Mallow Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 GFS is west. Not to the Euro yet, but a pretty big step in the right direction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EasternUSWX Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 I am confident Central PA is going to get some good snows. GFS sucks and it trending west finally, EURO well we all know the EURO (HUGE), JMA was big, and the RGEM which is the first 48 hrs of GGEM is way west and looks to be almost like euro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djr5001 Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 Yeah, the station is about 6-7 miles west of York. They get some epic radiational cooling nights out there. Yea if you watch the hourly obs there (THV) on calm clear evenings you can see temperatures drop nearly 10 degrees or more in an hour right after sunset during the wintertime due to its location Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eskimo Joe Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 I am confident Central PA is going to get some good snows. GFS sucks and it trending west finally, EURO well we all know the EURO (HUGE), JMA was big, and the RGEM which is the first 48 hrs of GGEM is way west and looks to be almost like euro. On this we agree, but I feel you need to add this caveat: Good snows for November. I really have a hard time seeing anyone getting over 7" of snow, given the marginal setup. Call me overly cautious, but I'd rather bust too low then too high. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EasternUSWX Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 On this we agree, but I feel you need to add this caveat: Good snows for November. I really have a hard time seeing anyone getting over 7" of snow, given the marginal setup. Call me overly cautious, but I'd rather bust too low then too high. I consider 3" good snow for this time of year yes lol. But I can see some places 6-9" probably somewhere between Gettysburg and Poconos. Though most widespread will be 3-6" But hey that is like 20-40% of last winters total so ya. haha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mallow Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 On this we agree, but I feel you need to add this caveat: Good snows for November. I really have a hard time seeing anyone getting over 7" of snow, given the marginal setup. Call me overly cautious, but I'd rather bust too low then too high. Agreed (except of course for favored, elevated areas). But I'll take a good 3" snow in early November. Puts me that much closer to my 88.5". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EasternUSWX Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 Agreed (except of course for favored, elevated areas). But I'll take a good 3" snow in early November. Puts me that much closer to my 88.5". Mallow didn't you used to live out in Seattle? When did you move to State college? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djr5001 Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 ok fixed enough... lets try this again While some of the models have been showing snowfall potential for eastern PA with the upcoming midweek storm, I took a look at snowfall data for the month of November in Harrisburg for what we have on record. I considered 3” to be a cut off for looking at significant November snow. There have been 19 out of 123 Novembers (124 if counting 2012) with snowfall record that have had a monthly total of 3” or more. 1995 was the last time we saw significant snow in November. In fact, only twice in the last 25 years (not counting 2012 so far) that Harrisburg has recorded more than 2" of snow in November (1995 and 1987). Here are the top years with 3" or more in November at MDT: 15.4" 1953 10.2" 1938 9.7" 1987 9.7" 1967 8.8" 1971 8.4" 1908 8.1" 1995 7.8" 1892 7.2" 1898 5.9" 1972 4.6" 1955 4.5" 1962 4.0" 1980 4.0" 1978 3.7" 1961 3.0" 1968 3.0" 1952 3.0" 1911 3.0" 1910 I then looked at the monthly reports for each of those years and determined that there have been 22 days in which daily snowfall totals have equaled or exceeded 3”. If you add the 5.5” from October 29, 2011 that means we have had 23 days in the last 123-124 years where Harrisburg has seen 3” or more of snowfall in a day prior to December 1st. Here are the dates with accumulations of 3" or more: 11/3/1962 4.0" 11/6/1953 6.5" 11/7/1953 8.9" 11/9/1892 4.8" 11/10/1987 4.3" 11/11/1987 4.8" 11/12/1968 3.0" 11/14/1908 7.6" 11/15/1911 3.0" 11/17/1967 3.1" 11/17/1980 4.0" 11/19/1955 4.6" 11/20/1961 3.4" 11/24/1938 6.8" 11/24/1971 6.0" 11/25/1938 3.4" 11/27/1978 4.0" 11/28/1892 3.0" 11/29/1995 3.1" 11/30/1972 5.5" 11/30/1967 6.4" 11/30/1898 3.5" This storm could make it the 4th earliest snowfall of 3" or more on record with earliest coming last year. Back to back years with early season snowfall around here is pretty significant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mallow Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 Mallow didn't you used to live out in Seattle? When did you move to State college? I lived in Portland most of my life. Lived in Seattle from 2005-2009 while attending the UW. Am now doing grad school at Penn State, and have been since Aug 2011. