Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,611
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

December 18-20 Talking Points - Part 2


am19psu

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 963
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Such a shift from last year when everything was midatlantic missing the NE rather than coast missing inland. These storms always making me nervous though like early Dec '05 when NYC was supposed to get a solid 4to8 but ended up with much less while LI got a decent amount. Usually you can't tell until the final 12 to 24 hours just how close the heavy snows will make it.

With that being said I'd be very happy with a 3 to 5" snow event.

we've seen this with storms before...long range threat shows a big storm, the models lose the storm ots only to trend back west in this time frame. Not saying this is the case but the gfs is a good start.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chris (Bluewave) made a really good post in the general thread, saying how this run looks very similar to the 0z Euro from last night, except that it had a better southern stream. As long as we continue the trends to move that PV westward, which helps to amplify the trough, along with a decent southern stream, we definitely are still in the game.

The Euro, although meager at the surface, was loaded with potential...it just so happened that the southern stream was pretty much non-existent. Perhaps that could have something to do with the hanging energy back to the south west bias? Hopefully...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we've seen this with storms before...long range threat shows a big storm, the models lose the storm ots only to trend back west in this time frame. Not saying this is the case but the gfs is a good start.

Exactly my thought. Deja vu. GFS shows a hit, jumps east. trends back west. How far is TBD. Other outcome is that the GFS is simply wrong. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know the set up is different than last year Decembers storm, but all this is feeling like such a dejavu. Models show storm 7 days out, then show it east 4-6 days out and people jump ship early, then 3 days out the models all show a slow westward trend with the Euro being the last one to catch on. And then bam the storm is back. Could it happen here? Let's hope so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some have said usally the ukemt might forshadow what the ecm would do.........

Only because their physics and initialization schemes are similar. Look at last weekend, when the Euro was the farthest west solution (and ended up correct) and UKM was the farthest east for multiple runs in a row. These are independent events and the UKM really doesn't portend anything about the Euro run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chris (Bluewave) made a really good post in the general thread, saying how this run looks very similar to the 0z Euro from last night, except that it had a better southern stream. As long as we continue the trends to move that PV westward, which helps to amplify the trough, along with a decent southern stream, we definitely are still in the game.

The Euro, although meager at the surface, was loaded with potential...it just so happened that the southern stream was pretty much non-existent. Perhaps that could have something to do with the hanging energy back to the south west bias? Hopefully...

Ideally we want the PV to split like the 12/14 12Z GFS showed, made a perfect path right up the coast. Unless someone disagrees I think that is by far the best we could hope for. The current 12z GFS scenario with the PV sliding west I think is the second best case scenario.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only because their physics and initialization schemes are similar. Look at last weekend, when the Euro was the farthest west solution (and ended up correct) and UKM was the farthest east for multiple runs in a row. These are independent events and the UKM really doesn't portend anything about the Euro run.

Thanks for explaining that to me...i would always here that, but it seem it would never be proven. Thanks again

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some notes on the 12Z GFS. Correct me if I am wrong, I am not a met.

post-1687-0-59003100-1292430848.gif

1) PV "trended" west from 00Z run. This is good in that it will allow the storm to come west and not OTS.

2) No blocking in 50/50 position to slow the storm down.

3) That piece out there in the atlantic may help "force" the low up the coast and not OTS. ? It seems like the storm would be forced to head up somewhere in that open area (2).

Decent run. Hopefully it continues to trend west. :snowman:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ideally we want the PV to split like the 12/14 12Z GFS showed, made a perfect path right up the coast. Unless someone disagrees I think that is by far the best we could hope for. The current 12z GFS scenario with the PV sliding west I think is the second best case scenario.

I think this is probably the most likely scenario because other models, particularly the Euro don't show much of a split in the PV and rather have it stay intact. So if that's how it going to be let the thing move west then all together. I'll take that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this is probably the most likely scenario because other models, particularly the Euro don't show much of a split in the PV and rather have it stay intact. So if that's how it going to be let the thing move west then all together. I'll take that.

The NAM is showing a split. I have a great feeling about the NAM and last year it performed very well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some notes on the 12Z GFS. Correct me if I am wrong, I am not a met.

1) PV "trended" west from 00Z run. This is good in that it will allow the storm to come west and not OTS.

2) No blocking in 50/50 position to slow the storm down.

3) That piece out there in the atlantic may help "force" the low up the coast and not OTS. ? It seems like the storm would be forced to head up somewhere in that open area (2).

Decent run. Hopefully it continues to trend west. :snowman:

Actually the storm moves very slowly from south of Cape Cod into the Gulf of Maine as it gets captured and vertically stacked with mid/upper levels. The cutoff that forms stays basically in place as the block is well established. I don't really like the 50/50 low term as I believe its implications are poorly understood.

The cutoff needs to form early enough and westward enough for the surface storm to linger in our vicinity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is exactly why I mentioned last night that this threat can't be written off based on the volatility of all the players on the field. If the polar vortex cooperates and gets out of the way soon enough, it probably wouldn't take a strong disturbance to ride up the coast and deliver a significant snow to our area. It might matter for DC and south, since the disturbance would have to strengthen and wrap up into a Noreaster in time for them, but it would almost certainly benefit us and New England. Models today (and the 0z Euro last night) are suggesting that the vortex will split very nicely and allow whatever develops to come north. Not to mention the fact that in Ninas, the north and west solution almost always wins out anyway. Hopefully the Euro jumps on board to a storm today and then tonight/tomorrow we juicen it up and strengthen it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...