Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,607
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

July 1-8, 2012 Heat & Storms


Herb@MAWS

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I think I see our first storm popping up just inside PA just north of Washington County in NW MD

That's good news it's pretty far north. I have no clue where the front is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's good news it's pretty far north. I have no clue where the front is.

It is a good sign... no ideawherethe front is with it bein so diffuse. 1630 SPC is same... mentions 12z KIAD RAOB shows steep lapse rates ~600mb and below... and MLCAPE of 3500 to 4000 possible as temps reach 100 to 105

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the high DP, it presently feels much worse today than yesterday. My high temp at home yesterday was 104.4. Already at 101.6 but a DP of 71 compared to yesterdays being in the high 50's at peak heating. Good CU field developing also in the last 30 mins. We just need rain, badly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MESOSCALE DISCUSSION 1433

NWS STORM PREDICTION CENTER NORMAN OK

1147 AM CDT SUN JUL 08 2012

AREAS AFFECTED...FAR ERN WV...CNTRL/NRN VA...MUCH OF MD/DE

CONCERNING...SEVERE POTENTIAL...WATCH LIKELY

VALID 081647Z - 081815Z

PROBABILITY OF WATCH ISSUANCE...80 PERCENT

SUMMARY...THUNDERSTORMS ARE FORECAST TO DEVELOP AND INCREASE IN

COVERAGE THIS AFTERNOON ACROSS FAR ERN WV INTO CNTRL/NRN VA AND MUCH

OF MD/DE. THIS ACTIVITY WILL POSE A THREAT FOR DAMAGING WIND GUSTS

AND LARGE HAIL. WW WILL LIKELY BE NEEDED.

DISCUSSION...MID-DAY MESOANALYSIS SHOWS A COLD FRONT SAGGING SWD

ACROSS FAR SRN PA...WHILE S OF THE FRONT...CLEAR SKIES HAVE ALLOWED

TEMPERATURES TO QUICKLY WARM INTO 90S TO AROUND 100F. THE HOT

SURFACE AIRMASS HAS AIDED IN STRONG BOUNDARY LAYER

DESTABILIZATION...WHILE EML PLUME EMANATING OUT OF THE WRN

CONUS...COMBINED WITH SURFACE DEWPOINTS IN THE MID 60S TO LOW

70S...IS CONTRIBUTING TO SBCAPE VALUES AOA 2000 J/KG. AS A

RESULT...AN ISOLATED THUNDERSTORM HAS RECENTLY DEVELOPED ALONG THE

FRONT OVER FAR S-CNTRL PA...WHILE CUMULUS FIELD OBSERVED IN VIS

IMAGERY IS DEEPENING OVER ERN WV/NRN VA. EXPECT THAT BOTH THE FRONT

AND CUMULUS FIELD WILL BE FAVORED AREAS FOR ADDITIONAL STORM

DEVELOPMENT DURING THE NEXT FEW HRS. THOUGH THE REGION RESIDES S OF

STRONGER MIDLEVEL WLYS...DEEP-LAYER WLY FLOW ACROSS THE WARM SECTOR

WILL YIELD 20-30 KT 0-6 KM BULK SHEAR...WHICH WILL BE SUFFICIENT FOR

STRONG/SVR MULTICELL CLUSTERS AND LINE SEGMENTS GIVEN THE

HOT/UNSTABLE AIRMASS. THESE STORMS WILL POSE A THREAT FOR DAMAGING

WINDS AND LARGE HAIL...AND A WW WILL LIKELY BE NEEDED FOR PART OF

THE MCD AREA.

..GARNER/WEISS.. 07/08/2012

ATTN...WFO...PHI...AKQ...LWX...RNK...PBZ...RLX...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CWG needs to do some digging into this 3 minutes nonsense.

someone posted this last night there

jimmyjohn1

7/7/2012 6:51 PM EDT

The observer was not quite correct. The temperature is averaged over each minute. Then, the five-minute average temperature is calculated from the five one-minute averages. The five-minute average temperature is what's recorded. It's a little more complicated than this, but that sums it up. You can read about the weather algorithms in the ASOS User's Guide (go to page 11 for temperature/dew point) at http://www.nws.noaa.gov/asos/aum-toc.pdf

Before the National Weather Service used ASOS, I believe the minimum and maximum temperatures were from instantaneous temperatures, but I could be wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

of course their method begs the question as to whether any home stations or people reading thermometers are correct with reported highs.

not sure why it has to be so complicated but i guess it helps cancel out jet blasts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

of course their method begs the question as to whether any home stations or people reading thermometers are correct with reported highs.

not sure why it has to be so complicated but i guess it helps cancel out jet blasts.

I guess so... but I think we would know if the temp went 104 to 120 to 104

Link to comment
Share on other sites

someone posted this last night there

jimmyjohn1

7/7/2012 6:51 PM EDT

The observer was not quite correct. The temperature is averaged over each minute. Then, the five-minute average temperature is calculated from the five one-minute averages. The five-minute average temperature is what's recorded. It's a little more complicated than this, but that sums it up. You can read about the weather algorithms in the ASOS User's Guide (go to page 11 for temperature/dew point) at http://www.nws.noaa....sos/aum-toc.pdf

Before the National Weather Service used ASOS, I believe the minimum and maximum temperatures were from instantaneous temperatures, but I could be wrong.

But in that case the previous record was measured incorrectly...and should be noted in the climate reports.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But in that case the previous record was measured incorrectly...and should be noted in the climate reports.

I've already thrown out the 106's in my head. I don't believe them. Then again at least it wasn't so complicated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...