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sauss06 Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 ok fixed enough... lets try this again While some of the models have been showing snowfall potential for eastern PA with the upcoming midweek storm, I took a look at snowfall data for the month of November in Harrisburg for what we have on record. I considered 3” to be a cut off for looking at significant November snow. There have been 19 out of 123 Novembers (124 if counting 2012) with snowfall record that have had a monthly total of 3” or more. 1995 was the last time we saw significant snow in November. In fact, only twice in the last 25 years (not counting 2012 so far) that Harrisburg has recorded more than 2" of snow in November (1995 and 1987). Here are the top years with 3" or more in November at MDT: 15.4" 1953 10.2" 1938 9.7" 1987 9.7" 1967 8.8" 1971 8.4" 1908 8.1" 1995 7.8" 1892 7.2" 1898 5.9" 1972 4.6" 1955 4.5" 1962 4.0" 1980 4.0" 1978 3.7" 1961 3.0" 1968 3.0" 1952 3.0" 1911 3.0" 1910 I then looked at the monthly reports for each of those years and determined that there have been 22 days in which daily snowfall totals have equaled or exceeded 3”. If you add the 5.5” from October 29, 2011 that means we have had 23 days in the last 123-124 years where Harrisburg has seen 3” or more of snowfall in a day prior to December 1st. Here are the dates with accumulations of 3" or more: 11/3/1962 4.0" 11/6/1953 6.5" 11/7/1953 8.9" 11/9/1892 4.8" 11/10/1987 4.3" 11/11/1987 4.8" 11/12/1968 3.0" 11/14/1908 7.6" 11/15/1911 3.0" 11/17/1967 3.1" 11/17/1980 4.0" 11/19/1955 4.6" 11/20/1961 3.4" 11/24/1938 6.8" 11/24/1971 6.0" 11/25/1938 3.4" 11/27/1978 4.0" 11/28/1892 3.0" 11/29/1995 3.1" 11/30/1972 5.5" 11/30/1967 6.4" 11/30/1898 3.5" This storm could make it the 4th earliest snowfall of 3" or more on record with earliest coming last year. Back to back years with early season snowfall around here is pretty significant. great info, thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eskimo Joe Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 ok fixed enough... lets try this again While some of the models have been showing snowfall potential for eastern PA with the upcoming midweek storm, I took a look at snowfall data for the month of November in Harrisburg for what we have on record. I considered 3” to be a cut off for looking at significant November snow. There have been 19 out of 123 Novembers (124 if counting 2012) with snowfall record that have had a monthly total of 3” or more. 1995 was the last time we saw significant snow in November. In fact, only twice in the last 25 years (not counting 2012 so far) that Harrisburg has recorded more than 2" of snow in November (1995 and 1987). Here are the top years with 3" or more in November at MDT: 15.4" 1953 10.2" 1938 9.7" 1987 9.7" 1967 8.8" 1971 8.4" 1908 8.1" 1995 7.8" 1892 7.2" 1898 5.9" 1972 4.6" 1955 4.5" 1962 4.0" 1980 4.0" 1978 3.7" 1961 3.0" 1968 3.0" 1952 3.0" 1911 3.0" 1910 I then looked at the monthly reports for each of those years and determined that there have been 22 days in which daily snowfall totals have equaled or exceeded 3”. If you add the 5.5” from October 29, 2011 that means we have had 23 days in the last 123-124 years where Harrisburg has seen 3” or more of snowfall in a day prior to December 1st. Here are the dates with accumulations of 3" or more: 11/3/1962 4.0" 11/6/1953 6.5" 11/7/1953 8.9" 11/9/1892 4.8" 11/10/1987 4.3" 11/11/1987 4.8" 11/12/1968 3.0" 11/14/1908 7.6" 11/15/1911 3.0" 11/17/1967 3.1" 11/17/1980 4.0" 11/19/1955 4.6" 11/20/1961 3.4" 11/24/1938 6.8" 11/24/1971 6.0" 11/25/1938 3.4" 11/27/1978 4.0" 11/28/1892 3.0" 11/29/1995 3.1" 11/30/1972 5.5" 11/30/1967 6.4" 11/30/1898 3.5" This storm could make it the 4th earliest snowfall of 3" or more on record with earliest coming last year. Back to back years with early season snowfall around here is pretty significant. Thanks for the data; I ran the average and came to 6.5". So if someone felt coerced to give an early number, 3" - 6" would seem reasonable, but mention that non-paved surfaces would see the most accumulations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EasternUSWX Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 I lived in Portland most of my life. Lived in Seattle from 2005-2009 while attending the UW. Am now doing grad school at Penn State, and have been since Aug 2011. Very cool, I thought I remember seeing your location being over there. Welcome to PA although I am a year late. haha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mallow Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 Very cool, I thought I remember seeing your location being over there. Welcome to PA although I am a year