of that track, then that is no good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SREFs out on raleigh's page...they are actually slightly better than the 15z run. There's probably a few amped members in there looking at the pressure field...esp late in the run.

Yeah the SV maps don't let you compare with the 15z run...the maps I posted are in 12 hr increments. So I was looking compared to 09z.

Good to see they're a little better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cold air not the issue...we just need the storm! Looking less amped...but still enough time for a north trend

Not sure if there's enough time to get the north trend again. The change in the strength of the s/w happens inside 36 hrs. This run is flat and basically stormless

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...