Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Winter 2012-2013 General Discussion


Powerball

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 431
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I'm I missing something with GB and the Firsthand Weather's forecast for the 6 month period?

http://firsthandweather.com/blog/all-posts/firsthand-weathers-20122013-preliminary-winter-forecast

Up here in Minnesota, Western WI he is forecasting above normal temps for the two month period Nov and Dec of +1 - +3.

Near normal for Jan and Feb.

Blow torch warm for March and April at +3 to +5.

But yet when he puts out his overall temp forecast for the 6 month period he shows it below normal??? Doesn't that argue for above normal temps up here w/o a iceberg cold period in Jan /Feb?

Second of all, some local knowledge would be helpful. If we are going to see below normal temps up here, we have to solve the drought conditions in NE/IA in my opinion. Without any snow pack in IA/NE any southwest winds or southerly winds will bring warmer than normal temps to our area. The same holds true if we get into a zonal flow, it better be cold to the west of us. The same holds true if we get into NW flow, how warm/cold will the temps be to our northwest?

Therefore without any guidance showing below normal temps for Dec-Jan ( the IRI, CFSv2 and the Jamstec ) my initial thinking for MN and Western WI, is above normal temps and below normal snow fall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm I missing something with GB and the Firsthand Weather's forecast for the 6 month period?

http://firsthandweat...winter-forecast

Up here in Minnesota, Western WI he is forecasting above normal temps for the two month period Nov and Dec of +1 - +3.

Near normal for Jan and Feb.

Blow torch warm for March and April at +3 to +5.

But yet when he puts out his overall temp forecast for the 6 month period he shows it below normal??? Doesn't that argue for above normal temps up here w/o a iceberg cold period in Jan /Feb?

Second of all, some local knowledge would be helpful. If we are going to see below normal temps up here, we have to solve the drought conditions in NE/IA in my opinion. Without any snow pack in IA/NE any southwest winds or southerly winds will bring warmer than normal temps to our area. The same holds true if we get into a zonal flow, it better be cold to the west of us. The same holds true if we get into NW flow, how warm/cold will the temps be to our northwest?

Therefore without any guidance showing below normal temps for Dec-Jan ( the IRI, CFSv2 and the Jamstec ) my initial thinking for MN and Western WI, is above normal temps and below normal snow fall.

Yeah, I went eek when I saw the prediction of below average temps and below average snowfall for most of the region. This would just add insult to injury. Most on this forum don't want below average temps if snowfall will be rather scarce.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cold with no snow is pretty useless imo unless you are able to make your own snow. The exception would be extreme/record cold as that is more exciting to track but it's harder to get extreme cold without a good snow pack.

Exactly, although I suppose the point can be made that record cold in the winter after this record hot summer would be quite exciting and anamolous, but ideally there would be at least close to average snow to make it worth it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw that Chad is coming out with his new Lafayette September 2012-August 2013 outlook on Saturday. I decided to go back and check his monthly forecasts (temp, precip and snowfall) from last year to see if he beat climatology (climo and actual stats from WL coop) in any meaningful way. The answer, of course, is no. But to what degree? Here are his Brier scores (forecasts - observations)^2 versus climatology's.

post-7645-0-75924500-1347405897_thumb.pn

post-7645-0-75854900-1347405898_thumb.pn

post-7645-0-17158900-1347405899_thumb.pn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are in the minority I think. Cold with no snow would be terrible. What a horrible, boring waste that would be. I'd take average temps with less snow than average over that kind of winter.

Yeah, I am. I guess all the agw talk has me freaked a little bit. I would rather have a normal winter temp wise than a lot of snow, just to prove that it still can get cold again... lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are in the minority I think. Cold with no snow would be terrible. What a horrible, boring waste that would be. I'd take average temps with less snow than average over that kind of winter.

Well...cold with no snow is certainly NOT fun...but id STILL take my chances over a mild winter. Because its not like there will literally be NO snow...so what little falls should at least stay on the ground.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I am. I guess all the agw talk has me freaked a little bit. I would rather have a normal winter temp wise than a lot of snow, just to prove that it still can get cold again... lol.

