Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,793
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    manaja
    Newest Member
    manaja
    Joined

Election week coastal storm threat


Midlo Snow Maker

Recommended Posts

That was the beginning of the great Snow Hole of '10-11.. I just remember that Christmas... there was so much virga on the radar I am pretty sure I hallucinated snow flakes in my back yard for a few hours... Virginia Beach got nailed and then Phi to Boston got nailed... and we were in the screw zone

I came back from CT as I didn't want to get stuck there and figured we'd at least get a few inches. Got flurries most of the day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

The wounds from that storm are still healing for many of us, so tight gradients on late-bombing storms have us gun shy.

I left my brother's house in South Jersey at around noon or so that day with the first flakes flying. I drove home with flakes in the air nearly all the way to Baltimore...then *poof*.

I knowingly drove away from a blizzard that gave my brother over a foot of snow. Pain...

(Sorry for the tangent)

Ya here is the EURO for that storm. Talk about a kick in the nuts.

post-959-0-21953900-1352228416_thumb.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

time to start watching radars and sat pics too

http://beta.intellic...ue&animate=true

http://www.ssd.noaa....na-wv-loop.html

I think we can see our issue on that water vapor loop.....that short wave in the mid west has got to be perfect

that short wave has acted to kick the initial development of the low further east and that is our problem. If that wasnt there this would bomb much closer in and we wouldnt need this to pull back in from the east.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CWG:

For the D.C. area, we’d give the following odds for snow:

* 40 percent chance of no snow; just light rain showers, if anything

* 20 percent chance of snowflakes mixing in with rain, but no accumulation

* 20 percent chance of a slushy coating of snow, mainly on grassy areas

* 15 percent chance of a coating to 1” of wet snow, mainly on grassy areas

* 5 percent chance of 1-4” of wet snow

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/capital-weather-gang/post/first-snowflakes-of-the-season-possible-in-washington-dc-wednesday/2012/11/06/4a5f6ae8-2847-11e2-bab2-eda299503684_blog.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cool shot, thanks. Question, so basically we need the vort and that thing diving down from the mid-west to phase and deepen south enough, correct?

I asked the same question yesterday evening and CoastalWx had a really good answer:

That's a tough question. I think for the DC area, you probably want to cheer on a stronger initial s/w. The reason is because it's possible the energy in the Midwest will remain separate enough to prevent phasing and bring the low further west. Now some of this energy is in Canada and it's possible that the energy may dive into the backside trough enough to carve it out further and pull the low further NW...but I think the easier thing to do atmospherically, is to have the initial srn s/w stronger.

The energy as progged today is coming around the backside stronger and cutting off more than yesterday. The result is that the backside s/w sort of gives the initial s/w the boot east.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You just have to cheer on nowcasting really.

Pretty much. It all comes down to the 850 low getting its act together as quickly as possible. We really need it to get cranking and having a nice shield develop on the nw side. Obviously some banding will be required to get anything to stick.

If I had to guess the deform band will be a little more robust than what the nam is showing but will it be enough? I would hedge on the probably not side of the equation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This pretty much sums up how the 18z nam thinks it's going to go down tomorrow:

http://mag.ncep.noaa.gov/NCOMAGWEB/appcontroller?prevPage=Param&MainPage=indexℑ=&page=Param&cycle=11%2F06%2F2012+18UTC&rname=SFC-LAYER+PARMS&pname=sim_radar&pdesc=&model=NAM&area=NAMER&cat=MODEL+GUIDANCE&fcast=2+Day+Loop&areaDesc=North+America+-+US+Canada+and+northern+Mexico&prevArea=NAMER&currKey=model&returnToModel=&imageSize=M

Northern NJ seems to get the enhanced precip on the NW side.

Again, we really need to collectively wish that the 850 get fired up early and rotates in quicker than what the nam is showing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This pretty much sums up how the 18z nam thinks it's going to go down tomorrow:

http://mag.ncep.noaa...el=&imageSize=M

Northern NJ seems to get the enhanced precip on the NW side.

Again, we really need to collectively wish that the 850 get fired up early and rotates in quicker than what the nam is showing.

Comparing the first frame of that loop and the current radar, it looks as if the precip field depicted (SC/ GA border) is much further south than the current radar (NC). I am not sure if that means the model is projecting a flare up south of the current precip field or if it is just using data from hours earlier. I would assume that the first frame of the Simulated Radar would be almost identical to the current radar at the time of the model run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This pretty much sums up how the 18z nam thinks it's going to go down tomorrow:

http://mag.ncep.noaa...el=&imageSize=M

Northern NJ seems to get the enhanced precip on the NW side.

Again, we really need to collectively wish that the 850 get fired up early and rotates in quicker than what the nam is showing.

Wow, eastern PA get's absolutely pounded. snowing3.gif Gonna be interesting to watch that dry slot feature which moves into New Jersey, that could definitely be a big factor in QPF totals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...