Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,608
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

CFS Long Range (as in Winter)


mitchnick

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 697
  • Created
  • Last Reply

February in El Ninos is almost guaranteed to have blocking...in that sense, enso can very very useful. I think there has been 1 Nino off the top of my head that didn't have it and that was Feb 1992. Feb '73 was kind of crappy so that may have lacked blocking as well, but I didn't pull up the maps. But literally all other Ninos...even the terrible ones...had it.

Obviously snowfall has some other factors in there. For DCA, the STJ is a big one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

February in El Ninos is almost guaranteed to have blocking...in that sense, enso can very very useful. I think there has been 1 Nino off the top of my head that didn't have it and that was Feb 1992. Feb '73 was kind of crappy so that may have lacked blocking as well, but I didn't pull up the maps. But literally all other Ninos...even the terrible ones...had it.

Obviously snowfall has some other factors in there. For DCA, the STJ is a big one.

Feb 1973 had an ao of something like 0.7 and a nao of -0.2 or 0.3 so not much blocking where you wanted it even though there was a southern stream. There was nothing to hold in cold air.

post-70-0-53822200-1344443826_thumb.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The CFS (the new one) actually now shows a torch (relativel speaking) for the central and southeast US for winter...the temp pattern looks La Nina-ish minus February. The older version of the CFS continues to show a cold northeast throughout the winter.

whji2d.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The CFS (the new one) actually now shows a torch (relativel speaking) for the central and southeast US for winter...the temp pattern looks La Nina-ish minus February. The older version of the CFS continues to show a cold northeast throughout the winter.

whji2d.jpg

Let us reiterate what has been said on many a long-range thread: First, it's the CFS. Also, the CFS' forecast changes nearly day to day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Accuwx predicts above-normal snowfall for the I-95 corridor? I'm absolutely stunned at this unprecedented turn of events...

Next you're going to tell me that JB is predicting above-normal snowfall for the I-95 corridor. Like THAT's ever happened before...
:lmao:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Accuwx predicts above-normal snowfall for the I-95 corridor? I'm absolutely stunned at this unprecedented turn of events...

Next you're going to tell me that JB is predicting above-normal snowfall for the I-95 corridor. Like THAT's ever happened before...
:lmao:

Even a broken clock is right twice a day, they are bound to be right one of these winters if they call for above average every winter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lundberg a few days ago was saying that he thought that this could resemble the winter of '76-'77. I only care about getting near normal snow for once.

Any year is technically up for grabs... 76-77 had a weak Nino (after coming out of a strong Nina) and -QBO that matches up with the forecast ENSO fairly well, but it will likely be the opposite in terms of the AMO and PDO this winter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

all the times BWI has been screwed and PHL has cashed in over the years, it's hard to fathom that their average snowfall is only 2.6"/year higher than BWI (per their article)

I believe BWI is a better spot for CAD (someone correct me if I'm wrong), and DC/Balt specials aren't as rare as you think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...