Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,608
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Hurricane Sandy


Wonderdog

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I've read that a landfall in southern NJ would actually have stronger winds here than a direct hit. How about a landfall in NNJ/NYC? Irene-type winds?

It's going to be a Nor'easter and not an actual hurricane, so the maximum winds are usually spread out from the central core of the storm. But this is a new thing we're seeing, we'll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Comparison between the 18z GFS and the IAD sounding from Isabel

72403 IAD Sterling Observations at 00Z 19 Sep 2003

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

PRES HGHT TEMP DWPT RELH MIXR DRCT SKNT THTA THTE THTV

hPa m C C % g/kg deg knot K K K

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

1000.0 59

997.0 93 19.4 18.4 94 13.54 55 49 292.8 331.4 295.2

938.1 610 17.0 16.1 95 12.44 60 52 295.5 331.4 297.7

925.0 729 16.4 15.6 95 12.19 60 56 296.1 331.4 298.2

905.1 914 15.9 15.3 96 12.19 70 71 297.4 333.0 299.6

850.0 1450 14.6 14.3 98 12.20 85 71 301.4 337.6 303.6

812.8 1829 13.7 13.4 98 12.02 95 71 304.4 340.4 306.5

809.0 1869 13.6 13.3 98 12.00 95 71 304.6 340.7 306.9

728.7 2743 9.6 9.0 97 10.01 105 81 309.5 340.3 311.3

702.6 3048 8.1 7.5 96 9.38 110 72 311.1 340.2 312.9

700.0 3079 8.0 7.4 96 9.31 110 73 311.3 340.2 313.1

651.7 3658 5.1 4.7 97 8.26 110 72 314.5 340.6 316.0

72403 IAD Sterling Observations at 06Z 19 Sep 2003

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

PRES HGHT TEMP DWPT RELH MIXR DRCT SKNT THTA THTE THTV

hPa m C C % g/kg deg knot K K K

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

1000.0 -18

988.0 93 20.6 19.2 92 14.38 130 15 294.8 336.1 297.3

963.7 305 19.1 17.8 92 13.52 130 32 295.3 334.3 297.7

929.7 610 16.9 15.9 94 12.35 130 55 296.2 331.9 298.4

925.0 653 16.6 15.6 94 12.19 130 55 296.3 331.6 298.4

897.0 914 15.1 14.2 94 11.51 140 56 297.4 331.0 299.4

865.3 1219 13.4 12.7 95 10.76 140 66 298.7 330.3 300.6

850.0 1370 12.6 11.9 96 10.40 140 72 299.3 330.0 301.2

834.6 1524 12.3 11.8 97 10.54 140 73 300.6 331.9 302.5

804.8 1829 11.8 11.7 99 10.82 150 63 303.2 335.6 305.2

791.0 1974 11.6 11.6 100 10.96 152 60 304.5 337.4 306.5

776.0 2134 10.9 10.9 100 10.69 155 57 305.4 337.8 307.4

748.1 2438 9.7 9.7 100 10.19 155 57 307.3 338.3 309.2

post-1746-0-23581300-1351296229_thumb.pn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are those 85 to 90 kt winds at the 850 and 900mb level MN Transplant? Wow... And your comparison is showing Sandy will be stronger than Isabel, correct?

Looks like yes on both counts. Not a guarantee that what happens at 850 translates to the surface, but it is certainly interesting. I'll check a few more soundings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Per the 18Z GFS, its still snowing out here on Saturday. Those who can't come out this way to see the storm in action would still be able to see the results if they came next weekend. That is, if the GFS is correct, of course.

ne.gfsacctype18-45.gif

Was wondering when you'd turn up. I gotta find a way to get west of the apps

4.5 Liquid!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting. So you're suggesting possible underperform in surface winds? That would be welcome news from the "no power for a week would not be fun" camp. No power for four days ftw!

Not at all. Surface winds will be surface winds. The inversion suggests gusts may not reach the maximum potential of 85-90 kts seen on the sounding, but gusts could still peak out around strong TS/weak Cat 1 speeds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not at all. Surface winds will be surface winds. The inversion suggests gusts may not reach the maximum potential of 85-90 kts seen on the sounding, but gusts could still peak out around strong TS/weak Cat 1 speeds.

Well I wasn't expecting 100 mph wind gusts anyway lol. 20% deduction would be 75-80 mph (if that's the correct deduction to surface winds from the 900/850mb level to surface)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...