Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,910
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Gilkian8980
    Newest Member
    Gilkian8980
    Joined

hurricane sandy thread #2


forkyfork

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  On 10/26/2012 at 10:05 PM, jasonli18t said:

No, and at 1% neither does the NHC. That is statistically insignificant and you can always find anomalies like that.

Yea but even 1% in a lot for the NHC they rarely ever put that on any storm unless conditions are great. I don't even remember seeing it before she almost went Cat 3 by Cuba.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 10/26/2012 at 10:08 PM, user13 said:

Yea but even 1% in a lot for the NHC they rarely ever put that on any storm unless conditions are great. I don't even remember seeing it before she almost went Cat 3 by Cuba.

What does logic tell you? Do you think the storm is going to suddenly strengthen to a monstrous category 4 hurricane ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 10/26/2012 at 10:05 PM, Snow88 said:

There are a lot of trees around my area. They are going to take a beating.

hope that tree goes down on Ave Y ..the one that blocks my favorite streetlight..I had a good view 40 years from my apartment.. now just leaves..you know just in case I decide to move back in lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 10/26/2012 at 10:17 PM, user13 said:

lol obviously not it looks like crap right now but even a 1 in 100 chance of that happening is scary

There is no chance whatsoever. Stop this discussion

I agree with everyone saying the models are converging on a central NJ landfall. NHC is too far south

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I noticed the models are higher with the pressure at landfall, but still incredibly powerful, 955-960 is historically low for us even though it won't be the crazy 935-940 pressures models depicted yesterday but they are showing a lot more rain than I've seen. The gfs signals 5-10" over our area which would assure we saw some significant if not major flooding even though river levels are relatively low.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 10/26/2012 at 10:20 PM, Juliancolton said:

There are so many documents and graphics to look at for this event... why would you bother with the statistical values which are mostly irrelevant?

lol guys no need to get sassy I was just puzzled of why they would even put that in the realm of possibility on a official release.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 10/26/2012 at 10:24 PM, user13 said:

lol guys no need to get sassy I was just puzzled of why they would even put that in the realm of possibility on a official document

I'm guessing because they always would just to cover their behinds in the very very very remote chance it did happen. I'm also pretty sure this isn't the first time they've put in a 1% chance of something for a storm.

There's actually a greater chance of it being a tropical storm than a hurricane for that timeframe, by a 47% to 45% margin. The chance if it being anything higher than a Cat 1 looks pretty low.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...