Amped Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 GFS still east, but stronger. If that verifies good job ARW srefs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minnesota Meso Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 The GFS is often regarded as the flagship of US model's, This will be either a epic win or epic fail, not much in between at this time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minnesota Meso Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 Hmmm.....RAP model, interesting indeed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icebreaker5221 Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 All things considered, Debby is looking quite healthy. The potential was certainly there for diurnal thunderstorms to erupt over the FL peninsula this afternoon generating subsidence over the eastern Gulf, decreasing the favorability of Debby's environment. Instead, more stratiform-type precipitation, semi-associated with Debby developed, and maximum ascent remained over water. Considering we're only slightly past the typical diurnal minimum over the water, Debby looks quite healthy. Tonight's maximum should be telling, but certainly there is the potential for intensification. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phil882 Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 Hmmm.....RAP model, interesting indeed If you are gonna post short-range models... try the HRRR. http://rapidrefresh....omain=t6&wjet=1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alfoman Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 CMC at hour 42....FL hit. btw, for some reason my gut is telling me to stay with the GFS on this one for now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phil882 Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 All things considered, Debby is looking quite healthy. The potential was certainly there for diurnal thunderstorms to erupt over the FL peninsula this afternoon generating subsidence over the eastern Gulf, decreasing the favorability of Debby's environment. Instead, more stratiform-type precipitation, semi-associated with Debby developed, and maximum ascent remained over water. Considering we're only slightly past the typical diurnal minimum over the water, Debby looks quite healthy. Tonight's maximum should be telling, but certainly there is the potential for intensification. I agree, it looks quite healthy despite the vertical wind shear it has been facing the past 24 hours. I'm still curious with all of the latent heat release ongoing to the east of the mean center if there won't be a llc relocation in the next 12-18 hours. Its really hard to gauge by looking at long range radar reflectivity since we are looking more at the mid-levels of the system as the radar beam is tilted upward on the edge of the radar's range. Still, there does seem to be a developing mid-level circulation embedded in the convection. Its also worth mentioning the llc already appears to be north of the NHC's track in the short term. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turtlehurricane Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 I'd be surprised if the center didn't relocate under the convection tonight, completely throwing off the current NHC forecast. This thing is going to end up on a track that'll rake the entire northern Gulf coast with a northeastwards relocation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amped Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 I agree, it looks quite healthy despite the vertical wind shear it has been facing the past 24 hours. I'm still curious with all of the latent heat release ongoing to the east of the mean center if there won't be a llc relocation in the next 12-18 hours. Its really hard to gauge by looking at long range radar reflectivity since we are looking more at the mid-levels of the system as the radar beam is tilted upward on the edge of the radar's range. Still, there does seem to be a developing mid-level circulation embedded in the convection. Its also worth mentioning the llc already appears to be north of the NHC's track in the short term. At that rate it'll make landfall by 06z Monday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superstorm93 Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 CMC folds Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minnesota Meso Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 If you are gonna post short-range models... try the HRRR. http://rapidrefresh....omain=t6&wjet=1 Phill I thought about the HRR, but the RAP initializes the HRR...just a thought, thank you for your comment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superstorm93 Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 Becoming an extremely frustrating system. Especially if this just meanders into FL like the GFS and CMC have it doing. UKMET is way east as well: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phil882 Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 Phill I thought about the HRR, but the RAP initializes the HRR...just a thought, thank you for your comment Correct, the RAP does initialize the HRRR. This remains the biggest drawback for the HRRR since the model is run at 3km resolution and the data assimilation (DA) is simply not high enough resolution to provide accurate enough initial conditions. They are working on a 3km DA technique for the future implementation of the HRRR. However, where the HRRR shines is in its lack of a cumulus parameterization which makes it particularly attractive to use in the tropics. This is also the same direction the ECMWF is heading in the next decade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minnesota Meso Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 Correct, the RAP does initialize the HRRR. This remains the biggest drawback for the HRRR since the model is run at 3km resolution and the data assimilation (DA) is simply not high enough resolution to provide accurate enough initial conditions. They are working on a 3km DA technique for the future implementation of the HRRR. However, where the HRRR shines is in its lack of a cumulus parameterization which makes it particularly attractive to use in the tropics. This is also the same direction the ECMWF is heading in the next decade. Thanks Phil, Nice explanation, does that mean in some regards we are ahead of the European Community in short range models? but still lacking in the 2-10 day outlooks??