Try not to let it freak you out. Of course it can get cold again.....we had several cold winters this past decade...two hot summers and a mild winter in between is JUST what the agw-istas needed to have their circle ****, but the truth of the matter is once we get out of the warm pattern, they will quiet down some, just as they did during the recent harsh 2010-11 winter. They always insist that the weather pattern we are having in the U.S. isnt what influences their agw talk, but Ive seen it over and over, and sorry, that is how it always works. Whats more...do not forget...they can talk agw all they want, but you live in a climate where winters are already so cold that mild winters mean nothing wrt snowfall...THAT is all about storm track. Winter will always be winter, that is near certain, in all of our lifetimes for those of us N of I-80. What actually happens with temps remains to be seen, but gray skies and snowstorms are going nowhere. And I would love for you to see a brutally cold winter that suppresses the storm track slightly south for ORD-DTW-CLE specials :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Try not to let it freak you out. Of course it can get cold again.....we had several cold winters this past decade...two hot summers and a mild winter in between is JUST what the agw-istas needed to have their circle ****, but the truth of the matter is once we get out of the warm pattern, they will quiet down some, just as they did during the recent harsh 2010-11 winter. They always insist that the weather pattern we are having in the U.S. isnt what influences their agw talk, but Ive seen it over and over, and sorry, that is how it always works. Whats more...do not forget...they can talk agw all they want, but you live in a climate where winters are already so cold that mild winters mean nothing wrt snowfall...THAT is all about storm track. Winter will always be winter, that is near certain, in all of our lifetimes for those of us N of I-80. What actually happens with temps remains to be seen, but gray skies and snowstorms are going nowhere. And I would love for you to see a brutally cold winter that suppresses the storm track slightly south for ORD-DTW-CLE specials :D

That sounds like a nightmare but it happens. lol, I am sure we will both get our shot at snowstorms this coming winter, at least hope for an average winter at least.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Try not to let it freak you out. Of course it can get cold again.....we had several cold winters this past decade...two hot summers and a mild winter in between is JUST what the agw-istas needed to have their circle ****, but the truth of the matter is once we get out of the warm pattern, they will quiet down some, just as they did during the recent harsh 2010-11 winter. They always insist that the weather pattern we are having in the U.S. isnt what influences their agw talk, but Ive seen it over and over, and sorry, that is how it always works. Whats more...do not forget...they can talk agw all they want, but you live in a climate where winters are already so cold that mild winters mean nothing wrt snowfall...THAT is all about storm track. Winter will always be winter, that is near certain, in all of our lifetimes for those of us N of I-80. What actually happens with temps remains to be seen, but gray skies and snowstorms are going nowhere. And I would love for you to see a brutally cold winter that suppresses the storm track slightly south for ORD-DTW-CLE specials :D

Lookin' cold this winter ...

usT2mSeaInd4.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clippers can deliver good snowfall sometimes so all hope would not be lost if it were a parade of them. I would prefer storms from the southwest though.

Sometimes you can make up some good ground with a handful of high ratio snow producing Clippers. But of course the SW storms are best with laying down deep snows!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A cold winter without a lot of snow would just be pure hell, like a hot summer without a lot of severe weather is to many on here.

Perfection is temps around 25*F-35*F and frequent snowstorms/lake effect snow.

No to 35. I would prefer to never see a high over 25 until March 1st.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now there's a wild card in the mix. How will this event affect Winter, nevermind the fall forecasts?

http://uk.reuters.co...E88C1DJ20120913

The volcano, 25 miles (40 km) southwest of the capital Guatemala City, erupted in the early afternoon, belching a cloud of ash above the crater, Guatemala's emergency agency CONRED said in a statement.

Roughly 11,000 people have been evacuated and 8,000 more were awaiting transfer to shelters, said Sergio Cabanas, CONRED's director of emergency response. Up to 10,000 others could be moved to safety depending on wind conditions and ash emissions, he added.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...