Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,587
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

Election week coastal storm threat


Midlo Snow Maker

Recommended Posts

Not true, Nam loses to the gfs and the sref ens mean qpf for .25 and .50 thresholds at 36 hrs and to the euro and gfs at 48 hrs. It even loses at 24 hrs.

http://www.hpc.ncep..../m3_36h_nec.gif

http://www.hpc.ncep..../m3_48h_nec.gif

http://www.hpc.ncep..../m3_24h_nec.gif

That just seems like a nice way of saying that the NAM sucks, Wes.

:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

That just seems like a nice way of saying that the NAM sucks, Wes.

Not always, it it has a good surface low position in winter it will have the better temp profiles. The trouble is making generalizations about models. The NAM is also better at getting a feel for lakes effect snows. ost models have strengths and weaknesses. Plus even though the other models score better for QPF, the scores are not so much higher that the nam has no value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meh. If the gfs/nam was in, I'd feel good. I can't get overly excited about the ggem

Normally I'm with you on that. For the most part I don't even look at anything other than gfs/euro/nam/sref. The only takeaway here is that it shows how close it is. And we know what "can" happen with systems like this. They can surprise once in a while. But it's easy to be pessimistic given the last couple winters and unfortunately a pessimistic forecast has the highest chance at being right. Not out of the game though. That's good enough to stay interested.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...