Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,586
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

12/19-12/20 threat


CoastalWx

Recommended Posts

Good God.....I was all ready to shut it down after the 0z GFS diarrhea knowing I wouldn't get any sleep over it but then I had to drop the kids off at the pool and came back to this......I mean what a ride.....:blink:.......still won't get any sleep.....man...how does it look for HFD? Too far west?

And why am I having to refresh eight times before it actually refreshes.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Gfs is going to end up on an island, Watch all the other models come west as it goes east............ :arrowhead:

popcorn.gifNot quite but Dr. No changes his mind just when the GFS wavered so we can't truly say that the GFS wins...

Still feeling like this is in the 60/40 range on whether or not it'll happen but it's so encouraging to finally have the euro show what might happen with it's upper level setup and basically any tiny bit of southern energy to latch onto.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's called consistency.. I don't care what the ecm shows run to run. It's showed a pretty favorable 500mb pattern it just had absolutely no s/w. I am confident there will be a s/w and in this pattern it will amplify.

It's not any consistency...all the models were trending away from a favorable southern stream until the 0z ECM came in more amplified. The 18z GFS and 0z GFS had actually trended away from the storm and more towards what the ECM showed earlier, which was the weaker shortwave not being able to amplify enough in a more zonal flow....even the 0z NAM looked further east than the 18z NAM if you extrapolate it out significantly. So I'm still not convinced...I've always had some problems with this storm and to say a model is "locked in" at 96-100 hrs just because one run is better after five off-shore runs in a row seems ridiculous. Now the models are reversed with the GFS being a miss and the ECM being a hit, although the GFS ENS were further west which is a warning flag in some cases. I don't think this is a high-confidence forecast at all, and I just took objection to you congratulating yourself based on one model run. When the snow starts falling outside my window, then I'll say you made a good call.

I think this qualifies as eating crow. Even if it does trend back east (which I don't think it will very much) one of the solutions will fail.

The ECM tends to have a "burp" run once in a while, I'm wondering if this is such a run. It usually locks into a solution run-to-run 90% of the runs but then one run deviates from the norm. We'll see if this is the beginning of a trend towards a better southern stream and more amplification with the PV phase or just a bunch of hocus-pocus. But the ECM isn't perfect either unfortunately, just well better than the other garbage models.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not any consistency...all the models were trending away from a favorable southern stream until the 0z ECM came in more amplified. The 18z GFS and 0z GFS had actually trended away from the storm and more towards what the ECM showed earlier, which was the weaker shortwave not being able to amplify enough in a more zonal flow....even the 0z NAM looked further east than the 18z NAM if you extrapolate it out significantly. So I'm still not convinced...I've always had some problems with this storm and to say a model is "locked in" at 96-100 hrs just because one run is better after five off-shore runs in a row seems ridiculous. Now the models are reversed with the GFS being a miss and the ECM being a hit, although the GFS ENS were further west which is a warning flag in some cases. I don't think this is a high-confidence forecast at all, and I just took objection to you congratulating yourself based on one model run. When the snow starts falling outside my window, then I'll say you made a good call.

The ECM tends to have a "burp" run once in a while, I'm wondering if this is such a run. It usually locks into a solution run-to-run 90% of the runs but then one run deviates from the norm. We'll see if this is the beginning of a trend towards a better southern stream and more amplification with the PV phase or just a bunch of hocus-pocus. But the ECM isn't perfect either unfortunately, just well better than the other garbage models.

Dude I'm not congratulating myself.. I'm just saying this is what I thought and still think will happen.. a substantial storm for SNE. I'm just pumped that this is what the ECM is finally showing

What was a 'burp' was the 00z GFS.. it is way east of the ensemble mean and ensemble mean is usually too far east.

Also the 00z NAM would not be east of the 18z NAM. The 00z NAM would be a big hit for ESNE just very similar to the 18z NAM.

The ecm didn't come in with a stronger CA s/w than the other models. It just came in with slightly more of a CA s/w than the 12z ECM, but basically identical to the 00z GFS and much flatter than the 12z GFS.

All I can say is I have seen flips like this happen many times before and I highly doubt it goes back to its old solution. My forecast isn't based on any of the individual model deterministic solutions.. it's based on what I think the overall 500mb pattern will be and the strength of the s/w. LOCK IT UP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking better for you Easterners. Not sure if it gets back to ENY, but a low just off Chatham does generally get deformation back this far historically.

Great night here tonight with continuous LES bands ..over 2.5" so far and moderate + snow now. 14.8F.

It's not any consistency...all the models were trending away from a favorable southern stream until the 0z ECM came in more amplified. The 18z GFS and 0z GFS had actually trended away from the storm and more towards what the ECM showed earlier, which was the weaker shortwave not being able to amplify enough in a more zonal flow....even the 0z NAM looked further east than the 18z NAM if you extrapolate it out significantly. So I'm still not convinced...I've always had some problems with this storm and to say a model is "locked in" at 96-100 hrs just because one run is better after five off-shore runs in a row seems ridiculous. Now the models are reversed with the GFS being a miss and the ECM being a hit, although the GFS ENS were further west which is a warning flag in some cases. I don't think this is a high-confidence forecast at all, and I just took objection to you congratulating yourself based on one model run. When the snow starts falling outside my window, then I'll say you made a good call.

The ECM tends to have a "burp" run once in a while, I'm wondering if this is such a run. It usually locks into a solution run-to-run 90% of the runs but then one run deviates from the norm. We'll see if this is the beginning of a trend towards a better southern stream and more amplification with the PV phase or just a bunch of hocus-pocus. But the ECM isn't perfect either unfortunately, just well better than the other garbage models.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6-10" for me, wow, can't believe I get that much but it is the truth....

Too bad it's just an image on a computer screen.

Guess I have to wait up for the 6z NAM now even though I have to sub tomorrow morning at 7:45.

Yes, and be nice to those kids tomorrow lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6-10" for me, wow, can't believe I get that much but it is the truth....

Too bad it's just an image on a computer screen.

Guess I have to wait up for the 6z NAM now even though I have to sub tomorrow morning at 7:45.

You dont get even close to that much. Maybe 2-3 inches..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't post very much but I agree with A-L-E-X. Flip flopping in the models is to be expected until the southern stream wave reaches the west coast and can get sampled. I think we will see much more consistent model runs once this happens (maybe as early as the 12 z run today but certainly the 00z Fri run).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...