late. haha Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PennMan Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 Thanks for the data; I ran the average and came to 6.5". So if someone felt coerced to give an early number, 3" - 6" would seem reasonable, but mention that non-paved surfaces would see the most accumulations. I don't think ground temperatures would be that great of an issue up here, especially at night. No sun for 11 days, and we've struggled to crack 40* since Friday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jmister Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 Thanks. Are you in your office next door? I want to track this with you and Cory! Haha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EasternUSWX Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 Thanks. You're welcome. It is a chilly day. 46 here, looks like UNV is at 36? brr.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sauss06 Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 You're welcome. It is a chilly day. 46 here, looks like UNV is at 36? brr.. 46, you sittin in a sun lamp? its 41 here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mallow Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 Are you in your office next door? I want to track this with you and Cory! Haha Heh, no, still at home. Will be in around 5-ish, though. You should come by then to discuss the models! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jmister Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 Heh, no, still at home. Will be in around 5-ish, though. You should come by then to discuss the models! Ah, I'll probably out of here by then. Let's hope the EURO keeps its consistency. We should find out in 15-30 minutes... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eskimo Joe Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 Ah, I'll probably out of here by then. Let's hope the EURO keeps its consistency. We should find out in 15-30 minutes... FYI I'm all in if the 12z EURO holds serve. EDIT: It's going east. CTP is right, the ridge axis is too far east, so this is going to be a non-event for PA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EasternUSWX Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 FYI I'm all in if the 12z EURO holds serve. EDIT: It's going east. CTP is right, the ridge axis is too far east, so this is going to be a non-event for PA. That was a low blow. But it is just one slip up, could change. I just got my confidence smashed though. Then again now like 5 GFS members are west and RGEM/GGEM is west. This storm is stupid and I hate these weather models. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sauss06 Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 That was a low blow. But it is just one slip up, could change. I just got my confidence smashed though. Then again now like 5 GFS members are west and RGEM/GGEM is west. This storm is stupid and I hate these weather models. lol, don't you want to be a met? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NortheastPAWx Posted November 5, 2012 Author Share Posted November 5, 2012 lol, of course just when things start looking good, the ECM has to deliver a swift kick in the nuts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EasternUSWX Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 lol, don't you want to be a met? I am all in for a Jan 25, 2000 repeat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eskimo Joe Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 00z EURO had a negative tilt at 500mb, which allowed the surface low to tuck closer to the coast. But the 12z run shows a completely different story. Everything stays tilted positive and the storm just races out to sea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jmister Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 Yes, this puts a damper on our storm possibilities, but I would wait to see the Euro ensembles before jumping out the second-story window. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mallow Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 Boo Euro. Yes, this puts a damper on our storm possibilities, but I would wait to see the Euro ensembles before jumping out the second-story window. Please let us know what they show when they come out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Santa Clause Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 Euro east yikes! Could be a death blow this late in the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I-83 BLIZZARD Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 Not looking too bad down here. Still a could adjust either way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daxx Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 Not looking too bad down here. Still a couldf adjust either way. Yep, I was thinking the same thing. Just give me some snow, and I will be happy. It is only early November. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.