Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

11/7 Noreaster Thread


Rib

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Dude, the NAM first called it 12z Saturday with the further off-shore track.....while all the other models had an inland track.

All models are now swinging towards the latest NAM with the more offshore solution. 18z GFS looks like 18Z NAM....12z Euro = further offshore track as well.

NAM = pwning all again. Wake up and smell the coffee. (not targeted @ you....the nam haters in general )

The NAM rocks at 84 hours out....case closed.

Uh... you're not being serious, right? The NAM, for the most part, sucks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The big one was Nov 6-7, 1953. Low path was not that different than current, execpt it continued NW into N NJ. . Phl - 9", Millville 15" Lancaster 18"Wilmington 12", Lock Haven 30".

Hey, I'm sorry I've been hibernating - essentially pulled out of the board last summer (2011). Personal and crazy stuff.

**** Apologies especially to Ray, in Elko, for not replying for so long to his gracious mail - - ***

I was in Jersey City in 1953- 17 yrs old. I do remember this snowstorm up there. Turned to rain after accumulating. Was quite a storm while it lasted. Storm pulled in warm air around NY area, but I was **jealous** to see a football game in Philly on TV that weekend, with piles of snow in the area surrounding the field.

The other thing is someone mentioned that early snow can be a kiss of death. Don't know about the Philly area, but NYC got the first really good snow the following January - 1954 - following a snow drought of sorts since 1948 or 49.

Best to all of you. Have discovered a group of mature people in the Philly thread.

Jim Herbert - W. Windsor

Link to comment
Share on other sites

did your friend just tell you to say that, or have you followed it's accuracy for years ?

..all the other models are now trending towards it.

so yeah ok, it sucks.

That is like saying the Cleveland Browns are a great football team after they win one game. Every model has a win once in a while just like a broken clock is right twice a day but just look at the verification scores...don't bring up subjective crap like some storm you "remember" or some story about one instance...there are times the JMA scored a coup also. What makes a model is consistency and being right more often on average over time, not nailing one storm. The NAM is a horrible model outside 48 hours and there is a plethora of evidence and data to support my statement. Either offer scientific evidence to back up your statement or knock it off with the NAM nonsense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...