Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Hurricane Isaac Banter Thread, Part 2


Recommended Posts

I've mentioned the NHC intensity calls as being pretty good so far. I mean...I'm no TC expert, but I think they have done well in their thinking. It's clearly fighting a few factors and despite it looking like it will strengthen...probably will a bit..these things sometimes just don't want to obey weenies hopes. We'll see what happens today.

Scott you know I've been down on this one for 4+ days. I'm not even close to an expert but I've seen enough of these to believe this was one of those large disorganized storms that fails to get it together. The much discussed/disputed anomalies over the eastern gulf may have had some play in this too. With this type of large system I swear sometimes they're better off getting disrupted more by land south of Florida. Seems to allow them to pull back together. This one has that outer ring of mid level dry air that it cannot seem to shake or ingest fully, each time convection fires it draws more in collapsing the convection. The outflow apparent in the SW quadrant right now might be a clue to what's been going on with the pulses.Looks to me like it's about to shed the convection on the SE side. If it's going to strengthen it's right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 274
  • Created
  • Last Reply

In addition to the issues of a large diffuse storm with a chronically disorganized center that just can't seem to capitalize on 24+ hours of a favorable environment, deja-vu with several TCs in the past few years...

How much do people think the southeastern/plains drought is playing a factor here? Dry air continues to be ingested around the north, obvious on the vis sat...

I know it's apples and oranges, but the record low # of Plains tornadoes this year was a different manifestation of this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 75 MPH threshold is for sustained winds. Just because there was a wind gust reported at higher than 75 MPH doesn't mean it is a hurricane. I actually applaud the NHC for not upgrading this. I feel they have been too liberal with naming and upgrading storms in past seasons. Last thing we need is to call this a strong Cat 1 or weak Cat 2 based on a wind gust, then the next time around when there is a storm coming through with 90-100 MPH sustained winds, people try to ride it out because from experiencing Isaac, it wasn't that bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In addition to the issues of a large diffuse storm with a chronically disorganized center that just can't seem to capitalize on 24+ hours of a favorable environment, deja-vu with several TCs in the past few years...

How much do people think the southeastern/plains drought is playing a factor here? Dry air continues to be ingested around the north, obvious on the vis sat...

I know it's apples and oranges, but the record low # of Plains tornadoes this year was a different manifestation of this.

Obvious on the WV too that the storm is drawing in a lot of dry air from the northern semi-circle and as a result what we have is a storm alternating between looking better and not so much. The northern part of the storm continues to mostly offset the draw from the south. Pretty remarkable really. BTW agree with those that are glad to see the NHC go back to being less liberal. When we get sustained SURFACE hurricane force winds by all means upgrade, until then this is fine.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There can be little argument that historically they have been overzealous with intensity much more often than they have been conservative. Apparently they are trying to change that now, which is their prerogative of course. It is a little confusing for an enthusiast that what makes a hurricane one year does not the next but something tells me they don't lay awake at night worrying if people like me will approve of their forecasts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15Z Update: Honing down on Boothville and New Orleans Area. For Boothville looking at general increase in winds to around 50mph around 17Z. Then some intermitted gusts up to 71mph after 23Z through 15Z. The forecasted wind speed on my Smartcast have been trending slightly downward. A previous peak of 90mph down to around 78mph. Still looking at next 24hrs rain accumulation os 1.8 to 3.4”. For the New Orleans area looking at winds to hover around 35mph through 22Z, then increasing to 40-50 with tempo winds up to 74mph from 22Z through 15Z.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's usually around this time people start speculating the storm was secretly seeded. :-/

who woulda thought as it was crossing into the gulf, that we'd still have a TS on our hands.. wow

Oh you mean project storm fury that created an idea of double wind maximums and secondary eyewalls before there was such a thing as secondary eyewalls? In this case I think dry air might have more to do with it.

