Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,587
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

November Mid-Long Range Discussion


MillzPirate

Recommended Posts

Snow? 2m temps are in the 30s it seems.

ive only looked at ncep maps.. looks a bit precarious in the city at least but n/w might be fine. timing could use a good 6 hrs of slowing or so. but it's better than having no precip i suppose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 556
  • Created
  • Last Reply

yeah looked iffy in dc even to my weenie eyes. at least its something to track in late november.

I actually sorta think the Euro is too dry/suppressed but its never the best bet to go against it. NAM/SREF seem to support at least some precip tho light rates might not do us any good even at night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

06z looks kind of meh down there when you look away from the weenie snow maps. You probably want that south a bit, even considering the garbage GFS low level depiction which is too warm this time of year. Area Just NW of DC probably would be ok.

yeah, but at 84 hrs out, this is a good place to be considering the model trend

actually, 6Z NAM is probably closer to where we ultimately want to be

http://mag.ncep.noaa...el=&imageSize=M

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given how the models performed lately who knows. I wouldn't be shocked if it did tick NW a bit...but the gfs op could still be a NW outlier.

Even so, it's pretty warm and at 90 hrs has temps above freezing from the ground to just below 850 mb with the max temp in the layer being 4.2C. Hardly a snow sounding. The nam may end up being colder but....it's pretty far out in the nam time range.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even so, it's pretty warm and at 90 hrs has temps above freezing from the ground to just below 850 mb with the max temp in the layer being 4.2C. Hardly a snow sounding. The nam may end up being colder but....it's pretty far out in the nam time range.

Yeah it was kind of mild and the 850 low track isn't the best with borderline temps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

84hrs, it is certainly slower with the evolution, but 84 hr sim/radar says we should get some precip

http://mag.ncep.noaa...el=&imageSize=M

plus, thicknesses aren't bad, though I'm sure "some met" will tell us how warm the lower levels are, and will be right based on soundings whistle.gif

http://mag.ncep.noaa...el=&imageSize=M

but this is the end of the NAM run, so I'm looking for trends and they are still positive fwiw

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...