Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

October 2012 General Discussion


Powerball

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

:weenie: :weenie:

Even if you just mean thundergraupel, that is quite a weenieish statement imo. The chances that temps are just right and the precip rates enough are quite low, as Chistorm has also stated. Even so, if it happened, it would be difficult to term it "thundersnow" if it was just sleet or graupel.

Precipitation rates would be moderate to heavy in a thunderstorm, it would be snow and graupel if there was little melting in the boundary layer, which is possible with 850 temps 1-2 °C below freezing. There wouldn't be any sleet in a setup like tomorrow.

I'm glad you guys have figured out the weather, but this is a complex scenario tomorrow from my perspective, and considering how poorly the boundary layer is modeled I wouldn't blindly take the model precip types and boundary layer temps. The free atmosphere temps (850 and above) on the other hand are modeled much better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Precipitation rates would be moderate to heavy in a thunderstorm, it would be snow and graupel if there was little melting in the boundary layer, which is possible with 850 temps 1-2 °C below freezing. There wouldn't be any sleet in a setup like tomorrow.

I'm glad you guys have figured out the weather, but this is a complex scenario tomorrow from my perspective, and considering how poorly the boundary layer is modeled I wouldn't blindly take the model precip types and boundary layer temps. The free atmosphere temps (850 and above) on the other hand are modeled much better.

I agree that graupel is quite likely in spots, but you're the one calling for a chance of "thundersnow" lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's close enough to not completely blow off the chance of some wet flakes mixing in but the coverage is just going to be limited at best. Temps in the lowest km are scorching relatively speaking, the atmosphere will be pretty much saturated...there is no room for evaporational cooling so you are relying on heavy enough precip rates in any one spot. There might be a decent chance if you were looking out the window at the top of the Willis tower but otherwise it's going to require a lot of luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that graupel is quite likely in spots, but you're the one calling for a chance of "thundersnow" lol.

Thundersnow = thunder + snow. So a bit of snow and thunder during a cell generated by steep lapse rates tomorrow would be considered thundersnow. It's not that big of a deal.

If boundary temperatures are a little above freezing we'll have graupel and snow mixed, if temps are solidly above freezing below 850 through the column there will only be some graupel in the heaviest parts of the cell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Precipitation rates would be moderate to heavy in a thunderstorm, it would be snow and graupel if there was little melting in the boundary layer, which is possible with 850 temps 1-2 °C below freezing. There wouldn't be any sleet in a setup like tomorrow.

I'm glad you guys have figured out the weather, but this is a complex scenario tomorrow from my perspective, and considering how poorly the boundary layer is modeled I wouldn't blindly take the model precip types and boundary layer temps. The free atmosphere temps (850 and above) on the other hand are modeled much better.

Not impossible I guess. If snow were to make it to the ground I would expect it over the higher terrain west and north of Madison. The 4km NAM was showing snow making it to the ground out by Sioux Falls, and Sioux City.

Getting waves of moderate rain swinging through. Should pick up 0.5" no problem through midnight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Precipitation rates would be moderate to heavy in a thunderstorm, it would be snow and graupel if there was little melting in the boundary layer, which is possible with 850 temps 1-2 °C below freezing. There wouldn't be any sleet in a setup like tomorrow.

I'm glad you guys have figured out the weather, but this is a complex scenario tomorrow from my perspective, and considering how poorly the boundary layer is modeled I wouldn't blindly take the model precip types and boundary layer temps. The free atmosphere temps (850 and above) on the other hand are modeled much better.

Pretty sure no one is blindly using model precip type. It's not only how model guidance is projecting UA/boundary layer temps, but prior history and knowledge on these types of setups. The fact of the matter is that if it occurs it will be isolated at best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty impressed by the wind reports coming out of the Dakotas today and tonight. Even now parts of those areas are getting 55+mph gusts. Due to the track of the surface low we never will get in to the strong winds here.

Picked up 0.67" of rain late afternoon and early evening. Already over 2.5" for the month, so we're doing much better than last month.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty impressed by the wind reports coming out of the Dakotas today and tonight. Even now parts of those areas are getting 55+mph gusts. Due to the track of the surface low we never will get in to the strong winds here.

Picked up 0.67" of rain late afternoon and early evening. Already over 2.5" for the month, so we're doing much better than last month.

Yeah they are going to get blasted in the northern Plains. Shouldn't have trouble seeing some gusts over 60 mph tomorrow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

0.62" of rain today, things have cleared out and the temperature is slowly dropping, 52 °F at the moment. The high for Thursday will occur at midnight.

Very strong winds making it into Iowa now. Estherville reporting 52mph gusts.

