Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,607
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

East Coast Threat/Sandy Part III


free_man

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I know we're not supposed to look at the NAM right now and blah blah blah. But its got Sandy sitting in a pretty prime spot at 84 hours. If it was on its own I'd say toss it...but the fact that its not all that dissimilar from the EC gives it some credibility. And I know we're still a ways off at this point and no one wants to pull the trigger on sounding alarms too soon...but I really don't think its too soon to be playing up the coastal flooding threat. People on the shoreline need to begin taking preparations. It's the least track dependent and most serious threat right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Likewise the closer and further west would be more in line with NJ, agreed with your logic.

The Euro runs have had this chug NNW very shortly; I think if we see that, a Delmarva/NJ/western LI landfall becomes more buyable.

If it sticks further east... the east end of the GFS ensemble tracks look better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Euro runs have had this chug NNW very shortly; I think if we see that, a Delmarva/NJ/western LI landfall becomes more buyable.

If it sticks further east... the east end of the GFS ensemble tracks look better.

Well if you look at water vapor, you can see the ULL to the west that will probably cause a NW jog. Even the GFS has that. Then the question is how much will it veer n then ne afterwards, timing of capture, and how quickly it's pulled back NW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know we're not supposed to look at the NAM right now and blah blah blah. But its got Sandy sitting in a pretty prime spot at 84 hours. If it was on its own I'd say toss it...but the fact that its not all that dissimilar from the EC gives it some credibility. And I know we're still a ways off at this point and no one wants to pull the trigger on sounding alarms too soon...but I really don't think its too soon to be playing up the coastal flooding threat. People on the shoreline need to begin taking preparations. It's the least track dependent and most serious threat right now.

Given the fact the storm has a fairly solid motion N now... I think a situation like the NAM won't verify. The NAM is always doing some funky stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given the fact the storm has a fairly solid motion N now... I think a situation like the NAM won't verify. The NAM is always doing some funky stuff.

To be honest I didn't look at the entire thing...only hour 84. I retract my defense of its credibility. That said, assuming there are no huge jumps east with the 12z suite...I still think its time to play up the coastal flooding threat for SNE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18osx1.jpg

If one has read the NHC's 11 am discussion, the last paragraph mentions that due to the expected structural changes that Sandy will undergo 72 + hours from now the "normal" tropical cyclone wind probabilities will UNDERESTIMATE the winds speeds, especially over areas WELL away from the actual TC/PT center.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for all the information contained in this thread. Millions of folks appear to be effected in some way or another. You have to worry about the post storm cold too. This is not August.

Especially for those (especially the elderly) that lose power for a few days and do not have generators

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah they said in their discussion that most of their products wouldn't work for a storm like this.

I get the feeling that (thank God) they will keep the storm a "storm" through landfall.

That would be by FAR the best thing to do, even if it's subtropical. As long as they have TS or Hurricane Warnings up, the public will not estimate the strength of the storm if they think it's just a coastal low.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So is the track pretty much set or is it possible to see a LF further north than NJ? Reason I ask is because some have stated that the Euro could be over amplifying the storm. If it is less amplified would that potentially lead to a LF between NYC and Boston?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So is the track pretty much set or is it possible to see a LF further north than NJ? Reason I ask is because some have stated that the Euro could be over amplifying the storm. If it is less amplified would that potentially lead to a LF between NYC and Boston?

Definitely not set by any stretch but that area is definitely shrinking in size.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So is the track pretty much set or is it possible to see a LF further north than NJ? Reason I ask is because some have stated that the Euro could be over amplifying the storm. If it is less amplified would that potentially lead to a LF between NYC and Boston?

There's still plenty of uncertainty in the track. Could be anywhere from S NJ to perhaps Maine. The most likely at this point is probably between Cape Cod and central NJ...but still 4 days out, plenty can change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given the fact the storm has a fairly solid motion N now... I think a situation like the NAM won't verify. The NAM is always doing some funky stuff.

What you're telling me the loop-de-loop it has Sandy doing over Miami is funky? :P However, at hour 54, it does have the s/w over Montana a bit stronger and a touch south and it's a bit stronger by hour 84 over the Ohio River Valley. That's I'm looking for when looking at the NAM (albeit with a ton of salt). That and to see how it's handling the block downstream.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definitely not set by any stretch but that area is definitely shrinking in size.

There's still plenty of uncertainty in the track. Could be anywhere from S NJ to perhaps Maine. The most likely at this point is probably between Cape Cod and central NJ...but still 4 days out, plenty can change.

Cool - thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...