Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Isaac Heavy Rain Event


Hoosier

Recommended Posts

This is usually true near/shortly after landfall but heaviest precip often tends to shift along/west of track by the time storms make it here. Models haven't been showing it as much for this event, possibly because this is more of a ridge rounder and not really phasing with another system (just a guess)?

Yeah, you're right. Thinking back to Frances in 2004 and Katrina in 2005, that was the case. And I'd concur that the lack of phasing might be keeping the models from forming a deformation zone once it reaches the midwest (lotsa dry air being fed into the northern flank of the storm by that blocky ridge). I gotta say though, looking at the GFS with its blob like 6-hour precip bombs, it's got me thinking it's sufferring from convective feedback. Not sure how must weight it's QPF distribution can be given.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 421
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Latest HPC QPF discussion

DAYS 2 AND 3...

...ISAAC...

ALTHOUGH ISAAC CONTINUES TO WEAKEN...ISAAC'S INFLUENCE REMAINS

QUITE EXPANSIVE AND IS MOVING SLOWLY...IN FACT MORE SLOWLY THAN

ANTICIPATED WHICH HAS THE BEEN THE MODEL TREND THE LAST COUPLE

DAYS. THE LATEST NHC TRACK FORECAST...WHICH FORMED THE BASIS FOR

THE DAY 2/3 QPF...IS ALMOST 50 PERCENT SLOWER COMPARED TO

FORECASTS GENERATED A COUPLE DAYS AGO. THE 12Z GUIDANCE WHICH

CONFORMS BEST TO THE LATEST NHC TRACK...ABOUT MIDWAY BETWEEN THE

12Z ECMWF/UKMET AND A LITTLE OF THE GFS WHEN WE CONSIDER DAY

3...SEEMS TO RESPOND TO THE SLOWER TRACK BY PRODUCING HIGHER QPF

THROUGH THE PERIOD MAINLY FROM THE LONGER DURATION. THIS IS

ESPECIALLY NOTICEABLE BEGINNING WITH THE MIDDLE OF DAY 2 (12Z SAT)

OVER CENTRAL MISSOURI...AND THEN CONTINUES THROUGH THE REMAINDER

OF THE PERIOD. OTHER THAN USING A BLEND OF THE 12Z ECMWF/UKMET

QPF AND NHC TRACK FORECAST AS GUIDES...AMOUNTS WERE GENERALLY

INCREASED ABOVE GUIDANCE TO ACCOUNT FOR THE INADEQUATE RESOLUTION

OF THE MODELS AND LOW QPF BIASES THAT OFTEN ACCOMPANY DECAYING

TROPICAL EVENTS SUCH AS POTENTIAL INCREASES IN NOCTURNAL

DEVELOPMENT AS THE BOUNDARY LAYER BEGINS TO DECOUPLE...AND MORE

EFFICIENT RAINFALL PRODUCTION VIA WARM RAIN PROCESSES AND

DROP-SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS FOCUSED TOWARD THE SMALL SIZE OF THE

SPECTRUM. THE FINAL DAY 2 VALUES ARE CLOSEST TO THE UKMET AND

CANADIAN WITH SPATIAL ADJUSTMENT ALSO MADE...WHILE THE DAY 3

TOTALS ARE BETWEEN THE UKMET/ECMWF/CANADIAN. HIGHER TOTALS ARE

ANTICIPATED LOCALLY. HOWEVER...CONFIDENCE IN DETERMINING EXACTLY

WHEN AND WHERE IS LESS THAN IDEAL GIVEN THE ABOVE MENTIONED

CONCERNS.

FROM A LARGER PERSPECTIVE...MOISTURE ANOMALIES SUCH AS PW REMAIN

IMPRESSIVELY HIGH...WITH VALUES NEARING 3.5 STANDARD DEVIATIONS

ABOVE NORMAL...WHICH SHOULD NOT BE TOO SURPRISING GIVEN THE

REGIME. ADDITIONALLY...AS ISAAC LOSES ITS TROPICAL

CHARACTERISTICS...CONVERSION TO A MORE BAROCLINIC SYSTEM WITH A

WARM FRONTAL BAND SEEMS INEVITABLE...WHICH IS DEPICTED WITHIN THE

GUIDANCE. DETERMINING HOW MUCH QPF TO INSERT FOR THIS PROCESS

ALONE IS DIFFICULT TO DETERMINE...BUT WOULD NOT BE SURPRISED TO

SEE AMOUNTS HIGHER THAN FORECAST GENERATED AND MOVE MORE QUICKLY

AS MOISTURE IS RAPIDLY TRANSPORTED DOWNSTREAM...THUS SEEDING NEW

DEVELOPMENT. ACCORDINGLY...SLIGHT AND MODERATE EXCESSIVE RAINFALL

AREAS WERE HIGHLIGHTED AND SHOULD ALIGN WELL WITH THE LATEST DAY 1

QPF AND EXCESSIVE RAINFALL FORECASTS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol 18z GFS dumps on central/northern IL but doesn't get up to the IL/WI border.

That map is funny, but at the same time it is not. Would like to see that D3 area wiped out near the border. Although this area has benefited from lake rains. Hopefully the steering currents can lift that low a bit north of its forecasted track.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Low wouldn't have to shift very far north of its track to get this area. That's one of the sharpest cutoffs in qpf I've seen on the GFS!

Looks like Quincy to Peoria to Joliet would be ground zero for the heaviest rain in this case.

GFS_3_2012083018_F96_PCPIN_96_HR.png

Just across this county which is about 20 miles from N to S (as the crow flies), there is 3" in the SE corner and < 0.10" in the farthest northern fringe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just as a frame of reference, here's the 1981-10 normal precipitation totals in September for a few sites in Indiana. We'll see how many can get to or surpass their normals this Saturday and Sunday.

Bloomington BMG: 3.72"

South Bend SBN: 3.53"

Indianapolis IND: 3.12"

Evansville EVV: 3.05"

Muncie MIE: 3.01"

Fort Wayne FWA: 2.80"

Lafayette LAF: 2.66"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just as a frame of reference, here's the 1981-10 normal precipitation totals in September for a few sites in Indiana. We'll see how many can get to or surpass their normals this Saturday and Sunday.

Bloomington BMG: 3.72"

South Bend SBN: 3.53"

Indianapolis IND: 3.12"

Evansville EVV: 3.05"

Muncie MIE: 3.01"

Fort Wayne FWA: 2.80"

Lafayette LAF: 2.66"

Chad still going 1-3" for the area. Interestingly he thinks the highest amounts may be north, which would be more in line with the GFS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NAM still isn't impressive. Has that little "explosion" over a small chunk of Iowa and just sorta drifts eastward. I don't really think big rains make it into Ohio.

The convective feedback issues probably will make modeling pretty useless. It will either hit you or it won't.

Using the NAM at this juncture for something still 2-3 days out is like throwing a dart at a dart board. You are better off not looking at it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im not real confident in the any model QPF right now. They change every single run and there has been no consistency for days. I really dont know what to expect with this. If you ask me though, the GGEM has been the most consistent model the last few days. This is def. not a forecast I'd like to have to make for the public.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm really liking Champaign, which will be fun since they have the home opener Saturday....and they really need the rain

Agreed about Champaign. Think the totals in IL will be the most impressive in this region.

Purdue's home opener is a 3:30pm start tomorrow, which could make it a little more interesting (rain taking a bit longer to get this far east). Real grass at Ross-Ade Stadium too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...