Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

11/7 Noreaster Thread


Rib

Recommended Posts

Look what I started. Now we have to open up a banter thread.

Anyway, I just went 1-3" along I-95 and 4-8" north & west for the peeps at home. I've seen marginal set-ups like this (fall and spring nor'easters without truly cold air) both bust (a la April 1, 2011 and December 5 ish, 2009) and overperform (like October 2011) but I always lean conservative on these types until we're real close.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Right or wrong on the naming idea itself, it would be a missed opportunity for TWC if not.

I think they'll wait for a slam dunk for their first effort so that they don't lose credibility. This one seems to have too much bust potential (i.e. possibly too warm in the northeast megalopolis or too little geographic snowfall coverage area) for them to risk their already controversial experiment on. A good test though for their new thingy. Wish we knew more about their naming criteria.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they'll wait for a slam dunk for their first effort so that they don't lose credibility. This one seems to have too much bust potential (i.e. possibly too warm in the northeast megalopolis or too little geographic snowfall coverage area) for them to risk their already controversial experiment on. A good test though for their new thingy. Wish we knew more about their naming criteria.

To be fair I think they said that they could go back after the storm and give it a name. Not that it really matters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FWIW, in some of the big snowstorms we've had in our region the NAM was always a bit out sea around this time frame. The model seems to misplace the low etc imo. I think it's right where we want it. 18z is colder fwiw,

Can mets chime in to why the models trended way colder in the last 24 hrs? Something to do with the backside energy? 18z NAM is trying to hook it back on shore, not like it matters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

im curious on this. If this snowstorm occurs over the i95 corridor. The euro showed 1-2 inch snowfall rates. Would the criteria be met for a blizzard warning for the region? We have a high wind watch for gust to 50-55mph, wind is their, heavy snow for atleast 3 hours, if we get those deform bands the euro showed thats potentially doable. With those two combined you would have reduced visibility under .25 mile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

im curious on this. If this snowstorm occurs over the i95 corridor. The euro showed 1-2 inch snowfall rates. Would the criteria be met for a blizzard warning for the region? We have a high wind watch for gust to 50-55mph, wind is their, heavy snow for atleast 3 hours, if we get those deform bands the euro showed thats potentially doable. With those two combined you would have reduced visibility under .25 mile.

It would technically fit the bill for a blizzard by the true sense of the word, just wouldnt be our normal type of blizzard with high snowfall amounts we are kinda used to. But this would fit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...