Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,793
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    manaja
    Newest Member
    manaja
    Joined

Election week coastal storm threat


Midlo Snow Maker

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

"Slushy coating on grassy surfaces" sounds too generous if anything from DC to Baltimore.

Dynamic cooling needs good precip rates to work. If the precip rates EURO is showing over the DC-BAL area verify, the moon angle will be a problem!!

This is a cold air mass. Don't think you need the super band at this pt but still want some sort of rates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still a wicked tight gradient, but when you have heavy precip 50 miles away it doesn't take much of a shift between cycles to get you into the good stuff. I figured we'd see this. These mega sharp cutoffs often diffuse out.

Yea it's hard to believe a low that close isn't throwing precip further west

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still a wicked tight gradient, but when you have heavy precip 50 miles away it doesn't take much of a shift between cycles to get you into the good stuff. I figured we'd see this. These mega sharp cutoffs often diffuse out.

That is typical with nam and will spread out as we start to see actual precip shield nw of it. I think if Gfs has that track precip will be more widespread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

East side of Baltimore MTN about .6-.7" QPF, though with a low track like that I'd say the precip would definitely be more for both Baltimore and DC back to the BR. There would also definitely be some banding through our area.

Baltimore would start as snow but warms up aloft by 09Z and would probably be rain or sleet by 09Z if the model sounding at right. sfc temp would probably be around 34 unless it really came down hard in banding providing the model is correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Baltimore would start as snow but warms up aloft by 09Z and would probably be rain or sleet by 09Z if the model sounding at right. sfc temp would probably be around 34 unless it really came down hard in banding providing the model is correct.

True Wes, 4km WRF gives Baltimore 1.3" of QPF, most likely based on its convective tendencies, but regardless it deforms central MD which makes sense with a low track like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hearing rumors of feedback issues with the dual low structure being shown on the NAM causing a premature jump west... can anyone confirm?

The jump west certainly looks strange so I wouldn't be surprised but am not going to take time really looking at it with the election going on. Having the low almost west of the upper low is odd looking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chuck the 0z NAM:

.SYSTEM AFFECTING THE EAST COAST WED-THU...

...INITIAL MS VALLEY ENERGY INTERACTING WITH THIS SYSTEM...

BASED ON THE NAM BOUNDARY LAYER WIND ANALYSIS... THE MODEL PLACES

THE SFC LOW OVER THE WRN ATLC ABOUT 60 NM TO THE W OF THE OBSERVED

POSN. THE PMSL STAMP IN THE NAM IS ABOUT 35 NM TO THE W OF THE

OBS LOW POSN. ALSO OF NOTE THE NAM HAS ANALYZED 850 MB TEMPS AT

IAD/WAL ABOUT 2 C COLDER THAN SEEN IN RAOB REPORTS AND NAM 500 MB

HGTS AT WAL/MHX ARE ABOUT 2 DM LOWER THAN RAOB VALUES.

THE NAM AND FARTHER SWD 12Z CANADIAN GLBL BRING THE SFC LOW

FARTHEST WWD NEAR THE NRN MID ATLC COAST... WITH MID LVL CLOSED

LOWS THAT ARE NEARLY IDENTICAL IN DEPTH/POSN FROM WED NIGHT INTO

THU. FROM LATE THU ONWARD THE NAM IS GENERALLY ON THE SWRN FRINGE

OF GUIDANCE WITH THE SFC LOW AND CORE OF MID LVL ENERGY.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hearing rumors of feedback issues with the dual low structure being shown on the NAM causing a premature jump west... can anyone confirm?

The low sorta pirouettes under the UL low as the UL system closes off and the whole thing becomes vertically stacked...then gets kicked before it can cutoff and hang around. That's not unheard of, but the timing and placement of that sort of event is rarely handled well, much less perfectly. Obviously for us, and NE MD, that'd be a crucial element of the NAM's forecast. Tiny slips in that forecast will make a world of difference.

The GFS's evolution as the system becomes vertically stacked is probably a safer bet, assuming one were going to simply place a bet based on odds rather than confidence rooted in experience and/or knowledge. FWIW, I'd have to do go the whole odds route....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...