Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,587
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

November Mid-Long Range Discussion


MillzPirate

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 556
  • Created
  • Last Reply

DT now sharing potential storminess around the 28th! I expect snow to be well North and west, but pattern is changing!

I sure don't see it not that any forecast at that range has any skill whatsoever in the dailies. The biggest potential for storminess in over the Pac NW during that time range as the big positive anomaly near the Bering Sea teleconnects to heavier than normal precipitation across that region.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I sure don't see it not that any forecast at that range has any skill whatsoever in the dailies. The biggest potential for storminess in over the Pac NW during that time range as the big positive anomaly near the Bering Sea teleconnects to heavier than normal precipitation across that region.

Ya, he was basing it on a Negative tilt trough on yesterday's 12 EC Ensemble model runs. Specifically this map:

00zECMWFENS500mbHeightAnomalyNA240.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ya, he was basing it on a Negative tilt trough on yesterday's 12 EC Ensemble model runs. Specifically this map:

00zECMWFENS500mbHeightAnomalyNA240.gif

That looks more like a lakes runner that might become a miller b north of us but basing such a forecast on one euro ens mean is pretty foolish. I think the big story in that time range will be in the pac nw. Somewhere around the end of the month or beginning of the new one someone there is likely to get a big slug of precip. In the east there is way more going on but then Dave likes going for the jugular.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That looks more like a lakes runner that might become a miller b north of us but basing such a forecast on one euro ens mean is pretty foolish. I think the big story in that time range will be in the pac nw. Somewhere around the end of the month or beginning of the new one someone there is likely to get a big slug of precip. In the east there is way more going on but then Dave likes going for the jugular.

Wes, how would you rate DT as a forecaster overall?

He is now quite bullish on this winter. Looking for above average snow and below normal temps.

Do you agree?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12z GFS looking interesting through 189 hrs

maybe an overrunning type thingy in the makings

At the very least, the GFS is moving toward at least something of "weather" interest in the 7-10 day period.

Does look interesting...sneaky high pressing down. Of course, it goes to crap after truncation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I started working through the snowfall data that zwyts posted. I pulled the top 15 and bottom 15 for comparison to see if anything stood out. Much of the data points towards things we already know but it's still fun to look and compare.

Here's the gridded index data:

As Wes has done an excellent job explaining already, it's clear that the AO is more important than the NAO. The short story is that if the AO isn't favorable take any modeled snow with a grain of salt.

The data also shows that we need the PNA to be + if we want big snow and if we don't have some sort of decent NAO then we need the PNA to do its part. Most of this has been pointed out multiple times over the years. Also, big -NAOs are not good for us. Too much negative nao and everything is pushed south.

One of the trends that I saw with the AO is that more often than not the snows happen when the AO is falling leading up to the event.

I pulled the H5 anom maps for the day of each group of storms.

Here's the 10+" storms:

And this is the group of 5-6" storms:

There is a noticeable difference in heights over AK between the 2 sets of data. Not sure if it's a blip or something meaningful. It seems that higher heights over AK teleconnect to smaller storms when we have a -ao/-nao combo.

I also put together animations of NH h5 anoms for the 6 days prior to the storm. Pretty cool to look at but it really doesn't show anything that we didn't already know:

10"+

5-6" storms

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks...nicely done....you can see the more pronounced split flow in the bigger storms......

Split flow / open gulf shows up even better when you run just a couple of storms in the group instead of the 15 in the animations.

I really like how the animations show consistent higher heights near greenland the entire 7 panels. Also a nice 50/50 sig shows up. It's nothing that we don't already know but it is a nice way of looking at things (and something to keep in mind when models are honking MA snow).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice work Bob. The 11/11/87 storm is such a statistical annomaly. +AO, +NAO and climo were all against it. Yet we still got 11.5".

I saw that too and had to triple check the dates to make sure I didn't have a typo. It's the proverbial needle threading I suppose. We see the ingredients on the table often in craptastic patterns but they rarely pan out. Every once in a while though....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is nice to look at to help keep 2011 paranoia at bay. Much different look over AK and Russia this year. Not saying that I think everything looks great so far because we need some more help but at the very least see consistent high heights this year over AK and Russia is a massive improvement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very nice work, Bob! What jumped out to me in the 10"+ animation is the Aleutian block is there at the beginning, but then a strong Aleutian/North Pac low develops, which serves to pump up the PNA and give us that west coast ridging as the storm gets going.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is nice to look at to help keep 2011 paranoia at bay. Much different look over AK and Russia this year. Not saying that I think everything looks great so far because we need some more help but at the very least see consistent high heights this year over AK and Russia is a massive improvement.

yeah, this year looks and "feels" nothing like last year

but the question remains: can we get the same seasonal snow/temp numbers by a different method?

if any location can do it, you know it's gunna' be the the MA! axesmiley.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the pattern is ho hum on the gfs. The pac changes a bit and spikes a really sharp h5 ridge off the ca coast but the main effect is a really strong and cold high pushes south into the intermountain west. Naturally there is ridging out in front so we're pretty boring along the ec.

No big deal really because that type of pattern is totally normal. Just not conducive for cold here.

Just speculating here but you always wonder how things evolve with that kind of ridging. Almost looks omega'ish. Split flow coming? STJ? lol

http://mag.ncep.noaa.gov/NCOMAGWEB/appcontroller?prevPage=Param&MainPage=indexℑ=&page=Param&cycle=11%2F19%2F2012+12UTC&rname=UPPER+AIR+PARMS&pname=500_vort_ht&pdesc=&model=GFS&area=NPAC&cat=MODEL+GUIDANCE&fcast=8+Day+Loop&areaDesc=North+Pacific+-+Western+US+Alaska+Western+Canada+Hawaii+North+Pacific+Ocean&prevArea=NPAC&currKey=region&returnToModel=&imageSize=M

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...