HRRR gives a good idea of who will get high winds and who won't, northern Illinois, Wisconsin, and most of Minnesota are going to stay near the center of the low where the pressure gradient is weak.

http://rapidrefresh.noaa.gov/hrrrconus/jsloop.cgi?dsKeys=hrrr:&runTime=2012101800&plotName=gust_t210m&fcstInc=60&numFcsts=16&model=hrrr&ptitle=HRRR%20Model%20Fields%20-%20Experimental&maxFcstLen=15&fcstStrLen=-1&resizePlot=1&domain=t2&wjet=1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having a cold Halloween is nice, just like having a White Christmas is nice, perfect kind of entrance into the wintry time of year.

Big Halloween snowstorm is one thing I'd love to experience. Will probably have to go somewhere else though because it might be 200 years before it happens in LAF. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got kind of ripped off on the rain tonight. Only 0.34". Just some mist right now. Better luck with instability showers over the next 2 days.

Fall color is at it's peak right now around here. Good thing it won't be too windy, otherwise a lot of the color would vanish by the weekend!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Next week looks quite mild. Could have a few days well into the 70s around here if everything works out.

Izzi had a nice discussion on this:

BIG PATTERN CHANGE STILL ON TAP SUNDAY THROUGH THE FIRST HALF OF

NEXT WEEK AS ANOTHER POWERHOUSE NORTHERN STREAM UPPER LOW CLOSES OFF

OVER WESTERN NOAM RESULTING IN AMPLIFICATION OF A RIDGE DOWNSTREAM

IN OUR NECK OF THE WOODS. SUNDAY WE SHOULD BE ABLE TO TACK ON

ANOTHER 10F ONTO SATURDAY`S HIGHS WITH TEMPS RETURNING INTO THE MID

TO UPPER 60S AS WARM AIR ADVECTION BEGINS TO REALLY GET GOING. THE

PRECISE DETAILS OF MONDAY THROUGH WEDNESDAY WILL HINGE ON WHERE

FRONT ENDS UP...WITH GFS AND ECMWF KEEPING IT GENERALLY NORTH OF THE

CWA. HOWEVER...AT THIS DISTANCE IT LOOKS TO BE CLOSE ENOUGH TO

REQUIRE AT LEAST SOME CHANCE POPS EACH DAY OF THE EXTENDED IN CASE

IT DOES SLIP SOUTH...EVEN THOUGH THIS MAY GIVE THE UNREALISTIC

IMPRESSION THAT IT WILL BE A WET PERIOD WHEN IN FACT THE MAJORITY OF

THE TIME LOOKS DRY.

SHOULD THE FRONT AND PRECIP HANG UP TO OUR NORTH THEN THE

STAGE WOULD BE SET FOR TEMPERATURES TO SOAR TO UNSEASONABLY WARM

LEVELS. BOTH THE LAST COUPLE RUNS OF THE GFS AND ECMWF HAVE BEEN

ADVERTISING 850MB TEMPS IN THE 12-15C RANGE MON-WED WITH 925MB TEMPS

BETWEEN 15-19C. LOOKING BACK AT SOME HISTORICAL COMPARISONS TO

SIMILAR 850MB/925MB TEMPS WITH SIMILAR 500MB HEIGHTS (574-579DM)

YIELDED HIGHS IN THE MID TO UPPER 70S THIS TIME OF YEAR. THE AVERAGE

850MB/925MB TEMPS FOR THE HANDFUL OF 80 DEGREE DAYS SINCE 1979 THE

LAST HALF OF OCTOBER WERE AROUND 17C (850MB) AND 19-20C (925MB)...SO

IF CURRENT FORECASTS VERIFY WE AREN`T TERRIBLY FAR FROM THAT. EVEN

THE MEX GUIDANCE WHICH TENDS TO BE WEIGHTED MORE TOWARD CLIMO IN THE

LONGER RANGE HAS TEMPS IN THE 70S. FINALLY...FOR THE LAST HALF OF

OCTOBER...WHEN 850MB TEMPS ARE 11.5C OR WARMER HIGH TEMPS REACH AT

LEAST 68F 90% OF THE TIME. GIVEN ALL THIS HAVE GONE WARMER THAN THE

ALLBLEND INITIALIZATION TEMPS FOR HIGHS AND LOWS...BUT STILL

SIGNIFICANTLY BELOW HOW WARM WE COULD POTENTIALLY BE DUE TO THE

INHERENT UNCERTAINTIES IN LONGER RANGE FORECASTS...INCLUDING CLOUD

COVER AND PRECIP IF THE FRONT IS CLOSER.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...