Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,584
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

Severe weather thread number ...I think X ?


Typhoon Tip

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Lol. You're sarcastic, but support is there for the potential for 1-5 TORs, and the area highlighted (shifted 150 miles east from 1985) is spot on, at least as it looks now from several runs of the SREF and NAM.

This will be nothing like the 1985 tornado outbreak. That was arguably one of the more impressive outbreaks in the united states for the shear number of strong/violent long-track tornadoes over such a small geographic area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol. You're sarcastic, but support is there for the potential for 1-5 TORs, and the area highlighted (shifted 150 miles east from 1985) is spot on, at least as it looks now from several runs of the SREF and NAM.

fair enough. you could probably find a better event to shift though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I mentioned earlier, people really need to watch out in this I think where ever that warm front sets up tomorrow... along and south of it by 30 or so miles is tornado-tuesday from what I am looking at.

SPC echoed my thoughts in their update:

"...

ALONG THE WARM FRONTAL ZONE WHERE EFFECTIVE SRH AND STRONGEST

DEEP-LAYER SHEAR WILL BE MAXIMIZED. ALTHOUGH PINPOINTING THIS

CORRIDOR IS DIFFICULT GIVEN LIKELIHOOD OF PRECEDING OVERNIGHT

CONVECTION...IT APPEARS MOST PROBABLE FROM PARTS OF NY INTO SRN NEW

ENGLAND. SOME CONVECTION-ALLOWING GUIDANCE SUGGESTS THAT DISCRETE

CONVECTION MAY FORM WITHIN A PERSISTING WAA REGIME THU AFTERNOON."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This will be nothing like the 1985 tornado outbreak. That was arguably one of the more impressive outbreaks in the united states for the shear number of strong/violent long-track tornadoes over such a small geographic area.

I agree Ryan. I should have been clearer with posting the map.

The 1985 analog has been made by multiple others in this thread, but I think it's obvious to everyone this won't be nearly as prolific as 1985 (which also had over a dozen TORs in Ontario, 40+ TORs total in Canada/US... not even close).

Still, threat of 1-5 TORs in the area discussed, as well as significant wind/hail is there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree Ryan. I should have been clearer with posting the map.

The 1985 analog has been made by multiple others in this thread, but I think it's obvious to everyone this won't be nearly as prolific as 1985 (which also had over a dozen TORs in Ontario, 40+ TORs total in Canada/US... not even close).

Still, threat of 1-5 TORs in the area discussed, as well as significant wind/hail is there.

Including multiple violent, long trackers which caused some incredible damage...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree Ryan. I should have been clearer with posting the map.

The 1985 analog has been made by multiple others in this thread, but I think it's obvious to everyone this won't be nearly as prolific as 1985 (which also had over a dozen TORs in Ontario, 40+ TORs total in Canada/US... not even close).

Still, threat of 1-5 TORs in the area discussed, as well as significant wind/hail is there.

1985 is not even close to a good analog.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Greatest tornado threat I think is along the CT river valley south of BAF, centered around 6pm ish

seems that region actually has some of the better timing/collocation of maximized HEL and CAPE. and even though there isn't quite as much CAPE modeled...wouldn't surprise me if it sneaks a bit further N up the hudson valley either...up toward ALB or something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's too early to make calls like these, tbh...

It's guessing, that's what makes it fun, but to be realistic, i would say that at least a few tornadoes will be possible, my 10 to 15 tornado prediction if everything comes together

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...