aldie 22 Posted October 31, 2012 Share Posted October 31, 2012 Im beginning to feel like Al Gore Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2O Posted October 31, 2012 Share Posted October 31, 2012 I only care if this gets me into the top 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattie g Posted October 31, 2012 Share Posted October 31, 2012 I didn't even bother to look closely at the scoring before RodneyS brought it up. And after looking at it, I have no idea how is was scored. Chalk up one for the social scientist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Chill Posted October 31, 2012 Author Share Posted October 31, 2012 LOL- I thought about breaking it down to single location after I did the spread when the contest was closed but I was too lazy and was more worried about losing power. I left it as a simplistic total value type of thing vs variance of each location. I do agree from an accuracy standpoint doing it per location and not an aggregate total would have been a better way to go. But this isn't the NFL and there isn't a replay booth so congrats leesburg and too bad BT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aldie 22 Posted October 31, 2012 Share Posted October 31, 2012 LOL- I thought about breaking it down to single location after I did the spread when the contest was closed but I was too lazy and was more worried about losing power. I left it as a simplistic total value type of thing vs variance of each location. I do agree from an accuracy standpoint doing it per location and not an aggregate total would have been a better way to go. But this isn't the NFL and there isn't a replay booth so congrats leesburg and too bad BT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWxLuvr Posted October 31, 2012 Share Posted October 31, 2012 LOL- I thought about breaking it down to single location after I did the spread when the contest was closed but I was too lazy and was more worried about losing power. I left it as a simplistic total value type of thing vs variance of each location. I do agree from an accuracy standpoint doing it per location and not an aggregate total would have been a better way to go. But this isn't the NFL and there isn't a replay booth so congrats leesburg and too bad BT. Average departure would be my suggestion. Doing on total allows departures to cancel each other. Having said that, thanks for the contest Bob. They are always fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LongRanger Posted October 31, 2012 Share Posted October 31, 2012 So, my unentered 175/0/0 guess would have won? bummer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RodneyS Posted November 1, 2012 Share Posted November 1, 2012 So, my unentered 175/0/0 guess would have won? bummer Yes -- comparable to the guy who was soaking one foot in a bucket of ice and the other foot in a pot of boiling water. On average, his feet were more comfortable than the guy soaking his feet in room temperature water. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huffwx Posted November 1, 2012 Share Posted November 1, 2012 Look, if we are going for fair, price is right mode, if you go over you're out is a must have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Chill Posted November 1, 2012 Author Share Posted November 1, 2012 Amongst all the controversy I have elected to donate Leesburg's prize winnings to Gary Johnson's campaign. Live and let live. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWxLuvr Posted November 1, 2012 Share Posted November 1, 2012 Amongst all the controversy I have elected to donate Leesburg's prize winnings to Gary Johnson's campaign. Live and let live. I expect the media to have this story any day now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aldie 22 Posted November 1, 2012 Share Posted November 1, 2012 I already donated my winnings to the NYC forum Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
needbiggerboat Posted November 1, 2012 Share Posted November 1, 2012 I thought this was for winds at 925MB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.