And the NHC refuses to upgrade the storm in the name of "scientific accuracy", yet the very records they are trying to protect become compromised when a 976mb, 90kt FL, 63kt SFMR, 70kt dropsonde is called a tropical storm.

Edit: 975mb...new dropsonde data

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is unbelievable for a tropical storm. And for the SFMR huggers that is a 66kt unflagged SFMR, and 94kt FL. unreal this is a tropical storm

155000 2808N 08735W 8441 01391 //// +156 //// 181092 094 066 021 01

155030 2807N 08733W 8425 01413 9912 +170 +170 183092 094 064 010 01

155100 2807N 08732W 8431 01414 9916 +180 +180 183091 093 066 007 01

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh you mean project storm fury that created an idea of double wind maximums and secondary eyewalls before there was such a thing as secondary eyewalls? In this case I think dry air might have more to do with it.

And the NHC refuses to upgrade the storm in the name of "scientific accuracy", yet the very records they are trying to protect become compromised when a 976mb, 90kt FL, 63kt SFMR, 70kt dropsonde is called a tropical storm.

Because of it's rogue characteristics, I agree it should be classified as something stronger than a TS. Just it's TS wind field expansion is larger than with some of the strongest hurricanes out there. Kinda reminds me of JB a couple years ago bringing up a new forumula for tropical systems... I forget his specifics, but agree that something needs to be done here. People typically see TS's as wimpy, wimpy, wimpy.. As the strength and duration of Isaac may result in more damage than a strong hurricane.

Almost seems like a pattern the last few years, with these types of tropical systems being more 'spread out'...and with unusually low pressures and strength over greater distances..

A north-east wind from 20 to 30 MPH (with higher gusts) for 18 hours already in the New Orleans area..while landfall is still like 12 hours away. Water has to be piling up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Turtle Hurricane Center (THC) is upgrading Isaac to a hurricane with 80 mph sustained winds at 11 am.

As an oldster who has been following this youngster on EasternWx and now here I say: AMEN! Go Turtle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is about as bad as that moment I read Irene wasn't a cat 1 at landfall in jersey since I rode out the "eye" at the beach in that one.

Seriously, this is a storm that will hopefully provide info on why when everything seems to be perfect for strengthening in models 3 days out doesn't come to fruition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There can be little argument that historically they have been overzealous with intensity much more often than they have been conservative.

I think there's a LOT of argument. Take a look at every storm that has RIed an/dor reached Category 4 or 5, and I guarantee there was a serious underforecast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obvious on the WV too that the storm is drawing in a lot of dry air from the northern semi-circle and as a result what we have is a storm alternating between looking better and not so much. The northern part of the storm continues to mostly offset the draw from the south. Pretty remarkable really. BTW agree with those that are glad to see the NHC go back to being less liberal. When we get sustained SURFACE hurricane force winds by all means upgrade, until then this is fine.

Good to see you posting again.

I too laud NHC adhering to strict criteria.

Weather is one of the few realms where government-funded agencies (NWS, NOAA, NHC, etc) do not mix in politics. The scientific purity has kept an incredibly high quality for a federal product, and I hope it stays that way.

Now perhaps it can be argued that central pressure should have greater weight in the criteria, or that there should be a "Severe Tropical Storm" entity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think there's a LOT of argument. Take a look at every storm that has RIed an/dor reached Category 4 or 5, and I guarantee there was a serious underforecast.

Ok, point taken. What I was trying to refer to was listed sustained winds at landfall v. surface observation. I know friction causes some reduction of winds, but when a storm is listed at 90mph sustained and the highest gust measured on land is 65mph, the intensity was overdone. I will admit I base this mostly on anecdotal evidence, thus why it's in the banter thread, but I would be very surprised if it was not true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So will 75 mph be the highest point strength wise- or do any of you expect any strengthening whatsoever as it moves closer to the coast?

I would normally expect a hurricane in this position to be weakening right now, but Isaac is only now coming together structurally. I'll guess we see a little more strengthening, but only for 6-8 hours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...