Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,586
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    23Yankee
    Newest Member
    23Yankee
    Joined

12/20-12/21 Moderate/Intense Clipper Event?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I can think of 3 significant December snows for your area without even having to think about it. 12/11/00, 12/8/05, 12/15/07. :snowman:

Shh...this is a no reality zone...don't ruin it!

Although, since you've already interjected some, I'll interject a little more. We are -10F for the month. There is a considerable snowpack across most of the midwest. Even if this does end up being a "slopfest," we've all got at least some snow on the ground and it's not going away for Christmas. That's better than the last few years which have had pretty big Decembers and yet Christmas Day has had bare ground. Let's enjoy what we've got.:snowman:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's been frustrating for quite a few in the Great Lakes. Luckily we've had the benefit of lake effect snow here in Cleveland, but we're still waiting on our first system snow of the year. This one's just not going to cut it for points this far east. What percentage of your annual snow is lake effect around there? The way it's going already, I'm thinking this year might end up being 75% LES, 25% system.

Our average snowfall here each year is about 100 inches...of that, I'm guessing 50 to 60 inches is from lake effect. So far, we've gotten about 13 inches of snow, and I think only about 3 of those inches is from "systems". The other 10 inches are from two lake effect events. I'm so glad for the lake (even though many of our lake effect "potentials" this year have been busts as well) At least we have a solid snowpack!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shh...this is a no reality zone...don't ruin it!

Although, since you've already interjected some, I'll interject a little more. We are -10F for the month. There is a considerable snowpack across most of the midwest. Even if this does end up being a "slopfest," we've all got at least some snow on the ground and it's not going away for Christmas. That's better than the last few years which have had pretty big Decembers and yet Christmas Day has had bare ground. Let's enjoy what we've got.:snowman:

QFT.

We have had some great winters the past few years in our area and this one is starting out pretty well.I just don't get the pessimism of some...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Toledo still has a solid snowcover. Noticeably less than Detroit, but their 0 snowdepth on the climate summary is obviously bogus. DTW had 6.3" with the 12/12 storm and has 5" on the ground still. Toledo had 4.0" with the 12/12 storm, no way they have 1" or less on the ground.

http://www.trafficla.../TOL/index.html

How are you doing with depth? If I recall you were in that intense lake band a week+ back, saw abandoned cars and stuff in CLE?

That virtually all melted last Friday and Saturday. The additional snow on Monday was accompanied with several days of 40 mph winds which scoured the landscape. There's a dusting of snow here and there, with the occasional 2" spot. But for the most part the grass is showing 75%

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MSP:

12z...

ECMWF: 0.50"

GFS: 0.50"

NAM: 0.47"

GGEM: 0.75-1.00"

LSE:

12z...

ECMWF: 0.41"

GFS: 0.43"

NAM: 0.37"

GGEM: About 0.75"

MKE:

12z...

ECMWF: 0.36"

GFS: 0.41"

NAM: 0.28"

GGEM: 0.50-0.75"

ORD:

12z...

ECMWF: 0.38"

GFS: 0.43"

NAM: 0.26"

GGEM: 0.25-0.50"

LAF:

12z...

ECMWF: 0.16"

GFS: 0.21"

NAM: 0.27"

GGEM: 0.10-0.25"

CMH:

12z...

ECMWF: 0.10"

GFS: 0.15"

NAM: 0.03"

GGEM: Nearly 0.25"

DTW:

12z...

ECMWF: 0.13"

GFS: 0.29"

NAM: 0.04"

GGEM: About 0.25"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You make a few interesting comments worth replying too. First, I certainly can't replace your 45 years of experience, but I always warn against analog forecasting which I have seen some commenters make here. Such analogs as "never snows hard in Decemember" or "WAA is ALWAYS overdone". Every storm is different and must be analyzed as such. I honestly haven't looked too hard down that way, but one thing to always consider with intense systems with low static stability is intensity driven snow which can overcome warm pockets at the surface as the wet snow flakes can easily rapidly accumulate and turn everything into a big mess. Not saying that will happen, but it is never a good idea to forecast with analogs only as it will set one up for some very big busts. Think Halloween 1991 storm. 30 inches of snow should never fall in October, right? Of course can't compare that storm to this and every storm should be analyzed without making broad assumptions based off past storms. Either way, I don't blame anyone here for being pessimistic.

Around here, being pessimistic about snow systems...well, let's use the term "guardedly optimistic". is kind of the way some of us are. .. Anyway, I am not in the same class as 90% of the people here as far as meteorology goes, what I know probably wouldn't fill a thimble. That being said, since I have lived here my entire life, and have paid attention to the weather since grade school, I understand, on some level, the climo around here. You make a good point, every storm is different, and going on analogs is not a good way to forecast. On one hand I know what the weather does around here, and on the other, I know to expect the unexpected. It's happened before. December of 2007, we got 11 inches of snow, when we were forecast for less than that. Several times in my youth, I remember over-performing storms that weren't expected. At the same time, BIG storms were forecast, only to bust, and bust huge.....

To reference what was mentioned earlier, there is going to be plenty of nowcasting come tomorrow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's the Marquette run from last night's 00z. So much has changed since then it's almost irrelevant now. Still interesting. Wish the IWX would update more regularly, but it's not maintained like our regular models are.

Ya was my first time seeing that run, looked quite interesting, curious to see what the next run will show.

18z NAM looks a tad wetter here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...