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott747 Posted June 24, 2012 Author Share Posted June 24, 2012 0z HWRF through hr 72 - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phil882 Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 Thanks Phil, Nice explanation, does that mean in some regards we are ahead of the European Community in short range models? but still lacking in the 2-10 day outlooks??? Well the main problem is that the Europeans have all their resources in medium range forecasting with the ECMWF. NOAA and NCEP have a much larger suite of products of both short and long range models that need to be constantly run. Combine this with the fact that we have a slower supercomputer and you can see why we lag behind in the medium range forecasting division. You could say we are ahead of the Euros in the short range forecasting area, but thats mainly because nearly all their resources are geared towards medium range forecasting. To bring this back on topic, I think its a very ominous sign that both the UKMET and GGEM are further east tonight. We will see if the ECMWF holds serve. I continue to remain steadfast that a large system such as this is more susceptible to even marginal weaknesses. All it needs to do is move a touch too far north and it will be difficult for the mid-level ridge to capture the circulation beyond that point. The ECMWF had difficulty in the medium range with Lee last year, and this could be a repeat performance if the system continues to drift northward without any substancial westward component. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minnesota Meso Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 CMC is now showing what the GFS has been insisting on for the last two days.Waiting on the ECMWF and EkMET...my guess the Hurricane Hunters info has helped to bring this system into a stronger focus, along with the 0z/24 upper air analysis, all of a sudden this looks like a GFS win IMO. I'm a little red faced now, was leaning strongly towards a non GFS solution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wxmeddler Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 I'm just glad I'm not in the hot seat tonight. IE. "Miami we might have a problem here" or the MIC at TLH who's previous forecast shift put out 15-20 mph winds and 1-2" of rain for the Apalachicola bay area today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thewxmann Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 Yeah, I get the feeling the GFS camp has merit. Still pretty 50-50 about it, but as Phil has stated, center relocations will be crucial, and the trend has been weaker with the central U.S. ridge. P.S. Also, the ULL to Debby's west may have an additional short-term effect of steering Debby slightly more northward, or delay the ridge building back, both of which would favor a GFS scenario. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cheeznado Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 Euro rolling, to 60- has shifted east but not as far as the GFS. Similar to the new Ukie- stalled just SE of the mouth of the Mississippi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoosier Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 Euro rolling, to 60- has shifted east but not as far as the GFS. Similar to the new Ukie- stalled just SE of the mouth of the Mississippi Looks like it should go in around southeast LA on this run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cheeznado Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 This would NOT be good for new Orleans, even if it is pretty weak the very slow movement would really pile up the water along with the rainfall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alfoman Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 ITS OFFICIAL: THE ECMWF TURNS BACK ON ITS WESTWARD TRACK AND MOVES DEBBY NW TO LA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turtlehurricane Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 This would NOT be good for new Orleans, even if it is pretty weak the very slow movement would really pile up the water along with the rainfall Tides were 1 ft above normal in eastern Louisiana during the day yesterday due to gusts in the 20s mph from the east. Just a preview. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wxmeddler Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 Well... Good thing they hoisted those tropical storm warnings... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minnesota Meso Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 Thinking about this, I'm not sure this could be a straight GFS win. Will this system be picked up by the NE trough and lift it out ? And where will the south eastern edge of the ridge set up. So in other words will Betty sit and just stew in the NE gulf area? waiting for the steering winds to effect it? This looks very interesting to me. Hopefully there is a weakness that it finds and moves on instead of sitting in Gulf and strengthening Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmagan Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 06Z Observations Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott747 Posted June 24, 2012 Author Share Posted June 24, 2012 WITH INFRARED IMAGERY THE CENTER...ALTHOUGH PARTIALLY EXPOSED...HAS BECOME A LITTLE MORE DIFFICULT TO LOCATE AND THE FIXES FROM TAFB AND SAB ARE ABOUT 50 MILES APART. MY BEST ESTIMATE OF INITIAL MOTION IS SLOWLY NORTHWARD...OR 360/3. THE TRACK FORECAST FOR THIS STORM IS EXTREMELY CHALLENGING. THE SYNOPTIC REASONING IN PREVIOUS ADVISORIES WAS BASED ON A MID-LEVEL RIDGE BUILDING TO THE NORTH OF THE TROPICAL CYCLONE...WHICH WOULD CAUSE DEBBY TO MOVE TOWARD THE NORTHWEST GULF OF MEXICO COAST IN SEVERAL DAYS. THAT TRACK SCENARIO WAS SUPPORTED BY THE ECMWF MODEL...WHICH HAS BEEN THE BEST-PERFORMING GUIDANCE OVER THE PAST FEW YEARS. HOWEVER...THE 0000 RUN OF THAT MODEL HAS SHIFTED SUBSTANTIALLY TO THE NORTH AND EAST OF THE PREVIOUS RUNS. THE U.K. MET. OFFICE MODEL HAS ALSO SHIFTED SIGNIFICANTLY TO THE RIGHT. IN FACT...ONLY THE HWRF MODEL IS CLOSE TO THE PREVIOUS OFFICIAL FORECASTS...AND EVEN IT IS TO THE NORTH OF THEM. THEREFORE AN UNUSUALLY LARGE RIGHTWARD ADJUSTMENT TO THE NHC FORECAST IS REQUIRED...AND ADDITIONAL SHIFTS TO THE NORTH AND EAST MAY BE NECESSARY IN SUBSEQUENT ADVISORY PACKAGES. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HurricaneJosh Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 This might be one of those situations where the NHC has to make some awkwardly abrupt changes to the forecast track. The key question is whether the right shift is for real or just some windshield wiping. It is interesting how rigidly consistent the GFS has been with the FL solution-- and how the Euro has now "blinked". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bic Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 She looks to be getting better organized as convection begins to wrap around to the N/NNW: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.