Ian Posted November 4, 2012 Share Posted November 4, 2012 Weenies looking at 18z models that show the storm too far SE 18z throw it out .. well unless it's better than 12z b Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amped Posted November 4, 2012 Share Posted November 4, 2012 It had 925mb temps below 32 in a narrow area of strong vvs. Like Ian said, a death man would probably dynamically force a 33-34F snow for even lowest elevations if it happened. Of course this all has to be timed right and that will depend on storm location. http://www.theweatherprediction.com/habyhints/220/ Jeff haby has a page on this. Basically the latent heat of melting or freezing stablize the temp near 32. Temps may initially be in the low 40s but there is a good Evaporational/Sublimational cooling setup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EasternUSWX Posted November 4, 2012 Share Posted November 4, 2012 18z throw it out .. well unless it's better than 12z b Exactly we always joke about 18Z. I mean who uses 18Z to make a forecast anyways. Never seen in NWS discussion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted November 4, 2012 Share Posted November 4, 2012 Exactly we always joke about 18Z. I mean who uses 18Z to make a forecast anyways. Never seen in NWS discussion. If someone has stats at the ready, prepare for them to be thrown at you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EasternUSWX Posted November 4, 2012 Share Posted November 4, 2012 If someone has stats at the ready, prepare for them to be thrown at you. I'll be ready to duck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted November 4, 2012 Share Posted November 4, 2012 one thing for sure.. if i saw november 87 coming together i wouldnt believe it would happen. http://www.meteo.psu.edu/~fxg1/NARR/1987/us1111.php Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MillzPirate Posted November 4, 2012 Share Posted November 4, 2012 one thing for sure.. if i saw november 87 coming together i wouldnt believe it would happen. http://www.meteo.psu.edu/~fxg1/NARR/1987/us1111.php Looked very marginal as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thunderman Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 Exactly we always joke about 18Z. I mean who uses 18Z to make a forecast anyways. Never seen in NWS discussion. Give it a rest dude. If 18z showed Jan 96 repeat then you would be all over it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heisy Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 Statistically 12z had no advantage in forecasting over the 18z etc for 00z.6z. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brad1551 Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 Who wouldn't be all over the 96 setup on the 18z. You just don't forecast off of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EasternUSWX Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 Give it a rest dude. If 18z showed Jan 96 repeat then you would be all over it. Ya right. lol. I don't base a forecast off of one run. It would be nice to look at but, believable no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 lets minimize general banter.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravensrule Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 lets minimize general banter.. I have a feeling there will be alot of 5 posting this season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usedtobe Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 I'm leaning more toward us getting at least some snow despite the nagging climo issue. I'm leaning the opposite though the one way it could happen would be if the euro from today was perfect. At least the 18Z shifted west some but it did that yesterday too. I think we see precipitation as the 18Z gfs now has some and the euro ens mean hits us pretty well but I'd like to have a better idea of the sfc temps on the euro then you get from the underground site before getting stoked about seeing snow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 I'm leaning the opposite though the one way it could happen would be if the euro from today was perfect. At least the 18Z shifted west some but it did that yesterday too. I think we see precipitation as the 18Z gfs now has some and the euro ens mean hits us pretty well but I'd like to have a better idea of the sfc temps on the euro then you get from the underground site before getting stoked about seeing snow. The 18z gfs snow algorithms spit out accumulation around here tho I'm a little skeptical of that given rates plus low level temps. But maybe I should fix my lean if you lean the other way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avdave Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 Justin Berks thoughts on the storm Have fun weenies Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usedtobe Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 The 18z gfs snow algorithms spit out accumulation around here tho I'm a little skeptical of that given rates plus low level temps. But maybe I should fix my lean if you lean the other way. I looked at the sounding for the GFS but they would change if there was heavier precip. If the euro is right, there is a chance but there is still plenty that can go wrong. The 15Z Sref members that had heavy precip in dc had no snow, in fact no members had snow at dca or bwi. I hope the euro holds serve again tonight as I'll write something tomorrow about the threat as even though I view the probability of snow, especially accumulating snow as low, it's not non-existent. Heck, that's why I'm looking at teh models this evening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhineasC Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 Justin Berks thoughts on the storm Have fun weenies Seems like a decidedly un-weenie call. