Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,587
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

Severe weather thread number ...I think X ?


Typhoon Tip

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

From looking at other data and such I would actually think eastern PA into northern NJ and southeast NY into the Hudson would be the best area right now...certainly have to watch western CT/MA though.

sure you saw this, 12Z Nam for Thursday evening, 0-3km EHI:

post-3106-0-65611200-1343169749_thumb.pn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From looking at other data and such I would actually think eastern PA into northern NJ and southeast NY into the Hudson would be the best area right now...certainly have to watch western CT/MA though.

Busy and haven't had a chance to follow this much until recently, but I do like the CT river valley centered around HFD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do think there is a tornado/high end severe threat on Thursday. Timing of morning MCS activity as well as getting the warm front through will be key.

I kind of like the Euro depiction how it basically drapes the w/f right along the MA/CT border or just a bit south of that. That would be ideal. It also brings the MCS right along or just south of the Pike.

Hopefully we can get that out of here early

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do think there is a tornado/high end severe threat on Thursday. Timing of morning MCS activity as well as getting the warm front through will be key.

The lower-level EML is good and bad:

The bad:

1. In general, has more potential to mix into low levels

2. Reduces mid-level lapse rate

The good:

1. Doesn't take as much forcing and/or heating to break cap

2. Can increase the deep-layer CAPE

The morning MCS will leave a boundary somewhere from NE PA / N NJ into CT / NY and it will keep the LCL low if current modeling is correct.

The potential for a significant tornado is higher than normal with convection interacting with these features and with the associated pressure falls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The lower-level EML is good and bad:

The bad:

1. In general, has more potential to mix into low levels

2. Reduces mid-level lapse rate

The good:

1. Doesn't take as much forcing and/or heating to break cap

2. Can increase the deep-layer CAPE

The morning MCS will leave a boundary somewhere from NE PA / N NJ into CT / NY and it will keep the LCL low if current modeling is correct.

The potential for a significant tornado is higher than normal with convection interacting with these features and with the associated pressure falls.

Yeah you can see a fairly sizable amount of CIN for surface based parcels on the 18z NAM. Not sure how this will evolve but whenever you see a modeled low/mid level jet like we have modeled in July/August/September I always take note.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...