Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,583
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

Election week coastal storm threat


Midlo Snow Maker

Recommended Posts

This moral argument was put to bed years ago. Please don't perpetuate it. Any enthusiast that is 100% unwavering for imby snow is totally acceptable. There is zero reason to rationalize the other way. We are rooting for snow period. Nothing else matters at all and no criticism is necessary.

Agreed...As we all know, our desires for any particular outcome have zero affect on the outcome. In the end, it is not up to us. Rooting for a particular weather outcome will have zero effect on anyone suffering. Donating to the red cross might help those who are suffering. Just my .02

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

The next set of runs should remove most of or all of the doubt and although anything can happen, it seems the trend is for the storm to be too far east to affect us. But most of the pessimism has come about because of the latest 18z GFS run. Is that off hour run as reliable as the 0z and 12z runs statistically? The powers that be didn't order better sampling of this storm like they did with Sandy, did they?

0z could certainly come back west. After the 12z GFS the "trend" has been undeniably not a great one if you want storminess around here. That word gets thrown around too easily though... could just be a blip. The fact is we're generally not that good at storms where we need all the pieces for it to work. If you're just looking for some rain then you can go without a few I suppose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was attacking the CWG blogger for writing that maybe it's a good thing that this might miss the region.

Ji is absolutely right. I agree with him. I'm still upset with Wes for not saying that a solid pasting was the most likely scenario. Worst blog post of the young winter season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm glad you brought this up. It's the part of the puzzle that I dont fully understand when looking at h5 maps. I kinda liked the 12z gfs because it was pulling the backside energy into a closed contour. I was hoping 18z would take it a step further but it went the other way.

You think there is still a chance at better timing and interaction? I was writing it off but I'm far from the person to make that type of call.

That's a tough question. I think for the DC area, you probably want to cheer on a stronger initial s/w. The reason is because it's possible the energy in the Midwest will remain separate enough to prevent phasing and bring the low further west. Now some of this energy is in Canada and it's possible that the energy may dive into the backside trough enough to carve it out further and pull the low further NW...but I think the easier thing to do atmospherically, is to have the initial srn s/w stronger.

The energy as progged today is coming around the backside stronger and cutting off more than yesterday. The result is that the backside s/w sort of gives the initial s/w the boot east.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a tough question. I think for the DC area, you probably want to cheer on a stronger initial s/w. The reason is because it's possible the energy in the Midwest will remain separate enough to prevent phasing and bring the low further west. Now some of this energy is in Canada and it's possible that the energy may dive into the backside trough enough to carve it out further and pull the low further NW...but I think the easier thing to do atmospherically, is to have the initial srn s/w stronger.

The energy as progged today is coming around the backside stronger and cutting off more than yesterday. The result is that the backside s/w sort of gives the initial s/w the boot east.

Makes complete sense. Thank you. We're awful close to the point of no return so I hope something goes our way with 0z guidance. I'll go ahead and jump on the stronger lead shortwave bandwagon right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ehh one thing showing up on all the guidance now is that the trough is becoming less sharp due to the second shortwave diving in the backside. Instead of it all going extremely negative and pulling the storm in tight its a broad cut off low that is more strung out. Not good at all for what we need here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...