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravensrule Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 Justin Berks thoughts on the storm Have fun weenies Time to get the bread, milk and toilet paper if he is only calling for that. That basically guarantees we get at least a few inches. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Chill Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 But maybe I should fix my lean if you lean the other way. Nah, hold serve. It's better to have one of you right than a chance at both being wrong. Unless you both are calling for snow. Then it's a better in the risk/reward dept. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 http://www.theweathe.../habyhints/220/ Jeff haby has a page on this. Basically the latent heat of melting or freezing stablize the temp near 32. Temps may initially be in the low 40s but there is a good Evaporational/Sublimational cooling setup. Melting is something not many talk about, but it is a big reason why marginal setups love to hang near 32-32.5F Maybe if the euro holds serve into tomorrow, we can start to hit the details harder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 Seems like a decidedly un-weenie call. It's not bad.. sort of what you'd expect from the "best" solution when factoring in climo + a little luck. Not sure why he's making a call at this pt tho.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravensrule Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 It's not bad.. sort of what you'd expect from the "best" solution when factoring in climo + a little luck. Not sure why he's making a call at this pt tho.... Same reason DT did this morning already, ATTENTION. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avdave Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 It's not bad.. sort of what you'd expect from the "best" solution when factoring in climo + a little luck. Not sure why he's making a call at this pt tho.... Pretty much my thought as well. some of these guys like to make it a competition so they can fluff their feather if they are actually right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usedtobe Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 It's not bad.. sort of what you'd expect from the "best" solution when factoring in climo + a little luck. Not sure why he's making a call at this pt tho.... I thought the same thing about the forecast but also don't think you make any call this early except to say there is a chance of precipitation in the long range look. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ellinwood Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 It's not bad.. sort of what you'd expect from the "best" solution when factoring in climo + a little luck. Not sure why he's making a call at this pt tho.... I know he says it's his "first call," but is it really a call if there's no actual snowfall ranges (aside from his "close to one inch")? Looks more like a "general idea of how he expects precip types to break down" than a call. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 Nah, hold serve. It's better to have one of you right than a chance at both being wrong. Unless you both are calling for snow. Then it's a better in the risk/reward dept. Well I did say "some" which around me could be non-accumulating of course. But for whatever reason I'm not ready to close the door on accumulation even imby. It's a solidly cold preceding air mass -- perhaps laying the groundwork for a surprise. Even the Euro ens mean has been giving us accum outside elevation.. tho 12z trended downward and is much lighter than the op. Euro op is certainly a solution I would not bet on until I see it a few more times and with support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravensrule Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 Allan going for broke: @RaleighWx: Va into new England, although NYC/Phill/Boston spared big accumulations. 4-8 inches for DC Wed night. GFS shows snow in New England. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 I know he says it's his "first call," but is it really a call if there's no actual snowfall ranges (aside from his "close to one inch")? Looks more like a "general idea of how he expects precip types to break down" than a call. Yeah, that's true. I mean just interpreting the models I'd go with something like that to start as an idea. Though it could also be completely wrong if things don't trend west a bit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ellinwood Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 Allan going for broke: @RaleighWx: Va into new England, although NYC/Phill/Boston spared big accumulations. 4-8 inches for DC Wed night. GFS shows snow in New England. ...that's a continuation of his previous tweet: @RaleighWx Nor'easter to bring wind, strong winds, more beach erosion to Northeast Wednesday-Friday. Euro shows band of 4-8 inches from central/eastern He's just reading off what the Euro says... not making a forecast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.